Hoops Rumors Originals

Offseason Salary Cap Digest: San Antonio Spurs

The Spurs haven’t had a winning percentage below .600 in a season for two decades, and the franchise added another cornerstone piece to its core when it signed LaMarcus Aldridge last summer. However, even after a 67-win showing, San Antonio will be faced with a challenging offseason. If Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili, and David West retire or land elsewhere, the Spurs will have some cap room to work with, but not enough for a max contract, and replacing those veterans won’t be easy. With Aldridge and Kawhi Leonard around, it’s not as if San Antonio will enter a rebuilding phase anytime soon, but keeping the team in strong contention for a title may require a little creativity from GM R.C. Buford.

See how San Antonio’s cap situation looks for 2016/17 as Hoops Rumors continues its offseason salary cap digest series.

Guaranteed Salary

Player Options

Team Options

  • None

Non-Guaranteed Salary

Restricted Free Agents (Qualifying Offers/Cap Holds)

Unrestricted Free Agents (Cap Holds)

Other Cap Holds

  • Nikola Milutinov ($1,026,300)
  • Livio Jean-Charles ($990,700)
  • No. 29 pick ($983,400)
  • Total: $3,000,400

Projected Salary Cap: $92,000,000

Footnotes:

  1. Diaw’s full $7,000,000 salary would become guaranteed on June 30th.

The Basketball Insiders salary pages were used in the creation of this post.

Community Shootaround: Sixers’ Offseason

After several years of tanking, the Sixers finally landed the No.1 overall pick during last Tuesday’s draft lottery. Now, they are faced with a critical decision that will shape the franchise for years to come. Coach Brett Brown said the team isn’t leaning toward any particular player, but the decision will likely come down to Ben Simmons or Brandon Ingram, whom Dana Gauruder of Hoops Rumors profiled earlier today. Many believe Simmons will be the pick and although he has the ball handling skills to play in the backcourt, he’s likely best suited at the power forward position.

Drafting Simmons would add to an already full frontcourt. The team expects to have Joel Embiid healthy and ready to play by the beginning of the 2016/17 season and it will likely have Dario Saric coming stateside to play his rookie season in Philadelphia. Despite all the turmoil Jahlil Okafor endured this season, he’s looks to be the team’s best player. Okafor clearly needs to play the center position, as does Nerlens Noel, who will be eligible for a rookie extension this offseason. Finding minutes for everyone may prove to be a chore next season. So that leads us to tonight’s topic: How would you handle the team’s situation? Should the Sixers draft Simmons or Ingram with the No. 1 overall pick? Would you trade away one of the team’s big men and if so, which one and for what?

Let us know what you would do if you were sitting in GM Bryan Colangelo’s chair (likely the ergonomic office chair that Sam Hinkie left behind). Take to the comments section below to share your thoughts and opinions on the topic. We look forward to what you have to say.

Prospect Profile: Brandon Ingram

Robert Hanashiro / USA Today Sports Images

Robert Hanashiro / USA Today Sports Images

OVERVIEW: Brandon Ingram entered Duke as one of the most highly-touted recruits in the country, ranked No. 4 in the Recruiting Services Consensus Index. The 6’9” Ingram lived up to his billing, capturing ACC Freshman of the Year honors while averaging 17.3 points, 6.8 rebounds and 2.0 assists. He pumped up his scoring average to 23.0 during the Blue Devils’ three NCAA Tournament games. It was a foregone conclusion that Ingram would be a one-and-done college player and he could be the first player off the board. With his size, lanky physique and smooth stroke, the 18-year-old has drawn comparisons to Thunder superstar Kevin Durant.

STRENGTHS: Ingram possesses just about every quality an NBA team could ask for in a wing player. He’s a superior shooter who averaged 44.2% from the field and 41.0% from long range while facing top competition. He’s also a willing passer and solid ball-handler who sees the floor well and can run the attack at times. His speed puts pressure on the defense in the open court, where he can go coast-to-coast after defensive rebounds or run the wing and finish. As DraftExpress’ Jonathan Givony notes, Ingram is bound to create mismatches because, with his size and length, he can rise up and hit jumpers over the top of most defenders. If a bigger forward tries to check him, he can create off the bounce and attack the basket. With his 7’3” wingspan, Ingram can also be an impact player on defense. He averaged 1.4 blocks and 1.1 steals for Duke and showed a willingness to be a two-way player, as one talent evaluator told NBA.com’s David Aldridge. “He’s chippy,” the Pacific Division executive said. “He’s in there competing.”

