Hoops Rumors Originals

Community Shootaround: 2024/25 NBA Rookie Class

Leading up to the 2024 NBA draft, we heard over and over again that the class didn’t feature the type of star-level talent at the top that we’d seen in recent years, when No. 1 overall picks like Victor Wembanyama and Paolo Banchero went on to earn Rookie of the Year awards. The common refrain was that some of 2024’s top prospects had the ability to eventually become impact players, but none were likely to be immediate difference-makers.

[RELATED: 2024 NBA Draft Results]

So far, that has certainly been the case for the players drafted with the top few picks in June.

Hawks forward Zaccharie Risacher, the No. 1 overall pick, is shooting just 38.6% from the field and 25.0% on three-pointers. Wizards center Alex Sarr is among the NBA’s leaders in blocked shots (2.1 per game), but the No. 2 overall pick has been ineffective on offense, with a 35.1% field goal percentage, including 20.3% from beyond the arc. No. 3 pick Reed Sheppard has found playing time hard to come by with the Rockets and has averaged a modest 3.7 points in 11.9 minutes per game.

Still, while the top 2024 picks aren’t exactly off to red-hot starts, there are a handful of rookies who have exceeded expectations this fall. A pair of non-lottery selections lead the way — Jared McCain of the Sixers and Dalton Knecht of the Lakers, who were drafted 16th and 17th respectively, are already making teams regret passing on them.

McCain has been one of the few bright spots for a 2-11 Sixers team, averaging 25.2 points per game on .482/.441/1.000 shooting in six appearances since becoming a regular rotation player. Knecht had a monster night on Tuesday to lead the Lakers over the Jazz, racking up 37 points and matching an NBA rookie record with nine three-pointers. He has now averaged 24.3 PPG on .673/.677/.857 shooting in his past four outings.

After Tuesday’s game, LeBron James was asked about Knecht and admitted that the Lakers drafting him at No. 17 was less about the scouting department finding a diamond in the rough and more about L.A. lucking out, as Dave McMenamin of ESPN relays.

“The other 16 teams f—ed it up,” James said. “Did anybody watch him? S–t. … You don’t ‘find’ an SEC player of the year.”

Besides McCain and Knecht, there are a few other rookies who have stood out in the early going. The Grizzlies have two of them, with lottery pick Zach Edey averaging 11.1 points and 6.9 rebounds per game as the team’s primary center and second-rounder Jaylen Wells chipping in 11.5 PPG with a .368 3PT% as a rotation mainstay.

Wizards guard Carlton Carrington (10.4 PPG, 5.0 APG, .389 3PT%), Jazz big man Kyle Filipowski (7.5 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 2.2 APG), and Suns defensive ace Ryan Dunn are among the other rookies who have made positive first impressions.

We want to know what you think. Have the results through the season’s first four weeks made your change your Rookie of the Year prediction? Are you concerned about any of the top picks in this year’s class or do you think it’s just a matter of time until they start making strides (and shots)? Do you expect McCain and Knecht to continue playing at – or even anywhere near – their current levels? Which player looks to you like the steal of the 2024 draft?

Head to the comment section below to weigh in with your thoughts on this year’s NBA rookie class!

Cash Sent, Received In NBA Trades For 2024/25

During each NBA league year, teams face limits on the amount of cash they can send out and receive in trades. Once they reach those limits, they’re no longer permitted to include cash in a deal until the following league year.

For the 2024/25 NBA season, the limit is $7,240,000. If a team is including cash in a deal, the minimum amount required is $110,000.

The limits on sending and receiving cash are separate and aren’t dependent on one another, so if a team sends out $7,240,000 in one trade, then receives $7,240,000 in another, they aren’t back to square one — they’ve reached both limits for the season and can’t make another deal that includes cash.

Adding cash to a deal can serve multiple purposes. It can be a sweetener to encourage a team to make a deal in the first place – like when a club acquires a second-round pick in exchange for cash, or sends out an unwanted contract along with cash – or it can be a necessity to meet CBA requirements.

For instance, when the Hornets agreed to acquire Devonte’ Graham and a second-round pick from the Spurs over the summer, San Antonio essentially just wanted to clear some salary and Charlotte just wanted that draft pick. But the Spurs had to receive something in the deal, so the Hornets sent $110K, the minimum amount that can change hands in any trade involving cash.

Teams operating above the second tax apron are prohibited from sending out cash in a trade. For the time being, that restriction applies to four teams: the Suns, Celtics, Timberwolves, and Bucks. Those teams could only send out cash if they dip below the second apron.

We’ll use the space below to track each team’s cash sent and received in trades for the 2024/25 season, updating the info as necessary leading up to the 2025 trade deadline and for the first part of the 2025 offseason next June. These totals will reset once the ’25/26 league year begins on July 1.

