Hoops Rumors Originals

Community Shootaround: This Year’s Donovan Mitchell

“He made strides as a playmaker in his sophomore season and operating out of the pick and roll … However, he still plays too fast at times, not always reading the defense and making the simple play … He also lacks the ideal height and court vision to see over the top of the defense, especially with bigger opponents guarding him … He has a tendency to settle for tough, contested two-point jumpers, partially due to his inability to consistently get all the way to the rim, and also because of his average decision making skills … While he can make some of these attempts, it will not be a reliable way to score at the next level, and it will decrease his overall offensive efficiency, as it has in college.”

From NBAdraft.net, that was part of last year’s scouting report on Donovan Mitchell. Those concerns led to him being passed over by 12 teams and then traded by the one that did select him. Mitchell was viewed as an undersized player for his position who needed to land in the right situation to be successful.

He blew away expectations, of course, providing the Jazz with the go-to scorer they needed after the loss of free agent Gordon Hayward. Mitchell became a finalist for the Rookie of the Year award and reminded us that the draft remains hard to predict, no matter how closely the prospects are studied.

It’s easy to criticize the teams that didn’t see Mitchell as a future star. It’s much harder to pick out a similar surprise from this year’s crop. The first 10 selections in the latest mock draft by ESPN’s Jonathan Givony are Deandre Ayton, Marvin Bagley III, Jaren Jackson Jr., Luka Doncic, Mo Bamba, Wendell Carter Jr., Michael Porter Jr., Trae Young, Kevin Knox and Mikal Bridges. The next version of Mitchell might be somewhere outside that group. Here are a few candidates:

  • Shai Gilgeous-Alexander — The late-blooming Kentucky star has exceptional size for a point guard, standing 6’6″ with a nearly 7-foot wing span. He is an aggressive defender who can guard several positions, and scouts are confident that his offense will improve as he ages.
  • Lonnie Walker — Miami’s shooting guard is blessed with considerable athletic ability and a nice shooting stroke that should transfer well into the NBA. He was impressive at the combine both on and off the court, as teams took notice of how he smoothly conducted himself with the media.
  • Collin Sexton — For all the attention that went to Young, Alabama’s Sexton may have been the best pure point guard in college basketball. He displayed a combination of strength, speed and agility and seemed to raise his game in big moments.
  • Zhaire Smith — Athleticism stands out for the Texas Tech freshman, who proved to be a dangerous scorer from all over the court and is particularly adept at drawing fouls. He also made strides on defense and as a rebounder and could develop into an all-around player.
  • Miles Bridges — An A-plus athlete who can match up with guards and forwards, Bridges might have been a certain lottery pick if he had left Michigan State last year. He has a smooth jumper and can get easy points on cuts to the basket, but scouts are most impressed by his athleticism and competitive drive.

Of course, there are a lot more candidates, and we want to get your input. Which player projected to be drafted outside the top 10 has the best chance to turn into a star? Please leave your feedback in the comments section below.

Five Key Offseason Questions: Utah Jazz

Losing a homegrown All-Star like Gordon Hayward in free agency last summer could have set the Jazz back years. Instead, it only set them back by three regular-season wins, as the club returned to the postseason and once again advanced to the second round before being bounced from the playoffs.

It was a very encouraging year for the Jazz, showing they’d be able to withstand the loss of a franchise cornerstone without slipping back into the lottery. Rookie guard Donovan Mitchell helped smooth the transition to the post-Hayward era, emerging as a long-term building block in his own right. Now, Utah will have to figure out what roster moves are necessary to give the franchise a better chance at making a slightly deeper playoff run.

Here are five key questions facing the Jazz this summer:

1. Will the Jazz re-sign Derrick Favors?

For a time, it seemed as if a frontcourt combination of Favors and Rudy Gobert simply wasn’t compatible, with Favors struggling to make an impact alongside Gobert and thriving when given a chance to handle the center position on his own. However, Quin Snyder and the Jazz made it work in the second half of the 2017/18 season.

In Favors, the Jazz have not only a reliable backup center for Gobert who can step in and play starter minutes in the event of an injury, but a power forward capable of matching up with other teams’ two-big lineups. Neither Favors nor Gobert can shoot from beyond the arc, but Favors has a mid-range game that stretches the floor to some extent, and as long as they’re on the court with two or three other players capable of hitting threes, it seems to work.

