Hoops Rumors Originals

Community Shootaround: Kenneth Faried

Nuggets power forward Kenneth Faried saw his playing time dip this season thanks to the emergence of big men Joffrey Lauvergne, Jusuf Nurkic and Nikola Jokic, as well as late season struggles with soreness in his back. The 26-year-old made 67 appearances for the team this season and averaged 12.5 points, 8.7 rebounds and 1.2 assists in 25.3 minutes per outing. While those numbers weren’t far off his career averages, the energetic forward didn’t appear to be a good fit in coach Michael Malone‘s offense at times, which raises some questions about his long-term future in Denver.

Faried has three years and more than $38.764MM left on the extension he signed in 2014. The forward’s salary is likely end up below market value after the expected free agent feeding frenzy that is set to occur this summer, courtesy of the significant increase in the salary cap that is set to kick in, which is good for the team. But if Faried is forced into a reserve role in the future it could prove to be a distraction if he is unwilling to accept the change, as Ben Dowsett of Basketball Insiders noted.

This brings me to today’s topic: Should the Nuggets look to trade Kenneth Faried this summer?

Take to the comments section to share your thoughts on whether or not Denver should hang onto Faried at all costs, or if you believe it is time for the team to find a new home for the player. If you are of the mind that Faried should be shipped out, regale us with your trade ideas for him. We look forward to what you have to say.

Offseason Salary Cap Digest: Portland Trail Blazers

The shortening of this year’s July moratorium from 11 days to six puts the squeeze on the Trail Blazers. Portland has enough cap flexibility to pursue max free agents or trade targets from other teams, but the Blazers have three restricted free agents who could force tough, fast decisions if they sign lucrative offer sheets on July 7th. Meyers Leonard, Maurice Harkless and Allen Crabbe were all in the rotation this season and have relatively small cap holds. Each probably warrants a salary for next season that exceeds the value of his cap hold, especially given the player-friendly market expected this summer. Their cap holds escalate the moment they either sign for raises with the Blazers or ink bloated offer sheets from other teams, so the Blazers may well be forced to cut ties with all three of them if they want to keep their options open for more prominent names, unless they can secure the verbal commitments they seek during the brief moratorium. See how Portland’s cap situation looks for 2016/17 as Hoops Rumors continues its offseason salary cap digest series.

Guaranteed Salary

Player Options

  • None

Team Options

  • None

Non-Guaranteed Salary

Restricted Free Agents (Qualifying Offers/Cap Holds)

Unrestricted Free Agents (Cap Holds)

Projected Salary Cap: $92,000,000

The Basketball Insiders salary pages were used in the creation of this post.

Download The Trade Rumors App Today

If you enjoy this website on your smartphone or tablet, you’ve got to download our free Trade Rumors app!

Trade Rumors, available for iOS and Android, is the best way to consume our content on a mobile device.  Here’s what it delivers, all for free:

  • All the articles from Hoops Rumors, MLB Trade Rumors, and Pro Football Rumors, in an easy-to-navigate, eye-catching format.  Swipe through stories to quickly consume all the news and rumors from our three sites.  Not into all three sports?  No problem – any sport can be easily removed.
  • Customize what you see.  You can create feeds for any team or player across any of our sites.
  • Notifications!  For any team or player, you can set up push notifications to ensure you always get breaking news instantly.  Notifications can also be set up at the sport level.
  • Commenting!  You can now read and contribute comments on the app seamlessly.
  • Customer service!  If you find a bug, we’ll fix it.  If you have a feature request, we’ll consider it.  The app is continually evolving and improving.
  • Did I mention Trade Rumors is a FREE app?  What do you have to lose?  Download now!

Top Bloggers: Bryan Toporek On The Sixers

Anyone can have a blog about an NBA team, but some set themselves apart from the rest with the dedication and valuable insight they bring to their craft. We’ll be sharing some knowledge from these dialed-in writers on Hoops Rumors with a feature called Top Bloggers. As with The Beat, our ongoing series of interviews with NBA beat writers, it’s part of an effort to bring Hoops Rumors readers ever closer to the pulse of the teams they follow. Last time, we spoke about the Nuggets with Adam Mares, site manager of SB Nation’s Denver StiffsClick here to see the entire Top Bloggers series.

Next up is Bryan Toporek, a Quality Editor at Bleacher Report. He’s also a contributor to BBALLBREAKDOWN, Hardwood Paroxysm, Today’s Fastbreak and Hoop 76 of the ESPN TrueHoop Network. You can follow Bryan on Twitter at @btoporek. Check out his stories here, here, here and here.