WEAKNESSES: Most players entering the NBA need to add strength to play their position but the concerns are greater with Ingram because of his wiry frame. He’s listed at less than 200 pounds and there’s no question, especially early in his career, that Ingram will simply be overpowered at times. That lack of bulk was one of the reasons why, as Givony points out, he converted just 48% of his half-court attempts inside the paint. While Ingram displayed a polished turnaround jumper, his lack of strength makes it difficult for him to operate in the low post. He was surprisingly below average from the free throw line, making just 68% of his attempts. Givony also asserts that Ingram occasionally loses focus on the defensive end and doesn’t close out as quickly as he should, while ESPN Insider Chad Ford believes that Ingram still has work to do with his ball-handling despite his ability to create off the bounce.

PROJECTED DRAFT RANGE: It will be a surprise if Ingram doesn’t end up with the Sixers with the No. 1 pick or the Lakers with the No. 2 pick. Ingram and LSU freshman forward Ben Simmons seem like virtual locks to be the first two players off the board. The consensus around the league is that the Sixers will select Simmons, though they are playing it coy. Philadelphia is planning to work out Jaylen Brown, Kris Dunn, Jamal Murray and possibly a couple more candidates. ESPN Insider Chad Ford’s Big Board has Ingram in the second slot, while adding the Sixers could opt for fit over upside because of Ingram’s consistent 3-point shooting. DraftExpress’ Jonathan Givony has ranked Ingram No. 1 since mid-March, staunch in the belief that he hasn’t come close to reaching his ceiling and pointing out that Ingram showed rapid improvement in his lone college season.

RISE/FALL: It would be difficult to see Ingram drop out of the top three, given his obvious physical skills and his production at Duke. It’s not out of the question that the Sixers or Lakers could fall in love with a darkhorse candidate and allow the Celtics to scoop up either Ingram or Simmons. A medical red flag could also cause him to slip down but, once again, that’s an unlikely scenario.

FIT: Ingram would fill a major hole for either the Sixers, Lakers or Celtics. The Sixers have an aching need for a top-notch wing player to complete a frontcourt filled with other high lottery picks. Ingram would be viewed as Kobe Bryant‘s heir apparent if he winds up with the Lakers while also providing the franchise with an intriguing young trio in Ingram, D’Angelo Russell and Julius Randle. Ingram would give an outside threat to a Celtics team that ranked No. 28 in 3-point percentage. If he somehow slipped to the Suns at No. 4, he would fill their need for a dynamic small forward.

FINAL TAKE: Once Ingram fills out and goes under the supervision of an NBA strength coach, the concerns over his frame should ease. He quickly emerged as one of the top players in the ACC and it shouldn’t take long for Ingram to develop into a high-level small forward in the pros. He also made a strong impression with NBA executives in his interviews at the draft combine and his background reports say he’s a coachable player and a good teammate, according to Ford’s recent draft workout confidential. He’s not a guaranteed superstar but he should be an All-Star caliber player most of his career.

Prospect Profile: Brandon Ingram (Part Two)

PROJECTED DRAFT RANGE: It will be a surprise if Ingram doesn’t end up with the Sixers with the No. 1 pick or the Lakers with the No. 2 pick. Ingram and LSU freshman forward Ben Simmons seem like virtual locks to be the first two players off the board. The consensus around the league is that the Sixers will select Simmons, though they are playing it coy. Philadelphia is planning to work out Jaylen Brown, Kris Dunn, Jamal Murray and possibly a couple more candidates. ESPN Insider Chad Ford’s Big Board has Ingram in the second slot, while adding the Sixers could opt for fit over upside because of Ingram’s consistent 3-point shooting. DraftExpress’ Jonathan Givony has ranked Ingram No. 1 since mid-March, staunch in the belief that he hasn’t come close to reaching his ceiling and pointing out that Ingram showed rapid improvement in his lone college season.