Assuming Utah is confident that the pairing can continue to have success, I’d expect the club to make a strong effort to re-sign Favors as a free agent this summer. If the Jazz have the opportunity to land a versatile impact player at the four, the team could let Favors walk and look to add a more affordable backup center separately, but if not, the Jazz have the cap flexibility to outbid teams that only have the mid-level exception available. It wouldn’t be a surprise to see Favors land a deal worth slightly more than the MLE — perhaps three years for $30-35MM.

2. Will Dante Exum‘s time in Utah continue?

Selected right after Joel Embiid and Aaron Gordon and right before Marcus Smart and Julius Randle in the 2014 draft, Exum is perhaps the only player in that group who isn’t assured a big payday this summer. Various injuries have limited him to 80 regular-season games in the last three seasons, but Exum is still just 22 years old, and flashed tantalizing play-making potential when he got healthy down the stretch in 2017/18.

With Ricky Rubio under contract for one more season and Raul Neto also eligible for restricted free agency this summer, Utah’s long-term outlook at the point guard spot is somewhat hazy. As such, it might make sense for the club to invest in Exum on a sort of a bridge deal for two or three years. If he stays healthy and keeps improving, he could be a ready for a bigger role by the time Rubio’s contract expires. If he continues to battle injuries and fails to make major strides, then the Jazz can get out from under his deal before too long.

Finding a price point that works for both Exum and the Jazz could be a challenge. Near the end of the regular season, one front office executive estimated that a two-year offer worth a total of $18-20MM might be enough for a rival team to pry the former fifth overall pick out of Utah, and I wouldn’t be shocked if a team drew up an offer sheet even more aggressive than that. A team like the Suns, for instance, could afford to roll the dice on a young player like Exum developing into their point guard of the future.

If an offer sheet of that caliber doesn’t materialize, the Jazz should be able to retain Exum on a more reasonable deal, perhaps in the range of $7-8MM per year.

Read more

Hoops Rumors Originals: 6/9/18 – 6/16/18

Every week the Hoops Rumors writing staff strives to create interesting and original content to complement our news feed. Here are the original segments and features from the last seven days:

Taking A Closer Look At LeBron James’ Future

One of the NBA’s all-time best players can become a free agent this summer, and despite rumors about which cities he does and doesn’t like, or where his kids might be attending school next fall, LeBron James‘ next team remains a mystery.

We will, of course, be covering all the latest news and rumors on James’ decision in the coming weeks, but before he decides on his home for the 2018/19 season, we want to take a look at several key factors which will help determine where LeBron will continue his career.

Let’s dive right in…

Why June 29, not July 1, may be the most important LeBron-related date of the summer:

Discussing James’ upcoming “free agency” is getting a step ahead of ourselves, since there’s a very real chance that the four-time MVP won’t become a free agent at all. James currently holds a player option for the 2018/19 season.

Star free agents usually decline player options because doing so gives them a chance to earn a larger salary and to potentially secure a long-term deal if they so choose. However, in James’ case, his $35,607,968 player-option salary actually exceeds the projected maximum salary based on a $101MM cap ($35.35MM). As such, there may not be a strong incentive to opt out of his contract.

Exercising that player option would open up more doors for James this offseason. There are barely any teams around the league that project to have $35MM+ available in cap room to sign him outright as a free agent, but virtually any club could put together a trade package to acquire him if he opts in.

This situation is very reminiscent of Chris Paul‘s 2017. Widely expected to reach free agency, Paul instead picked up his 2017/18 player option before his late-June deadline in order to accommodate a trade to the Rockets, who didn’t have the cap space to sign CP3 outright.

A looming June 29 player-option decision deadline means that James and his representatives may ultimately have to make a decision on his next destination before the end of the month. If LeBron wants to go to a team that will need to trade for him after he opts in, he’ll have to reach an understanding with the Cavaliers by June 29 to ensure that they don’t just keep him for next season once he picks up his option. Additionally, in that scenario, the Cavs would need to feel comfortable that they’ll be able to work out an acceptable trade with the team James wants to join.

It’s an unusual situation, and one that could mean we find out James’ 2018/19 destination even before the new league year begins on July 1.

Read more

Notable Trade Exceptions Available This Offseason

For NBA teams lacking the cap room to make impact additions to their roster this offseason, traded player exceptions represent one tool available to accommodate that sort of acquisition.