Note: Data from Eric Pincus of Sports Business Classroom was used to confirm incoming and outgoing amounts for the Bulls, Clippers, Hornets, Jazz, Kings, Nuggets, Raptors, Spurs, Timberwolves, Trail Blazers, and Warriors.


Atlanta Hawks

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Boston Celtics

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Note: The Celtics are ineligible to send out cash as long as they’re operating over the second apron.

Brooklyn Nets

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Charlotte Hornets

  • Cash available to send: $7,020,000
  • Cash available to receive: $0
    • Received $7,240,000 from Knicks.

Chicago Bulls

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $5,240,000
    • Received $2,000,000 from Kings.

Cleveland Cavaliers

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Dallas Mavericks

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Denver Nuggets

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,130,000

Detroit Pistons

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Golden State Warriors

  • Cash available to send: $3,640,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Houston Rockets

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Indiana Pacers

  • Cash available to send: $6,240,000
    • Sent $1,000,000 to Spurs.
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Los Angeles Clippers

  • Cash available to send: $2,912,475
    • Sent $4,327,525 to Jazz.
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Los Angeles Lakers

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Memphis Grizzlies

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Miami Heat

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Milwaukee Bucks

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Note: The Bucks are ineligible to send out cash as long as they’re operating over the second apron.

Minnesota Timberwolves

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $4,740,000

Note: The Timberwolves are ineligible to send out cash as long as they’re operating over the second apron.

New Orleans Pelicans

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

New York Knicks

  • Cash available to send: $0
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Oklahoma City Thunder

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Orlando Magic

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Philadelphia 76ers

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Phoenix Suns

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Note: The Suns are ineligible to send out cash as long as they’re operating over the second apron.

Portland Trail Blazers

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $4,740,000

Sacramento Kings

  • Cash available to send: $3,240,000
    • Sent $2,000,000 to Bulls.
    • Sent $2,000,000 to Spurs.
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

San Antonio Spurs

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $4,130,000
    • Received $1,000,000 from Pacers.
    • Received $110,000 from Hornets.
    • Received $2,000,000 from Kings.

Toronto Raptors

  • Cash available to send: $5,840,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Utah Jazz

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $2,912,475

Washington Wizards

  • Cash available to send: $7,240,000
  • Cash available to receive: $7,240,000

Community Shootaround: Sixers’, Bucks’ Slow Starts

When the Sixers and Bucks squared off in a nationally televised opener, it was billed as a battle of Eastern Conference heavyweights.

Milwaukee won the game by 15 points with Joel Embiid and Paul George sitting out the contest.

Since that point, both teams have floundered. The Bucks head into the week with a 4-9 record and their other three wins came against Toronto and Utah – the teams that occupy the bottom of their respective conference standings – and Detroit. The Bucks needed a 59-point outburst from Giannis Antetokounmpo and overtime to defeat the Pistons, who would have won in regulation if rookie Ron Holland hadn’t missed two free throws in the final second.

The Sixers, the biggest spenders on the free agent market, have been even worse. They’re 2-10 with both wins coming in overtime.

To be fair, injuries have played a major role. Khris Middleton has yet to make his season debut for the Bucks as he rehabs an ankle injury. Damian Lillard hasn’t played since last Sunday due to a concussion.

The Sixers haven’t seen what their Big Three can do. Embiid has only appeared in two games and George has missed half of their contests. Tyrese Maxey hasn’t played since Nov. 6 due to a hamstring injury.

Despite all that, it’s still eye-opening to see those two franchises near the bottom of the standings a month into the season. There has been speculation that Antetokounmpo may eventually ask for a change of scenery. Until the Bucks start beating better teams, no one can take them seriously.

Philadelphia will undoubtedly get better when Maxey returns but Embiid’s knee issues remain an ongoing concern. The Sixers currently rank last in the NBA in scoring, rebounding and field-goal percentage.

That brings up to today’s topic: Do you think the Bucks and Sixers will turn things around or will their struggles continue? Which one is more likely to become a contender this season? Do you feel they need to make some moves to change their fortunes or do they just need to have better luck injury-wise?

Please take to the comments section to weigh on this topic. We look forward to your input.

Players Eligible For In-Season Veteran Extensions In 2024/25

As we explain in our glossary entry on veteran contract extensions, rookie scale extensions have historically been the most common form of contract extension in the NBA. However, recent Collective Bargaining Agreements have loosened the rules on eligibility for veteran extensions and made them more financially advantageous, especially for players who don’t expect mega-deals.

As a result, we’ve seen a substantial bump in veteran contract extensions in recent seasons. During the 2021/22 league year, 21 players signed them, and that total jumped to 23 players in 2022/23. While there were only 17 veteran extensions in ’23/24, that total was eclipsed early in the 2024/25 league year and that list could continue to grow ahead of June 30, 2025.