RISE/FALL: It would be difficult to see Ingram drop out of the top three, given his obvious physical skills and his production at Duke. It’s not out of the question that the Sixers or Lakers could fall in love with a darkhorse candidate and allow the Celtics to scoop up either Ingram or Simmons. A medical red flag could also cause him to slip down but, once again, that’s an unlikely scenario.

FIT: Ingram would fill a major hole for either the Sixers, Lakers or Celtics. The Sixers have an aching need for a top-notch wing player to complete a frontcourt filled with other high lottery picks. Ingram would be viewed as Kobe Bryant‘s heir apparent if he winds up with the Lakers while also providing the franchise with an intriguing young trio in Ingram, D’Angelo Russell and Julius Randle. Ingram would give an outside threat to a Celtics team that ranked No. 28 in 3-point percentage. If he somehow slipped to the Suns at No. 4, he would fill their need for a dynamic small forward.

FINAL TAKE: Once Ingram fills out and goes under the supervision of an NBA strength coach, the concerns over his frame should ease. He quickly emerged as one of the top players in the ACC and it shouldn’t take long for Ingram to develop into a high-level small forward in the pros. He also made a strong impression with NBA executives in his interviews at the draft combine and his background reports say he’s a coachable player and a good teammate, according to Ford’s recent draft workout confidential. He’s not a guaranteed superstar but he should be an All-Star caliber player most of his career.

(For Part One of our Brandon Ingram Prospect Profile, click here.)

Prospect Profile: Brandon Ingram (Part One)

Robert Hanashiro / USA Today Sports Images

Robert Hanashiro / USA Today Sports Images

OVERVIEW: Brandon Ingram entered Duke as one of the most highly-touted recruits in the country, ranked No. 4 in the Recruiting Services Consensus Index. The 6’9” Ingram lived up to his billing, capturing ACC Freshman of the Year honors while averaging 17.3 points, 6.8 rebounds and 2.0 assists. He pumped up his scoring average to 23.0 during the Blue Devils’ three NCAA Tournament games. It was a foregone conclusion that Ingram would be a one-and-done college player and he could be the first player off the board. With his size, lanky physique and smooth stroke, the 18-year-old has drawn comparisons to Thunder superstar Kevin Durant.

STRENGTHS: Ingram possesses just about every quality an NBA team could ask for in a wing player. He’s a superior shooter who averaged 44.2% from the field and 41.0% from long range while facing top competition. He’s also a willing passer and solid ball-handler who sees the floor well and can run the attack at times. His speed puts pressure on the defense in the open court, where he can go coast-to-coast after defensive rebounds or run the wing and finish. As DraftExpress’ Jonathan Givony notes, Ingram is bound to create mismatches because, with his size and length, he can rise up and hit jumpers over the top of most defenders. If a bigger forward tries to check him, he can create off the bounce and attack the basket. With his 7’3” wingspan, Ingram can also be an impact player on defense. He averaged 1.4 blocks and 1.1 steals for Duke and showed a willingness to be a two-way player, as one talent evaluator told NBA.com’s David Aldridge. “He’s chippy,” the Pacific Division executive said. “He’s in there competing.”

WEAKNESSES: Most players entering the NBA need to add strength to play their position but the concerns are greater with Ingram because of his wiry frame. He’s listed at less than 200 pounds and there’s no question, especially early in his career, that Ingram will simply be overpowered at times. That lack of bulk was one of the reasons why, as Givony points out, he converted just 48% of his half-court attempts inside the paint. While Ingram displayed a polished turnaround jumper, his lack of strength makes it difficult for him to operate in the low post. He was surprisingly below average from the free throw line, making just 68% of his attempts. Givony also asserts that Ingram occasionally loses focus on the defensive end and doesn’t close out as quickly as he should, while ESPN Insider Chad Ford believes that Ingram still has work to do with his ball-handling despite his ability to create off the bounce.

(For Part 2 of our Brandon Ingram Prospect Profile, please check back later today.)

Community Shootaround: Next Rockets Coach

In the 1970s, Mike D’Antoni used to compete against Paul Silas on the court. Now he’s competing against Silas’ son for the Rockets’ head coaching job.