As we explain in our glossary entry, traded player exceptions are created when a team trades away a single player without immediately taking salary back in return. The club then has up to one year in which it can acquire one or more players whose combined salaries amount to no more than the traded player’s salary (plus $100K).

That means sizable traded player exceptions created during the 2017 offseason are on track to expire in the coming weeks or months, so teams will have to use them or lose them during the 2018 offseason. Trade exceptions generated during the 2017/18 regular season prior to the February deadline will be available through the offseason and into the 2018/19 season.

The full list of available traded player exceptions can be found right here, but here are a few notable TPEs worth keeping an eye on during the coming offseason:

Portland Trail Blazers
Value of traded player exception: $12,969,502
Expiry date: 7/25/18
Created when they traded Allen Crabbe to the Nets.

The Trail Blazers already have more than $110MM in guaranteed salaries on their books for 2018/19, and that figure doesn’t include a potential new contract for Jusuf Nurkic. So unless they’re able to significantly cut costs elsewhere, it may not be realistic for the Blazers to use their $13MM trade exception to take on another sizable contract.

Still, president of basketball operations Neil Olshey talked earlier this offseason about feeling as if Portland has been too “protective” of some of its assets, including its trade exception. So it sounds like he’ll explore possible uses for it, even if the club ends up not finding a viable deal.

Chicago Bulls
Value of traded player exception: $12,500,000
Expiry date: 2/1/19
Created when they traded Nikola Mirotic to the Pelicans.

The Bulls have been in an odd spot from a cap perspective for the last year, having carried a variety of exceptions that technically made them an over-the-cap team even though their players salaries have never exceeded $99MM. Chicago will have another opportunity to dip below the cap this offseason, and it seems likely that the club will do so, which would mean forfeiting this exception.

Toronto Raptors
Value of traded player exception: $11,800,000
Expiry date: 7/13/18
Created when they traded DeMarre Carroll to the Nets.

The Raptors, who also have a $6,125,440 exception left over from last July’s Cory Joseph deal, are in a similar spot to the Blazers. While their TPEs are good tools to improve the roster in theory, the Raptors have a potential luxury-tax bill to worry about. As such, adding salary without sending out any in return probably isn’t practical for Toronto, and I wouldn’t be surprised to see these exceptions expire.

It’s worth noting that are ways for the Raptors – and other teams on this list – to roll over at least one significant TPE for another year. For instance, let’s say Toronto dealt a player like Norman Powell for someone making about $10-11MM in 2018/19. In that scenario, the Raps could acquire the incoming player with the Carroll TPE and create a new exception worth Powell’s salary.

Los Angeles Clippers
Value of traded player exception: $7,273,631
Expiry date: 6/28/18
Created when they traded Chris Paul to the Rockets.

The Clippers have less than two weeks to use this exception, created in last June’s CP3 blockbuster. This limits their options, since many deals won’t be made until the new league year begins in July. I think this exception is a good bet to go unused.

Detroit Pistons
Value of traded player exception: $7,000,000
Expiry date: 1/29/19
Created when they traded Boban Marjanovic to the Clippers.

With nearly $112MM in guaranteed money on their 2018/19 cap, the Pistons have a little more flexibility than teams like the Blazers and Raptors, but not by much. For instance, Detroit likely wouldn’t be able to use its full mid-level exception and acquire a $7MM player using this TPE. However, if the Pistons can’t find a player they like on the free agent market worth a mid-level investment, this exception could provide an alternate path to adding a bench piece.

Cleveland Cavaliers
Value of traded player exception: $5,811,114
Expiry date: 8/22/18
Created when they traded Kyrie Irving to the Celtics.

There are a ton of moving pieces in play for the Cavaliers‘ offseason, so this modest exception will get overlooked. Still, it could be a useful tool to try to acquire help for LeBron James if he stays — or to help accommodate some roster reshuffling if he departs.

Five Key Offseason Questions: Oklahoma City Thunder

After losing Kevin Durant during the summer of 2016, the Thunder made an effort to reintroduce some star power to their roster during the 2017 offseason, finalizing trades for Paul George and Carmelo Anthony to create a new “Big Three” along with Russell Westbrook.

However, Oklahoma City sacrificed important depth in those deals, and it came back to haunt the team, particularly after Andre Roberson went down with a season-ending injury — the bench ranked 29th in the NBA in scoring during the regular season, and was dead last in PPG during the playoffs. Whether or not George and Anthony are still on the roster next season, OKC will have to find a way to replenish its rotation with reliable contributors.