[RELATED: 2024/25 NBA Contract Extension Tracker]

Certain extension-eligible players may prefer to wait until they reach free agency to sign a new contract, since their maximum extension would be far less than the maximum contract they’d be eligible to earn on the open market.

The maximum starting salary a player can receive in a veteran extension is up to 140% of his current salary. A player on a more modest contract can receive a maximum starting salary worth up to 140% of the NBA’s estimated average salary. In 2024/25, 140% of the estimated average salary would work out to a $18,102,000 salary in the first year of a contract extension. A player who signs an extension that fits that bill could get up to four years and approximately $81MM.

Wendell Carter Jr., Andrew Nembhard, and Ivica Zubac have all signed extensions meeting that criteria in 2024/25, albeit for three years each instead of four. Thunder guard Alex Caruso is the next noteworthy player who will become eligible for an extension that begins at $18,102,000.

Now that the regular season is underway, the group of veterans eligible for contract extensions has shrunk, since players with more than one year left on their contracts aren’t permitted to sign an in-season extension. But there are still a number of veterans in the final year of their respective contracts who remain eligible for extensions right up until the last day of the current league year (June 30).

Listed below are the players who meet the criteria for a veteran extension. Players who were recently traded can be extended, but they have to wait for six months after the trade to sign a contract longer than four total years (including the current season) with a first-year bump of more than 20% or a subsequent annual raise exceeding 5%. If a player below is noted as having “limited” eligibility until a certain date, that’s why.

Once a player regains his full extension eligibility, he becomes eligible to sign an extension of up to five total years (including the current season) with a 40% first-year raise (or 40% of the estimated average salary).

Additionally, extension-eligible players with a player or team option for 2025/26 would have to eliminate that option year as part of an extension agreement in order to meet the necessary criteria.

Here’s the full list of veterans eligible for contract extensions during the 2024/25 season:


Atlanta Hawks

Boston Celtics

Brooklyn Nets

Charlotte Hornets

  • None

Chicago Bulls

Cleveland Cavaliers

Dallas Mavericks

  • None

Denver Nuggets

  • None

Detroit Pistons

Golden State Warriors

Houston Rockets

Indiana Pacers

  • None

Los Angeles Clippers

Los Angeles Lakers

  • None

Memphis Grizzlies

  • None

Miami Heat

Milwaukee Bucks

Minnesota Timberwolves

  • Josh Minott
    • 2025/26 team option must be declined.
  • Julius Randle
    • Limited eligibility until April 4.
    • 2025/26 player option must be declined.

New Orleans Pelicans

New York Knicks

Oklahoma City Thunder

Orlando Magic

Philadelphia 76ers

  • None

Phoenix Suns

  • None

Portland Trail Blazers

Sacramento Kings

  • None

San Antonio Spurs

  • None

Toronto Raptors

Utah Jazz

Washington Wizards

NBA Repeater Taxpayer Tracker

As we outlined in our glossary entry on luxury tax penalties, an NBA team is subject to more punitive “repeater” tax rates if it finishes a season in luxury tax territory after having also done so in three of the previous four seasons.

If a team is a taxpayer after having stayed out of tax territory for at least two of the previous four seasons, it pays the “standard” tax rates. In 2024/25, those standard tax rates start at $1.50 per dollar in the first tax bracket and increase as a team moves deeper into the tax. By comparison, the repeater rates begin at $2.50 per dollar and are always one dollar higher than the standard rates.

In practical terms, this means that when the Warriors finished over $40MM above the luxury tax line in 2023/24 and were subject to the repeater rate, their tax bill was worth an estimated $177MM. If they had been paying the standard tax rates, that bill would have come in a little under $137MM, saving them $40MM+.

The gap between the standard and repeater rates will further increase beginning in 2025/26, when the NBA tweaks its rates to implement more punitive penalties for repeater taxpayers and teams that operate deep in tax territory. If those new rates had been in place for the 2023/24 Warriors, their tax bill would have exceeded $260MM.

With all that in mind, it’s worth keeping tabs on which teams are subject to the repeater penalties in each NBA season.

In the space below, we’ll monitor which NBA teams have been taxpayers in each of the previous four seasons, updating the list each offseason to ensure the four most recent seasons are accounted for. If a team shows up three of these four lists, they’ll be subject to the repeater tax rate in the current season, as noted at the bottom of the article.

This list can be found anytime under the “Hoops Rumors Features” menu on the right sidebar on our desktop site, or on the “Features” page in our mobile menu.


Here are the taxpaying teams for the past four seasons:

Note: Teams marked with an asterisk (*) paid the repeater tax rate for that season.

