The courtship of Anthony Davis has turned into a firestorm between small and big market franchises.
Davis is signed through next season with the Pelicans, who have no desire to trade one of the league’s most talented players. Davis has not expressed any public desire to be moved. Yet there is constant speculation about Davis getting dealt to Los Angeles to join forces with LeBron James or Boston as the final piece to its championship puzzle.
James fanned the flames this week by saying that playing with Davis would be “amazing” and “incredible.” Davis recently signed up with James’ agent, Rich Paul of Klutch Sports, only fueling speculation of a potential trade before Davis can decline his 2020/21 player option and become a free agent.
There are tampering fines in place for players, coaches and executives regarding public courtship of players from other teams. In this instance, the league determined James’ comments did not warrant a penalty.
That has infuriated small market executives, according to ESPN’s Adrian Wojnarowski. It’s hard enough for those teams to possess a player of Davis’ talent. It’s become increasingly difficult to hold onto those players because of the “super-team” mentality among players, its broadcast partners and many fans.
One executive told Wojnarowski, “It’s New Orleans’ problem today, and a problem with a different player tomorrow for the rest of us. It’s open season on small markets and our players.”
That brings us to our question of the day: Do you think the league should do more to protect small-market franchises from tampering or interference regarding their star players? Or is the league better off with a few “super-teams” in major markets?
Please take to the comments section to weigh in on this topic. We look forward to your input.