Here are five key questions facing the franchise this summer:

1. Will George re-sign with the Thunder?

A year ago, it seemed like a foregone conclusion that George would be traded to a team like the Lakers – his preferred landing spot – or the Celtics, who had more than enough assets to put together any number of competitive trade offers. The Thunder ended up shocking the world by snatching George out of Indiana in a blockbuster deal that virtually no one saw coming.

Twelve months later, it’s tempting to once again write the Thunder off as a long-term home for George, particularly after the team’s unceremonious first-round exit from the postseason. There’s a clear path for George to return home to Los Angeles and join the Lakers, who can create enough cap room to sign two stars this offseason.

Still, we keep hearing that the Thunder remain confident about their chances of re-signing George, and Marc Stein of The New York Times wrote this week in his newsletter that there’s a “growing belief” around the league that the club’s confidence is well-founded. I’m still not entirely convinced that George sticks in Oklahoma City. After all, the last time the Thunder were conveying this sort of confidence heading into a star player’s free agency, he bolted for the Bay Area.

It would be fascinating to see what happens if the Thunder do re-sign George. A maximum-salary contract for the two-way forward would start at $30MM+. With about $89MM in guaranteed money already on the club’s 2018/19 cap, and Anthony’s expensive player option likely to add another $28MM or so to that figure, OKC probably can’t really afford George unless costs are cut elsewhere.

2. Will Anthony be on the Thunder’s roster in 2018/19?

Whether or not George is back, Anthony’s player option is a problem. He hasn’t technically opted in yet, but there’s no chance he’ll turn down a $27.9MM+ salary. He’d be lucky to receive a third of that on the open market.

Anthony’s situation is somewhat reminiscent of Dwyane Wade opting into his $23MM+ contract with the Bulls last June. Wade was unlikely to ever get that sort of payday again, so he couldn’t pass up the money, but it quickly became clear that he had no interest in playing for the rebuilding Bulls, and the two sides reached a buyout agreement that saw Wade give up about $8MM in order to sign with a team of his choice.

While the Thunder and Anthony could reach a similar agreement, Carmelo may not quite as eager as Wade was to leave his current situation. Chicago was entering a full-fledged rebuild, whereas OKC hopes to contend again next season, particularly if George returns. Paradoxically though, it looks like there’s no way the Thunder could reasonably keep Anthony on board at his current cap figure if they re-sign George. The tax penalties would be too high.

If George re-signs, I’d expect Anthony to be waived and stretched, even if he’s not willing to give up any money in a buyout. Stretching the final year of his contract over three seasons would reduce his cap charge by about $18.6MM, creating some badly-needed relief for the Thunder. Even if George isn’t back, it wouldn’t be a total surprise to see OKC take that route, since doing so would move team salary well below the tax line and would generate some flexibility for other roster moves.

Read more

Hoops Rumors Glossary: Over-38 Rule

The Over-38 rule, formerly known as the Over-36 rule under the NBA’s previous Collective Bargaining Agreement, closes a loophole in the CBA, preventing teams from paying older free agents more than their cap room or cap exceptions allow. It also limits the ability of players in their mid- to late-30s to sign long-term contracts.

The original purpose of the Over-38 rule was to block teams from circumventing the salary cap by offering a contract that extends beyond when the club expects a player to end his career. For instance, if a team wanted to offer a 37-year-old free agent a two-year contract worth $35MM but only had the mid-level exception available, the team could have made it a four-year offer in order to fit the average annual salary within the MLE, knowing that the player could collect his third- and fourth-year salaries after retiring. The Over-38 rule prevents that.

The Over-38 rule generally takes effect when a free agent signs a long-term contract that extends beyond his 38th birthday. In these cases, the salary in the year(s) after the player turns 38 is considered deferred compensation, and is applied to the years earlier in the contract, when that salary is actually being earned. In most cases, this prevents the team from completing the contract using the necessary cap room or exception.

The Over-38 rule is a little complicated, so let’s use a real-life example to illustrate it. In the summer of 2017, the Rockets and Nene fell victim to the Over-38 rule when they tried to complete a four-year deal using Nene’s Non-Bird rights. The contract would’ve looked like this:

Year Salary
2017/18 $3,477,600
2018/19 $3,651,480
2019/20 $3,825,360
2020/21 $3,999,240
Total $14,953,680

Unfortunately for Nene and the Rockets, the final year of this deal would have violated the Over-38 rule because the veteran center will turn 38 on September 13, 2020, prior to the start of the fourth season of his contract.