2023/24:

  • Boston Celtics
  • Denver Nuggets
  • Golden State Warriors *
  • Los Angeles Clippers *
  • Los Angeles Lakers *
  • Miami Heat
  • Milwaukee Bucks *
  • Phoenix Suns

2022/23:

  • Boston Celtics
  • Brooklyn Nets
  • Dallas Mavericks
  • Denver Nuggets
  • Golden State Warriors *
  • Los Angeles Clippers
  • Los Angeles Lakers
  • Milwaukee Bucks
  • Phoenix Suns

2021/22:

  • Brooklyn Nets
  • Golden State Warriors
  • Los Angeles Clippers
  • Los Angeles Lakers
  • Milwaukee Bucks
  • Philadelphia 76ers
  • Utah Jazz

2020/21:

  • Brooklyn Nets
  • Golden State Warriors
  • Los Angeles Clippers
  • Los Angeles Lakers
  • Milwaukee Bucks
  • Philadelphia 76ers
  • Utah Jazz

Based on the lists above, the following teams will be subject to the repeater rate in 2024/25 if they finish the season in the tax:

  • Brooklyn Nets
  • Golden State Warriors
  • Los Angeles Clippers
  • Los Angeles Lakers
  • Milwaukee Bucks

Of those five teams, only the Nets are operating below the tax line at the time of publication. It’s possible that could change later in the season as a result of in-season trades — the Warriors and Clippers are currently better positioned than the Lakers or Bucks to duck the tax.

The Nets were a taxpayer in 2021, 2022, and 2023, but because they stayed out of tax territory in 2024, they can reset their repeater clock and avoid paying the more punitive rates until at least 2029 if they avoid the tax this season. It’s a safe bet they’ll do so.

Having been in tax territory in both 2023 and 2024, the Celtics, Nuggets, and Suns are the teams currently projected to become new repeater taxpayers during the 2025/26 season if they finish the ’24/25 season in the tax, which is highly likely.

Hoops Rumors Glossary: Luxury Tax Penalties

NBA teams can become hard-capped during a given league year if they use specific cap exceptions or make certain transactions, but the league doesn’t have a hard cap in place for all its teams.

However, in addition to its soft cap, the league does have a luxury tax threshold, which serves to discourage excessive spending. When a team’s total salary is over that line at season’s end, the NBA charges a tax for every surplus dollar the club spends.

The luxury tax line is set each season at 121.5% of the salary cap threshold, rounded to the nearest thousand. In 2024/25, the league’s salary cap is set at $140,588,000, so the luxury tax threshold is $170,814,000. That means any team whose total ’24/25 salary exceeds $170,814,000 on the last day of the regular season is subject to a tax bill.

The NBA’s luxury tax system is set up so that the penalties become more punitive the further teams go beyond the tax line. Teams who are in the first tax bracket will pay a significantly less significant tax rate per dollar than teams operating in the third or fourth bracket (or beyond).

In 2023/24, the amount of each tax bracket was $5MM, which meant a team faced an increased tax rate once its total salary surpassed $5MM over the tax, $10MM over the tax, $15MM over the tax, and so on.

In 2024/25 and in subsequent seasons, the size of those tax brackets will increase at the same rate as the salary cap. For example, since the cap rose by about 3.36% from ’23/24 to ’24/25, the size of each tax bracket increased by 3.36% too, from $5MM to $5,168,000.

Here’s what the luxury penalties will look like in 2024/25:

Tax bracket
Amount above tax line
Tax rate (per $)
Maximum penalty
1 $1 – $5,168,000 $1.50 $7,752,000
2 $5,168,001 – $10,336,000 $1.75 $9,044,000
3 $10,336,001 – $15,504,000 $2.50 $12,920,000
4 $15,504,001 – $20,672,000 $3.25 $16,796,000

For each additional $5,168,000 above the tax line beyond $25,840,000 a team operates, its tax rates increase by $0.50 per dollar of team salary. So, the penalty is $3.75 per dollar between $20,672,001 and $25,840,000, $4.25 per dollar between $25,840,001 and $31,008,000, and so on.

Here’s a practical example of how the tax penalties work. The Nuggets currently have a team salary of $182,574,315, which is above this season’s tax line by $11,760,315, putting them in the third tax bracket. Denver’s total salary will likely move up or down before the season is over, but the team’s current projected tax bill is $20,356,788. That’s based on a penalty of $7,752,000 from the first tax bracket, $9,044,000 from the second, and $3,560,788 from the third (a penalty of $2.50 per dollar on $1,424,315).

The rates listed above apply to most taxpayers, including 10 of the 14 teams currently in the tax for 2024/25: the Nuggets, Suns, Timberwolves, Celtics, Knicks, Heat, Sixers, Mavericks, Pelicans, and Cavaliers. However, a team can become subject to a more punitive “repeater” penalty if it paid the tax in at least three of the previous four seasons.

This scenario currently applies to four teams — the Warriors, Clippers, Bucks, and Lakers paid the tax at least three times from 2021 to 2024, which means they’ll be repeat offenders this season.