Hornets assistant Stephen Silas is receving serious consideration for the position, according to a report Friday by Jonathan Feigen of The Houston Chronicle. Silas impressed GM Daryl Morey and owner Leslie Alexander in a pair of interviews and is now rivaling D’Antoni, who was once thought to be the clear favorite.

Silas is among the youngest 16-year veterans ever in the coaching profession, having started his career with the original Charlotte Hornets at age 27. He is also very much in demand. Silas has an interview scheduled Monday with Warriors coach Steve Kerr about becoming his lead assistant, and the Trail Blazers have been granted permission to talk with Silas about becoming Terry Stotts’ top assistant.

Although D’Antoni and Silas are co-front runners in Houston, the Rockets haven’t stopped the interview process. They will talk to Spurs assistant James Borrego on Monday, and plan to bring in Magic assistant Adrian Griffin as well. Former Cavs coach David Blatt, Raptors assistant Rex Kalamian‎, Grizzlies assistant Jeff Bzdelik, Spurs assistant Ettore Messina, Clippers assistant Sam Cassell and current Rockets assistant Chris Finch were among the others interviewed. TNT analyst Kenny Smith and former Rockets coach Jeff Van Gundy are no longer considered candidates for the position.

That brings us to tonight’s question: Who should the Rockets hire as their next coach? Should they take a veteran like D’Antoni, whose free-flowing offense paved the way for much of what Houston does now? Should it be Silas, who seems ready for the opportunity after more than a decade and a half as an assistant? Will Borrego or Griffin shake up the status quo, or is there someone else who should be considered?

Take to the comments section below to share your thoughts and opinions on the topic. We look forward to what you have to say.

2015/16 D-League Usage Report: Bucks

The NBA’s relationship with the D-League continues to grow, and this season a total of 19 NBA teams had one-to-one affiliations with D-League clubs. Those NBA organizations without their own affiliates were required to assign players to D-League clubs associated with other NBA franchises. D-League teams could volunteer to take on the assigned players, and if no volunteers emerged, the players were assigned at random.

This significant change from the 2014/15 season came about after the Pacers purchased the Fort Wayne Mad Ants and turned them into their one-to-one partner for the 2015/16 campaign. Other NBA teams have interest in following suit in the years ahead, and the NBA’s ultimate goal for the D-League is for all 30 NBA franchises to have their own D-League squads. You can view the complete list of D-League affiliates here.

We at Hoops Rumors are recapping the D-League-related activity for the 2015/16 campaign for each team and we’ll continue with the Milwaukee Bucks, one of the 11 NBA franchises without their own D-League affiliate:


The Bucks made 3 assignments for the 2015/16 season, sending two players to the D-League for a total of 65 days. Listed below are all the assignments and recalls made by Milwaukee for the 2015/16 campaign:


Here’s how Milwaukee’s players performed while on assignment to the D-League this season:

  • Damien Inglis: In 16 combined appearances Inglis averaged 10.1 points, 4.9 rebounds and 1.7 assists in 21.4 minutes per outing. His shooting line was .435/.333/.643.
  • Rashad Vaughn: In four D-League games Vaughn notched averages of 8.0 points, 3.3 rebounds and 2.3 assists in 21.1 minutes per contest. His shooting numbers were .304/.062/.375.

Offseason Outlook: Atlanta Hawks

Hoops Rumors is looking ahead to offseason moves for all 30 teams. We’ll examine free agency, the draft, trades and other key storylines for each franchise as the summer approaches.

State of the Franchise

Kamil Krzaczynski/USA TODAY Sports Images

Kamil Krzaczynski/USA TODAY Sports Images

The Hawks enter the offseason coming off a humbling sweep at the hands of the Cavaliers in the second round of the Eastern Conference playoffs. The franchise likely missed its best window to reach the NBA Finals in 2015, having won 60 games and earning the top seed in the Conference for its efforts. The 2014/15 Cleveland squad was still trying to gel together and the Bulls were hampered by another unfortunate run of injuries, but the Hawks still failed to capitalize and were sent home by the Cavs via a sweep in the Eastern Conference Finals.