The start of a season is considered to be October 1 for Over-38 purposes, so if Nene’s birthday was on October 13 rather than September 13, he would have been okay. But because a four-year deal for him had to be considered an Over-38 contract, the fourth-year salary needed to be viewed as deferred compensation, which would be spread out in a prorated fashion over the first three years of the deal. It would have looked like this:

Year Salary Deferred Compensation Cap Charge
2017/18 $3,477,600 $1,269,600 $4,747,200
2018/19 $3,651,480 $1,333,080 $4,984,560
2019/20 $3,825,360 $1,396,560 $5,221,920
2020/21 $3,999,240 $0 $0
Total $14,953,680 $3,999,240 $14,953,680

Due to the increased cap hits on the new-look deal, the contract would have violated the rules of the Non-Bird exception, which limited Nene’s first-year salary to 120% of his previous salary ($2,898,000). As such, the Rockets couldn’t complete the four-year contract using those Non-Bird rights.

It’s important to note that the Over-38 rule didn’t prevent the Rockets from signing Nene to a four-year, $15MM deal. If the team had wanted to use part of its mid-level exception, it could have given him that same contract the two sides originally negotiated. But Houston had earmarked its MLE for P.J. Tucker, leaving the Non-Bird exception as the team’s only viable means of bringing back Nene. So while Nene technically could have signed a contract that extended beyond his 38th birthday, the Over-38 rule significantly limited the Rockets’ ability to complete such a deal.

In Nene’s case, that fourth year was referred to as a “zero year,” reflecting the adjusted cap charge. Determining what seasons are considered “zero years” is tricky, since a variety of factors relating to the length of the contract, the player’s age, and the player’s Bird rights are taken into account. Here are some of those factors:

  • The Over-38 rule only applies to four- or five-year contracts, or extensions that keep a player under contract for a total of four or five years.
  • The first “zero year” is either the fourth season of the contract or the first season after the player’s 38th birthday, whichever comes later.
  • Players who re-sign with their previous teams prior to October 1 using full Bird rights get some extra leeway. If a player who is 35 or 36 years old signs a four-year contract with his previous team using Bird rights, the Over-38 rule wouldn’t apply. If that player signs a five-year contract, only the fifth season would be considered a zero year. In other words, if Nene had full Bird rights last summer, his four-year deal wouldn’t have been subject to the Over-38 rule.
  • These special exceptions for players with Bird rights don’t apply to players who change teams via a sign-and-trade.

If the Over-38 rule doesn’t already sound complicated enough, there’s an additional aspect of the rule that affects what happens when a veteran on an Over-38 contract plays out most or all of his deal. In that scenario, his deferred compensation gradually stops being considered deferred, and his cap hits are adjusted accordingly over the course of his contract. You can check out Larry Coon’s CBA FAQ for more details on that component of the rule if you’re interested.

Finally, it’s worth noting that LeBron James and Chris Paul reportedly played major roles during the last CBA negotiations in having this rule changed from the Over-36 rule to the Over-38 rule. It’s probably no coincidence that both James and Paul head into the 2018 offseason at age 33 with the opportunity to sign five-year deals that would have been considered Over-36 contracts — the new Over-38 rule won’t interfere with those deals.

Note: This is a Hoops Rumors Glossary entry. Our glossary posts will explain specific rules relating to trades, free agency, or other aspects of the NBA’s Collective Bargaining Agreement. Larry Coon’s Salary Cap FAQ was used in the creation of this post.

Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.

Five Key Offseason Questions: Minnesota Timberwolves

It took until overtime of the 82nd game of the season to do it, but the Timberwolves earned a playoff spot this year for the first time since 2004, ending one of the longest postseason droughts in professional sports. While the club was quickly dispatched in the first round by the top-seeded Rockets, it was a successful year in Minnesota and there’s reason for optimism going forward. After all, two of the team’s top scorers – Karl-Anthony Towns and Andrew Wiggins – are still in their early 20s, with plenty of room to keep improving.

Still, this roster will get very expensive very fast, with Wiggins’ maximum-salary deal set to hit the books, and pricey new extensions for Towns and Jimmy Butler likely to follow. The Wolves’ challenge will be finding a way to retain their most important contributors while filling the roster around them with role players who fit well and don’t break the bank.