Here are the penalties that apply to repeat taxpayers in 2024/25:

Tax bracket
Amount above tax line
Tax rate (per $)
Maximum penalty
1 $1 – $5,168,000 $2.50 $12,920,000
2 $5,168,001 – $10,336,000 $2.75 $14,212,000
3 $10,336,001 – $15,504,000 $3.50 $18,088,000
4 $15,504,001 – $20,672,000 $4.25 $21,964,000

As is the case with the standard penalties, the tax rate continues to increase by $0.50 per tax bracket, so a repeater taxpayer in the fifth bracket would face a tax rate of $4.75 per dollar; that would increase to $5.25 per dollar in the sixth tax bracket, and so on.

The Clippers are currently carrying $173,279,116 in total salary, surpassing the tax line by $2,465,116. Because they’re charged $2.50 per dollar as a repeater taxpayer, their projected tax bill is $6,162,790 instead of the standard rate of $3,697,674.

The further into tax territory a team goes, the greater the difference between the repeater rate and the standard rate becomes. For instance, the Bucks’ projected tax bill at the moment is $74,837,699. If they weren’t subject to repeater penalties, it would be just $52,554,394.

The 2024/25 season is the last one in which the rates outlined above will apply. Beginning in 2025/26, the NBA is adjusting the tax rates to make them even more punitive for repeater taxpayers and heavy spenders. Conversely, the penalties for standard taxpayers who finish the season in one of the first two tax brackets will be lowered.

Here are the changes coming next season:

Tax bracket
Standard tax rate (per $)
Repeater tax rate (per $)
1 $1.00 $3.00
2 $1.25 $3.25
3 $3.50 $5.50
4 $4.75 $6.75

These rates will continue to increase by $0.50 per tax bracket beyond the fourth bracket.

The goal of these tweaks is to discourage teams from soaring way beyond the luxury tax line without making the tax line itself a major deterrent.


Since luxury tax penalties are calculated by determining a team’s total cap hits at the end of its season, a team that starts the year above the tax line could get under it before the end of the season by completing trades or buyouts. The Pelicans did just that in 2023/24, moving out of tax territory by salary-dumping Kira Lewis‘ expiring contract in January.

New Orleans is one of just two NBA teams that has never been a taxpayer (Charlotte is the other) and is operating only narrowly above the tax line this season, so it wouldn’t be a surprise to see the team make another mid-season deal to duck the tax.

It’s also worth noting that team salary for tax purposes is calculated slightly differently than it is for cap purposes. Here are a few of the adjustments made at season’s end before a team’s tax bill is calculated:

  • Cap holds and exceptions are ignored.
  • “Likely” bonuses that weren’t earned are removed from team salary; “unlikely” bonuses that were earned are added to team salary.
    • Note: Bonuses based on playoff-related criteria can be removed or added to team salary after the regular season ends. In that scenario, a team’s tax bill is based on its salary at the end of the team’s season (ie. its playoff run), not the end of the regular season.
  • If a player with a trade bonus is acquired after the final regular season game, that trade bonus is added to team salary.
  • If a rookie or second-year player signed a minimum-salary free agent contract, the applicable minimum-salary cap charge for a two-year veteran is used in place of that player’s cap charge.
    • Note: This “tax variance” rule only applies to free agents, not drafted players.

So let’s say that five teams finish the season owing a total of $75MM in taxes. Where does that money go? Currently, the NBA splits it 50/50 — half of it is used for “league purposes,” while the other half is distributed to non-taxpaying teams in equal shares. In our hypothetical scenario, the 25 non-taxpaying teams would receive $2MM apiece.

As cap expert Larry Coon explains in his CBA FAQ, “league purposes” essentially covers any purpose the NBA deems appropriate, including giving the money back to teams. In recent years, the NBA has used that money as a funding source for its revenue sharing program.

Coon also notes that the CBA technically allows up to 50% of tax money to be distributed to non-taxpaying teams, but there’s no obligation for that to happen — in other words, the NBA could decide to use 100% of the tax money for “league purposes.”


Note: This is a Hoops Rumors Glossary entry. Our glossary posts will explain specific rules relating to trades, free agency, or other aspects of the NBA’s Collective Bargaining Agreement. Larry Coon’s Salary Cap FAQ was used in the creation of this post.

Earlier versions of this post were published in previous years.

Community Shootaround: Injuries, Rules Changes

Take a look at our top stories in recent days and an obvious pattern emerges.

Kevin Durant, Ja Morant, Zion Williamson, Jordan Hawkins, Miles Bridges and Tyrese Maxey have all been sidelined by injuries that will keep them out of action for multiple weeks.

They join the likes of Kristaps Porzingis, Jaylen Brown, Bogdan Bogdanovic, Lonzo Ball, Aaron Gordon, James Wiseman, Kawhi Leonard, Khris Middleton, Dejounte Murray, CJ McCollum, Jaylin Williams, Isaiah Hartenstein, Paolo Banchero, Joel Embiid, Jeremy Sochan, Scottie Barnes and Taylor Hendricks among the notable players currently sidelined by injuries. And we’re only into the first few weeks of the season.