Atlanta took a step back this season, notching 48 wins and earning the fourth seed in this year’s playoffs. Both accomplishments are respectable, but the team almost assuredly had higher aspirations when the 2015/16 season tipped off. The Hawks have a number of vital roster decisions to make this offseason and the team may look drastically different in 2016/17 as a result.

Roster Decisions

The biggest decision the Hawks will need to make right out of the gate is whether or not to re-sign center Al Horford, who has spent his entire nine-year career with the team. Horford has been a remarkably consistent performer throughout his tenure and his $12MM salary for 2014/15 was extremely reasonable given his track record and output. The big man, who turns 30 next month, will have no shortage of suitors this offseason, with his current team in Atlanta expected to make him a max offer in July. However, it’s not yet clear whether the Hawks intend to offer Horford a five-year pact to go along with that max salary. While Atlanta appears to be strong frontrunners to lock up the veteran, Houston and other clubs figure to make pitches as well, if given the opportunity. While re-signing Horford would appear to be a no-brainer for the team, big men don’t traditionally age well in the league, so giving Horford a five-year pact is a risky move, regardless of the significant increase in the salary cap that takes effect for next season.

The Hawks will also need to make a decision regarding swingman Kent Bazemore, who enjoyed a breakout season for the team, averaging 11.6 points, 5.1 rebounds and 2.3 assists over 75 appearances in 2015/16. Atlanta only has Early Bird rights on Bazemore, meaning it can only exceed the salary cap to keep him if his contract starts at less than about $6MM annually. Any additional salary for next season would have to come out of cap room, and given the cap flexibility that many teams will have this summer, there is a good chance that Bazemore will end up being overpaid as a result. Whether or not Atlanta will be the one to do so remains to be seen.

Atlanta will also need to decide whether or not Dennis Schröder is its point guard of the future, or if Jeff Teague should continue to be the starting playmaker. Both players have one season remaining on their current deals, though Schröder will only be a restricted free agent after next season, which may factor into the Hawks’ thinking. Teague was reportedly in high demand from a number of teams prior to February’s trade deadline, which certainly makes him and his team-friendly salary of $8MM a potentially valuable trade chip this offseason. Schröder, who has gone on record saying he wants to be a starter going forward, would also fetch a solid return, though his salary of $2,708,582 may make it harder to work a deal for an upper-tier player if Atlanta decides to part with him.

Free Agent Targets

The Hawks won’t know what roster holes they will need to fill until decisions are made regarding Horford and Bazemore. If both players re-sign, Atlanta will likely return all five starters and all five primary reserves from the 2015/16 campaign. While the organization certainly values continuity, this outcome may not be the best one for the team given the rapidly improving competition in the Eastern Conference.

If Horford leaves, Atlanta may be tempted to make a run at Dwight Howard, who is widely expected to opt out of his deal with Houston to become an unrestricted free agent. Howard is no longer the dominant physical force that he was during his tenure with the Magic, plus, he’s not a great fit for coach Mike Budenholzer‘s system. If the Hawks do pursue Howard, the only safe play is to sign him to a short-term deal, though there is no guarantee that Howard would accept such an arrangement. But inking a two-year pact that includes a player option for the second season could allow Howard to re-establish his value as well as rebuild his reputation as a teammate. This sort of arrangement would also serve to mitigate some of the risk involved on the team’s part, as big men always bring with them injury concerns and Howard already has a history of back woes.

The other area that the Hawks need to address, regardless of whether or not Bazemore is retained, is the team’s subpar outside shooting. Atlanta missed the presence of DeMarre Carroll, who departed via free agency to Toronto last summer, and the team could definitely benefit by upgrading at the wing. Tim Hardaway Jr. and Kyle Korver don’t appear to be the solution, though Hardaway did show promise during the second half of the 2015/16 campaign. But questions about his defense and shot-selection make him far from a sure thing and Korver’s production has been on the decline the past two campaigns. This franchise desperately needs to add a new body to the mix.