Here are five key questions facing the franchise this summer:

1. Will Towns sign an extension? If so, how much will it be worth?

Towns is coming off his first All-Star appearance and first All-NBA nod, which will make extension negotiations between the Timberwolves and his camp very interesting. There’s virtually no doubt that Towns’ next deal will be a maximum-salary contract, but if he earns a spot on the All-NBA squad, he’d eligible for a max worth 30% of the cap, rather than just the 25% he’d typically be in line for.

That potential eligibility doesn’t mean that the Wolves have to offer Towns the full 30% max if he qualifies, but he’s clearly a more important foundational piece than Wiggins, who signed for the 25% max last offseason. I’d expect Minnesota’s contract offer to reflect that.

It’s possible that the Wolves will wait until Towns’ restricted free agency in 2019 to put that long-term offer on the table in order to maximize flexibility, since his cap hold will be lower than his projected maximum salary. The team currently seems unlikely to have cap room available next summer either way though, so there’s no real incentive to wait. Getting an extension done within the next few months may also help ease any lingering tension between the franchise and its star center.

2. Can Towns, Wiggins, and Butler co-exist long-term?

Speaking of that reported “tension,” I wouldn’t expect it to become a destructive force that sinks the current version of the Timberwolves, but it’s worth keeping an eye on — which is just what rival teams are doing. The source of that tension hasn’t been specified, but there were whispers earlier in the year that Wiggins didn’t love being the third option behind his two star teammates, and it’s possible Towns experienced some similar frustrations after his shot attempts dipped by nearly 20% from 2016/17 to 2017/18.

While those teams who are monitoring the situation in Minnesota would love for Towns to become available, Wiggins is the most likely trade candidate of the three. He has yet to become the kind of two-way star the Wolves envisioned when they acquired him for Kevin Love back in 2014, and while there’s still time for him to evolve into that player, many of his skills overlap with what Butler brings the team, which could stunt his growth to some extent.

A stronger outside shooter who doesn’t need the ball in his hands to succeed – think Klay Thompson – would be a better fit with the Wolves’ current roster, but a favorable deal will be hard to find. With Wiggins’ mammoth five-year extension about to take effect after a solid but unspectacular season, his trade value isn’t at its peak.

The Wolves probably won’t break up their “Big Three” this summer, but I think something’s got to give in the long term. If all three players stick with the team and Towns and Butler get new deals for 2019/20, they could easily be earning a combined $90MM that year, and they’d only get more expensive from there. That’s a huge price to pay for three stars who might not perfectly complement one another.

Read more

Five Key Offseason Questions: San Antonio Spurs

For only the fifth time in the last two decades, the Spurs failed to win a playoff series in 2018. Of course, San Antonio did extend its incredible streak of postseason appearances to 21 in a row, and managed to post a 47-35 record despite only having Kawhi Leonard for nine games, so it’s hard to consider the season a failure.

Still, the Spurs have long been considered the NBA’s model franchise, establishing the sort of continuity and stability that other teams strive for, and that mystique was stripped away to some extent in 2017/18. A public fraying of the relationship between the Spurs and Leonard cast a cloud over the second half of the season, and that cloud continues to hover over the club heading into the offseason.

Here are five key questions facing the franchise this summer:

1. How will the Spurs resolve the Leonard situation?

It’s possible that the apparent rift between the Spurs and Leonard’s camp has been overstated, and a sit-down between the star forward and head coach Gregg Popovich will swiftly heal all wounds. But there has been too much smoke for there not to be at least a little fire in San Antonio, where the Spurs’ medical team and Leonard’s own doctors reportedly disagreed over the diagnosis and treatment of his quadriceps injury.

Leonard will be eligible for a super-max extension worth 35% of the salary cap this offseason, but the Spurs will have to think long and hard about putting that offer on the table. Such a deal would be worth over $40MM annually, so if the team has any reservations about Leonard returning to his All-NBA form in the coming years, it would be a scary investment.

On the other hand, the Spurs probably aren’t eager to put Leonard on the trade block, since doing so would essentially mean admitting to a lack of confidence in the 26-year-old long-term outlook, reducing their leverage. San Antonio’s top personnel executives could still probably find a reasonable return for Leonard, but he’s a top-five player in the NBA when he’s healthy, so the team will hope it doesn’t come to that.