This has become the new norm and arguably the biggest issue confronting the NBA. Despite advanced training methods, fewer back-to-backs, load management and rule changes to discourage physical play and flagrant fouls, players keep breaking down.

We’re not talking about football here, where injuries in a contact sport are inevitable. Research past decades and you’ll see that NBA players rarely missed games. Michael Jordan played 80 or more games 11 times. Magic Johnson and Kobe Bryant each appeared in 77 or more regular-season games nine times.

So why can’t today’s players stay on the court? The usual excuse is that the game is more wide open and played at a faster pace. Teams spread the floor and defenders have to cover more ground.

Is it time for the NBA to slow the game down and preserve the players’ bodies? No one benefits when stars are on the bench in street clothes.

What changes can be made? The logical way of making it happen is to put limits on three-point attempts. The league isn’t going to erase the line but it could cap the amount of three-point attempts per game. Or they could have shots beyond the arc only count for three points at certain times of the game, say the last two or three minutes of each quarter. That would bring back more isolation plays and mid-range shooting.

We’ve seen recent rules changes improve MLB play, most notably the pitch clock, which had led to shorter games and less dead time.

That brings up to today’s topic: What steps should the NBA take to address the epidemic of injuries? What kind of rules changes or other methods would you suggest to reduce the amount of missed games?

Please take to the comments section to weigh on this topic. We look forward to your input.

NBA G League Affiliate Players For 2024/25

Throughout the offseason and preseason, NBA teams are permitted to carry 21 players, but that number must be reduced to 15 (plus three two-way players) in advance of opening night. However, up to four players waived by teams prior to the season can be designated as “affiliate players” and assigned to their G League squads.

As we explain in more detail in our glossary entry on the subject, if a player’s NBA team has designated him as an affiliate player and he signs a G League contract, he is automatically assigned to that team’s NBAGL roster.

Of the G League’s 31 teams, 30 are directly affiliated with an NBA club. Only the Mexico City Capitanes are unaffiliated and are ineligible to have affiliate players.

Here are the affiliate players for the other 30 squads to open the 2024/25 season, which tipped off on Friday:


Austin Spurs (Spurs)

Birmingham Squadron (Pelicans)

Capital City Go-Go (Wizards)

Cleveland Charge (Cavaliers)

College Park Skyhawks (Hawks)

Delaware Blue Coats (Sixers)

Grand Rapids Gold (Nuggets)

Greensboro Swarm (Hornets)

Indiana Mad Ants (Pacers)

Iowa Wolves (Timberwolves)

Long Island Nets (Nets)

Maine Celtics (Celtics)

Memphis Hustle (Grizzlies)

Motor City Cruise (Pistons)

Oklahoma City Blue (Thunder)

  • Cormac Ryan
  • Note: The Blue also designated Chase Jeter and Malevy Leons as affiliate players, but Jeter has since been waived, while Leons got a call-up to the Thunder’s standard roster.

Osceola Magic (Magic)

Raptors 905 (Raptors)

Rio Grande Valley Vipers (Rockets)

Rip City Remix (Trail Blazers)

Salt Lake City Stars (Jazz)

San Diego Clippers (Clippers)

Santa Cruz Warriors (Warriors)

Sioux Falls Skyforce (Heat)

South Bay Lakers (Lakers)

Stockton Kings (Kings)

Texas Legends (Mavericks)

Valley Suns (Suns)

Westchester Knicks (Knicks)

Windy City Bulls (Bulls)

Wisconsin Herd (Bucks)

Note: Our affiliate players for 24 teams were officially confirmed by those clubs. Our affiliate player lists for the Delaware Blue Coats, OKC Blue, Rip City Remix, SLC Stars, Valley Suns, and Windy City Bulls have not been officially confirmed and are based on our research.


In addition to these “affiliate players,” G League teams have the ability to fill out their rosters with the following types of players:

  • Returning rights: Players whose G League rights were already held by the team from a previous season (or were acquired in a trade from another NBAGL team).
  • G League draft rights: Players who were selected in this season’s G League draft.
  • NBA draft rights: Players who were drafted by an NBA team and signed a G League contract instead of an NBA contract.
  • Local tryout: Players who earned a shot via a local tryout.
  • G League player pool: Players who signed G League contracts and went undrafted (or signed their contracts after the draft). Newly signed players go through a waiver process and enter the league’s free agent pool if they go unclaimed.
  • Two-way contract: Players who are on a two-way contract with an NBA team and have been transferred to the G League.
  • NBA assignment: Players who are on a standard contract with an NBA team and have been assigned to the G League.