Hoops Rumors: The Sixers have been at or near the bottom of the NBA in payroll the past two seasons as part of the team’s rebuilding plan. With the increase in the salary cap that is set to occur this summer, the salary floor will also go up proportionally as a result. Philly seems unlikely to be a destination for the top free agents this offseason, so what moves do you see the team making to try and get above or close to that dubious payroll demarcation line?

Bryan Toporek: Honestly? I hope they don’t cross the salary floor. The Sixers are set to have over $60MM in cap space this offseason, and since they’re not likely to be a major free agent destination, spending all of that money on second- and third-tier players is a recipe for disaster. Overall, I believe they should follow the model the Portland Trail Blazers did last offseason: target undervalued players in their mid-20s who are on the same developmental curve as their top homegrown pieces. Since the Sixers are currently so frontcourt-heavy, they’ll need to round out their wing and guard rotation in free agency, but they should mainly go after guys who have the potential to develop into reliable 3-point shooters. Building around a Twin Towers lineup necessitates having a bevy of consistent floor-spacers, which the Sixers sorely lack at the moment.

Early on, I’d like to see them be aggressive in restricted free agency, targeting players such as Allen Crabbe, Evan Fournier and Jordan Clarkson. E’Twaun Moore has been on my wish list since January, even before the Bulls made him a starter and drove up his likely asking price. Bradley Beal‘s injury history scares me, but I wouldn’t mind floating a hefty offer his way if only to force the Wizards’ hand. I’m not wild about the prospect of maxing out Harrison Barnes, but I also wouldn’t totally hate it. The free agent point guard market is weak, so I think they’ll have to pursue a trade to fill that void. (The Hawks make sense as a logical trade partner, especially given Philly’s reported interest in Dennis Schroder at the trade deadline.) Fiscal restraint will be hard to come by this summer, but the worst thing the Sixers could do is attempt to accelerate the timeline of their rebuild by handing huge, long-term deals to players who don’t fit the team concept such as Rajon Rondo or DeMar DeRozan. If they stay below the salary floor, the only penalty is distributing the shortfall to the players on the roster, so they should pay no heed to that in free agency.

Hoops Rumors: One major criticism of former GM Sam Hinkie during his tenure was his failure to build a cohesive roster by stockpiling big men (Nerlens Noel, Joel EmbiidJahlil Okafor) instead of addressing other needs. The pairing of Noel and Okafor was not a successful one, with the two players’ skill sets not being especially complementary. With Embiid on track to finally make his NBA debut in 2016/17, the frontcourt looks to get even more crowded in a hurry. Whom do you believe the team will ultimately end up building around moving forward?

Bryan Toporek: Embiid is the one frontcourt member who has the potential to develop into a franchise cornerstone, so the hope is that he can stay healthy and avoid any further setbacks with his foot. Among the remaining bigs, Dario Saric seems like the best fit next to Embiid, as he’s a floor-spacing four with the ability to handle the ball in a pinch, too. That leaves Noel, Okafor or both as possible trade bait. At that point, it comes down to two factors for me: Which player has the higher trade value, and which player is more willing to accept a reduced role? With regard to the former, I’d assume Okafor is more highly valued around the league given his undeniable scoring ability and having three cost-controlled years left on his rookie contract (compared to just one for Noel). Personally, I’d rather have Noel coming off the bench as a rich man’s version of what Bismack Biyombo is providing Toronto this year, as his defensive instincts are second to none. Additionally, I could see him fitting better with Embiid on both ends of the court than Okafor will. I’d love it if Okafor embraced an Enes Kanter-esque role off the bench, readily dominating second-unit bigs, but I’m skeptical of that actually happening. Because Okafor’s defensive deficiencies (particularly guarding pick-and-rolls) make him more of a liability than Noel’s offensive limitations, I’d choose to trade the former and keep the latter.

Hoops Rumors: While it didn’t translate into wins, the arrival of Ish Smith in Philadelphia certainly gave the team a boost and illustrated what a glaring hole the Sixers had at the one spot. Has Smith shown enough to warrant the team re-signing him, and if so, should he be the starter next season?

Bryan Toporek: It all depends on the price. Noel loves Ish, as does Brett Brown, and for their sanity alone, I’d like to see him back in a Sixers uniform next year. That said, I’d be reluctant to give him a contract worth much more than the $5.628MM mid-level exception. He’s a career 29.8% shooter from deep, which is the exact opposite of what the Sixers need, particularly if they wind up with Ben Simmons in June. That said, he’s the Sixers’ only point guard capable of reliably feeding the post, which helps explain why the team went from cover-your-eyes awful to capable of winning the occasional game upon his arrival. Ideally, the Sixers will upgrade the point guard position this offseason, but I’d still like to see Smith brought back as a reserve, so long as the cost isn’t too prohibitive.