I’d expect the Spurs and Leonard to smooth things out, but we won’t get a real sense of which direction this is going until that meeting between Leonard and Popovich happens. This will be one of the most important NBA storylines to watch in the coming weeks, and July 16 will be a date worth keeping an eye on — that’s when Leonard will become eligible for that super-max extension.

2. Will Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili still be Spurs next season?

While Leonard’s future is the most pressing question for the Spurs in terms of on-court impact, two of the team’s other longtime stars also aren’t locks to be back next season. Parker is headed for unrestricted free agency, while Ginobili is mulling the possibility of retirement.

It’s probably early too say whether both players will return, but I’d lean in that direction. Ginobili continued to provide solid part-time minutes for the Spurs in 2017/28 and seems capable of playing at least one more season. With one year and $2.5MM left on his contract, it would make sense for him to play out that deal, then seriously consider calling it a career next summer.

As for Parker, his future in San Antonio is a little less certain. If he has no desire to go elsewhere, I could see him transitioning into a stage in his career where he starts signing shorter-term deals with the Spurs, adjusting his salary up or down depending on the club’s cap situation, like Dirk Nowitzki has done in Dallas.

However, with Patty Mills on a lucrative long-term deal and Dejounte Murray emerging as the Spurs’ starting point guard, Parker’s role on the roster is less defined than it used to be. He averaged just 19.5 minutes per contest last season, easily the lowest mark of his career. If he returns, it will be at a much lower rate than the $15MM+ salary he earned in ’17/18.

Read more

Five Key Offseason Questions: Milwaukee Bucks

The Bucks were a popular preseason pick to grab a top-four seed in the Eastern Conference and perhaps even win a playoff series for the first time since 2001. However, despite a huge year from Giannis Antetokounmpo, Milwaukee struggled to string together wins. The team fired its head coach midway through the season, claimed the No. 7 seed in the East, and was once again knocked out of the postseason in the first round.

With little cap flexibility to go out and make major additions to their roster, the Bucks may have to rely primarily on a new head coach and further internal development in order to take a step forward next season.

Here are five key questions facing the franchise this summer:

1. Is Mike Budenholzer the right head coach for the Bucks?

Budenholzer was linked to the Bucks’ job shortly after the team fired Jason Kidd, back when Budenholzer was still coaching the Hawks and Joe Prunty was the interim head coach in Milwaukee. He didn’t officially secure the position until months later, but the fact that his interest in the Bucks apparently predated his departure from Atlanta is a signal that Budenholzer is excited about the job ahead.

During his introductory press conference, Budenholzer spoke specifically about wanting to unlock the Bucks’ defensive potential, which is an intriguing possibility. Budenholzer’s best squads in Atlanta were among the NBA’s top defensive teams, and Milwaukee has the personnel to create problems for opponents on that end of the court.

With athletic, rangy players like Antetokounmpo, Eric Bledsoe, John Henson, Tony Snell, and Thon Maker on the roster, the Bucks should have a better defensive rating than they did in 2017/18 (110.1; 19th in the NBA). While his impact on the offense will be interesting to monitor too, I’ll be curious to see how much influence Budenholzer can have on D.

2. Will the Bucks re-sign Jabari Parker?

Parker’s free agency will probably fly somewhat under the radar in an offseason when players like LeBron James, Paul George, and DeMarcus Cousins could change teams. However, this is a former second overall pick who has a 20+ PPG season under his belt and is still just 23 years old. It will be fascinating to see what sort of interest he receives as a restricted free agent.

Although Parker’s per-minute production and shooting numbers in 2017/18 were solid for a player coming off his second ACL surgery, he was somewhat inconsistent, and the Bucks were a better team offensively and defensively when he was off the court. That up-and-down play may limit Parker’s earning potential this summer, particularly with so few teams around the NBA carrying significant cap room.

While it’s possible a club with space like the Bulls, Mavericks, or Suns makes a strong play for Parker, forcing Milwaukee to make a tough decision, it wouldn’t surprise me if the former Blue Devil finds himself unsigned after most of the cap room around the NBA has dried up. In that scenario, the Bucks could play hardball in negotiations for a long-term deal, perhaps locking up Parker for about half of the maximum salary, rather than the near-max contract he once seemed on track for.

It’s also not out of the realm of possibility that Parker could sign his qualifying offer this summer with an eye toward increasing his stock in time for unrestricted free agency in 2019. Either way, barring an unexpectedly aggressive offer sheet from a team with cap room, the Bucks appear to be in good position to retain Parker, assuming they want to do so.

Read more