Special Trade Eligibility Dates For 2024/25

In a pair of previous articles, we took a closer look at the trade restrictions placed on two groups of players who signed free agent contracts this past offseason. The smaller of the two groups featured players who can’t be traded by their current teams until January 15, having re-signed on contracts that met a set of specific criteria. The other offseason signees we examined aren’t eligible to be traded until December 15.

In addition to those two groups, there are a few other subsets of players who face certain trade restrictions this season. They either can’t be traded until a certain date, can’t be traded in certain packages, or can’t be traded at all prior to February’s deadline.

Listed below are the players affected by these trade restrictions. This list, which we’ll continue to update throughout the season as needed, can be found on our desktop sidebar under “Hoops Rumors Features,” or in our mobile menu under “Features.”


Players who recently signed as free agents or had their two-way contracts converted:

A player who signs a free agent contract typically becomes trade-eligible either three months after he signs or on December 15, whichever comes later. That means a player who signs on September 1 would become trade-eligible on Dec. 15, but one who signs on Sept. 22 wouldn’t be eligible to be dealt until Dec. 22.

Similarly, players who have two-way pacts converted to standard contracts can’t be dealt for three months after that happens.

Here are the affected players, who signed free agent contracts or were converted from two-way deals after Sept. 15, along with the dates their trade restrictions lift:

December 17:

January 2:

January 15:

January 16:

January 28:

February 5:

Players who sign free agent contracts or have their two-way deals converted to standard contracts after November 6 this season won’t become trade-eligible prior to the 2025 trade deadline, which falls on February 6. That restriction applies to the following players, listed in alphabetical order:


Players who recently signed veteran contract extensions:

A player who signs a veteran contract extension can’t be dealt for six months if his new deal exceeds the NBA’s extend-and-trade limits by meeting any of the following criteria:

  • Includes a first-year raise greater than 20% (or greater than 20% of the estimated average salary, for players earning below the average).
  • Includes a subsequent annual raise greater than 5%.
  • Includes a renegotiation of the player’s current salary.
  • Secures the player for more than four total seasons (including both his current deal and the extension).

A player can sign a veteran extension and remain trade-eligible as long as his new deal doesn’t meet any of those criteria. Timberwolves big man Rudy Gobert, for instance, remained eligible to be traded after signing a three-year extension that featured a pay cut in the first year and raises below 5% in the second and third years.

Here are the players whose recent veteran extensions exceed the extend-and-trade limits, along with the dates their trade restrictions lift:

January 6:

January 7:

January 12:

January 23:

January 26:

February 2:

Ineligible to be traded before this season’s February 6 deadline:

Additionally, when a player signs a super-max contract extension, he becomes ineligible to be traded for one full year.

That means Celtics forward Jayson Tatum won’t become trade-eligible prior to the 2025 deadline despite signing his extension in July. Tatum is the only player who signed a super-max (designated veteran) contract this summer.


Players who were recently claimed off waivers:

A player who is claimed off waivers is ineligible to be traded for 30 days. When a waiver claim occurs during the offseason, the 30-day clock begins on the first day of the subsequent season.

As our tracker shows, four waiver claims occurred during the 2024 offseason, but only one of those players is on a standard contract: Pistons big man Paul Reed.

Reed will remain ineligible to be dealt for the first 30 days of the season, then become trade-eligible on November 21.


Players who were recently traded:

Players who were recently traded can be flipped again immediately. However, unless they were acquired via cap room, they can’t be traded again immediately in a deal that aggregates their salary with another player’s for matching purposes.

For instance, after acquiring Jalen McDaniels from the Kings on October 15, the Spurs could have turned around and traded McDaniels and his $4.74MM salary right away for another player earning about the same amount. But if San Antonio had wanted to package McDaniels and, say, Zach Collins ($16.7MM) for salary-matching purposes in a deal for a bigger-money player, the team would have had to wait two months to do so.

There are two trades that currently fall within the aggregation restriction window: San Antonio’s acquisition of McDaniels and the three-team Karl-Anthony Towns blockbuster that was completed on October 2. However, the aggregation restriction doesn’t apply to most of the players involved in those deals for the following reasons:

  • McDaniels (Spurs), Keita Bates-Diop (Timberwolves), Duane Washington (Hornets), and Charlie Brown Jr. (Hornets) have all been waived since being traded.
  • The Timberwolves aren’t permitted to aggregate salaries since they’re operating over the second tax apron, meaning Julius Randle and Donte DiVincenzo are ineligible to be aggregated whether or not that two-month window has expired.
  • DaQuan Jeffries was signed-and-traded to the Hornets as part of the Towns deal. Since he signed a new contract, the trade restrictions for recently signed free agents apply to Jeffries and he’s ineligible to be moved at all for three months.

That leaves just one player to whom the aggregation restriction applies: Towns can be aggregated with another player’s salary by the Knicks as of December 2.