There are a number of potential wing upgrades expected to be on the market, including J.R. Smith, Arron Afflalo and Austin Rivers, none of whom would be a great fit in the team’s offense. The most intriguing potential target for Atlanta is Magic swingman Evan Fournier, who would be a fantastic fit in Budenholzer’s system. The 23-year-old is set to become a restricted free agent and any suitors will need to grossly overpay for his services in order to scare off the Magic, who have stated they intend to keep the Frenchman.

Draft Outlook

The Hawks own the No. 21 overall pick, as well as two second-rounders (No. 44 and No. 54) in June’s draft. While it’s difficult to predict who the team will target given the other roster decisions Atlanta will need to make, the Hawks will likely look to add frontcourt depth in the first round. Some possibilities for the Hawks include Damian Jones (Vanderbilt), Stephen Zimmerman (UNLV), Cheick Diallo (Kansas), Ante Zizic (Croatia), Brice Johnson (North Carolina) and Diamond Stone (Maryland).

All of the players I mentioned would come with question marks, but Zimmerman and Diallo would be the smartest additions given their respective upsides. Diallo has impressed scouts with his physical tools during the combine and pre-draft workouts thus far, but he is a project that Atlanta may not be able to wait on to develop. The safer pick, provided he is still on the board when Atlanta is due to select, would be Zimmerman. There are major concerns regarding his ability to defend at the NBA level, but his versatile offensive skill set makes him a good bet to develop into a prototypical stretch-four in the league.

Final Take

The Hawks are in danger of allowing themselves to be overtaken in the Eastern Conference by a number of up-and-coming teams. Much of the franchise’s cap flexibility and offseason plans depend on the decisions made regarding Horford and Bazemore. Calls that will need to be made rather quickly once the free agent signing period commences. But even if both players are retained, Atlanta doesn’t look to be an improved squad heading into the 2016/17 campaign. Barring a big name free agent deciding to take a discount to join the Hawks, the team’s best chance at improving itself is to trade either Teague or Schröder for help on the wing.

Atlanta appears to be a franchise that will be doomed to be good enough to make the playoffs, but not talented or deep enough to be considered serious contenders for the foreseeable future. This will make it difficult to rebuild since the team isn’t likely to fall far enough in the standings to nab a lottery pick. Retaining Horford and Teague would maintain continuity, but perhaps the team would be better served in the long-run to deal Teague and allow Horford to depart. The fanbase may not appreciate taking a step back, but doing so may allow the franchise to remake itself into more than just an annual playoff-qualifier.

Guaranteed Salary

Player Options

  • None

Team Options

  • Mike Muscala ($1,015,696) — salary non-guaranteed even if option picked up

Non-Guaranteed Salary

Restricted Free Agents

  • None

Unrestricted Free Agents (Cap Holds)

Other Cap Holds

  • No. 21 pick ($1,207,500)

Projected Salary Cap: $92,000,000

The Basketball Insiders salary pages were used in the creation of this post.

Hoops Rumors Originals 5/15/16-5/21/16

Here’s a look back at the original analysis generated by the Hoops Rumors staff this past week.

Poll: 2016 Community Mock Draft (Pick No. 4)

The 2016 NBA Draft lottery was held on Tuesday night and the Sixers finally landed the elusive No. 1 overall pick after missing out the past two seasons. Now that the exact draft order is locked in, teams can begin targeting specific players who are likely to still be on the board when it is their time to choose. Drafting players is far from an exact science, and many a GM has been second-guessed for his draft night decisions. I’m willing to bet that every team executive has at least one pick that he would like a mulligan for. We at Hoops Rumors thought it would be fun to give our readers the chance to predict the results of this June’s draft, which is what we intend to do with a series of polls.

With the first few picks out of the way, things have begun to get interesting. We’ll continue with the Suns, who are looking to rebuild in the tough Western Conference. Readers, you are now on the clock! Cast your vote for Phoenix’s pick and check back Monday for the results, as well as to cast your vote for who the Timberwolves will select with the No. 5 overall pick. But don’t limit yourself to a simple button click. Take to the comments section below and share your thoughts on the No. 3 overall pick and why you voted the way that you did.

Previous Selections

  1. Sixers — Ben Simmons (LSU)
  2. Lakers — Brandon Ingram (Duke)
  3. Celtics — Dragan Bender (Maccabi Tel Aviv)