Any player who is traded after December 6 (without being acquired via cap room) won’t be eligible to be flipped before the trade deadline in a second deal that aggregates his salary with another player’s.


Note: Only players on standard, full-season contracts are listed on this page. Players who sign 10-day contracts can’t be traded. Players who sign two-way deals can’t be traded for up to 30 days after signing.

Hoops Rumors Glossary: Poison Pill Provision

The poison pill provision isn’t technically a term defined in the NBA’s Collective Bargaining Agreement. However, the concept of a “poison pill” has colloquially come to refer to a pair of NBA concepts.

The first of those concepts relates to the Gilbert Arenas Provision, which we’ve explained in a separate glossary entry. When a team uses the Arenas provision to sign a restricted free agent with one or two years of NBA experience to an offer sheet, that team can include a massive third-year raise that’s often referred to as a “poison pill,” since it makes it more difficult for the original team to match the offer.

The second meaning of the “poison poll” is the one that has become more common – and more frequently relevant – in recent years. It relates to players who have recently signed rookie scale extensions.

The “poison pill provision” applies when a team extends a player’s rookie scale contract, then trades him before the extension officially takes effect. It’s a rare situation, but it features its own set of rules, since extensions following rookie contracts often create a large gap between a player’s current and future salaries.

For salary-matching purposes, if a player is traded between the time his rookie contract is extended and the following July 1 (when that extension takes effect), the player’s incoming value for the receiving team is the average of his current-year salary and the annual salary in each year of his extension (including option years, but not including unlikely incentives).

His current team, on the other hand, simply treats his current-year salary as the outgoing figure for matching purposes.

Let’s use Rockets guard Jalen Green as an example. Green was extended by Houston last month, but could theoretically still be a trade candidate this season if the right opportunity arises. He’ll earn $12,483,048 in 2024/25, the final year of his rookie scale contract, then $105,333,333 across the next three years as a result of his extension.

If the Rockets decide they want to trade Green this season, the poison pill provision would complicate their efforts.

From Houston’s perspective, Green’s current-year cap hit ($12,483,048) would represent his outgoing salary for matching purposes. However, any team acquiring Green would have to view his incoming value as $29,454,095 — that’s the annual average of the four years and $117,816,381 he has left when accounting for both his current contract and his new extension.

Even after accounting for the more lenient salary-matching rules for teams operating below the first tax apron, the incoming and outgoing salaries in a trade usually have to be roughly in the same ballpark, as we outline in our traded player exception glossary entry. If one side must view Green as a $29.5MM player while the other side considers him a $12.5MM player, filling out a deal with players and salaries that work for both sides would be a challenge.

[RELATED: 11 Players Affected By Poison Pill Provision In 2024/25]

When a player signs a maximum-salary rookie scale extension whose value will be determined by a percentage of the salary cap, a 4.5% cap increase is presumed for the purposes of calculating his average aggregate salary.

Here’s an example. Since this season’s salary cap is $140,588,000, a 4.5% increase would work out to $146,914,460. Pistons guard Cade Cunningham signed a maximum-salary extension that will begin at 25% of that amount with 8% annual raises, which works out to $213,025,967 over five years. Add that figure to Cunningham’s $13,940,809 salary for 2024/25, divide by six years, and you get $37,827,796, which would be considered his incoming salary in the extremely unlikely event that he’s traded this season.

Cunningham’s rookie scale extension could technically be worth up to 30% of next year’s cap if he meets certain performance criteria (e.g. making an All-NBA team), but that isn’t considered in the calculation for the poison pill provision if the performance criteria has not yet been met.

The poison pill provision is one key reason why a team is unlikely to sign a player to a rookie scale extension unless that team is fairly certain it won’t use him in a blockbuster deal before the upcoming trade deadline.

Of course, there are two sides to that coin. The Warriors, for instance, would have an easier time trading Jonathan Kuminga in the coming months than they would if they had extended him prior to opening night, since his incoming and outgoing cap hits are now both $7,636,307 for the rest of 2024/25. But extending Green in October will make it easier for the Rockets to trade him during the 2025 offseason, whereas Kuminga – a restricted free agent – would be trickier to move at that point due to various sign-and-trade restrictions.

Trades involving a player who recently signed a rookie scale extension are already pretty infrequent. Those players are often young building blocks whose career trajectories are promising enough to have warranted a long-term investment. Those aren’t the kind of players teams often trade. The poison poll provision further disincentivizes a deal involving one of those recently extended players by complicating salary-matching rules, making those trades that much rarer.


Note: This is a Hoops Rumors Glossary entry. Our glossary posts will explain specific rules relating to trades, free agency, or other aspects of the NBA’s Collective Bargaining Agreement. Larry Coon’s Salary Cap FAQ was used in the creation of this post.

Earlier versions of this post were published in previous years.