Hoops Rumors: It’s extremely difficult to properly judge Brown’s ability as a head coach given the lack of talent he’s had surrounding him. With the regime change that’s taken place with the Sixers, just how safe is Brown’s job?

Bryan Toporek: I don’t think it’s all that safe, which is an outright crime. Given the talent he’s had to work with over the past three years, the fact Brown coaxed 47 total wins out of those squads is remarkable. The Sixers were an above-league-average team defensively in 2014/15 despite relying on Noel and mostly D-League-caliber players. For him to keep the team mostly upbeat and engaged despite the losses rapidly piling up was a herculean task. If Hinkie were still in charge, I’d think Brown would have at least two more years of job security before ever having to worry about the hot seat. New team president Bryan Colangelo is a total wild card, though, particularly if interest in assistant coach Mike D’Antoni heats up.

Hoops Rumors: The Sixers have a 26.9% chance of landing the No. 1 overall pick (including their right to swap first-round picks with the Kings) in this year’s NBA draft lottery. Keeping in mind that Saric, who’s also a frontcourt player, is likely to head stateside in the near future, whom should the team select if it finally nabs that elusive top pick?

Bryan Toporek: Choosing between Simmons and Brandon Ingram will be incredibly tricky for any franchise, but the Sixers’ clogged frontcourt only further complicates the decision. On one hand, Ingram is the perfect fit as a floor-spacing three who can relieve some offensive pressure from the bigs. He’s the natural evolution of the direction the NBA is heading, making him a tantalizing addition to any roster. On the other, Simmons’ passing ability sets him apart as a potentially transcendent prospect. Selecting him would open the door for unconventional lineups, as it would reduce the Sixers’ need to have a ball-dominant point guard running the offense on every possession. Personally, I’m going Simmons by a hair, even though Ingram is the better fit at the moment. The Sixers not having an established point guard actually works in Simmons’ favor, as he can immediately enter the starting lineup as a true point forward. That said, I’m not throwing my remote through my TV on draft night if the Sixers do go with Ingram at No. 1. So long as they land a top-two pick at the lottery, they’re golden either way. (If they fall to fourth, though, I’m burning my apartment down.)

Hoops Rumors: Now for a trip to the hypothetical side of things. Say you were given the opportunity to go back and reverse one decision the team made over the past three seasons (trade/hire/draft pick/signing). What would you change?

Bryan Toporek: This one’s easy: I’d pick Kristaps Porzingis over Okafor at No. 3 overall last year. It was no secret that the Sixers entered the 2015 draft with their eyes on D’Angelo Russell, so when the Lakers picked him second, taking Okafor seemed like somewhat of a panic move. Sure, he seemed to have a much higher floor, but Porzingis’ skill set is a significantly better fit for the modern NBA game. I don’t think an Okafor-Noel pairing is feasible long-term, which effectively necessitates trading one in the coming years, but Noel and Porzingis would have far better complemented one another. And given Embiid’s ability to step out and knock down mid- and long-range shots, he and Porzingis could have one day ruled the league as a pair of virtually interchangeable 7-footers. Given everything that unfolded over the past year, I now can’t help but wonder if Hinkie wanted to select Porzingis over Okafor only to get overruled by team ownership.

Honorable mention goes to the hiring of Jerry Colangelo, which led to Hinkie’s resignation and the hiring of Bryan Colangelo as team president. The Okafor-over-Porzingis decision likely played a role in that, though, particularly considering the string of negative off-court incidents that the Duke product endured early in the season.

Chuck Myron contributed to this interview.

Community Shootaround: Top Executive

On Monday, the NBA announced that Spurs GM R.C. Buford won the Executive of the Year award. It was the second time in three years that Buford has come away with the honor, for which fellow team executives vote. Trail Blazers GM Neil Olshey finished a close second, beating Buford in first-place votes 10-9 but falling short in the balloting system that gives five points for every first-place vote, three points for second-place votes and one point for third-place votes.

Listed below is how each vote-getter ranked, with first-place votes noted where applicable:

1. R.C. Buford (Spurs) — 9
2. Neil Olshey (Trail Blazers) — 10
3. Bob Myers (Warriors) — 5
4. Masai Ujiri (Raptors) — 2
5. Rich Cho (Hornets) — 1
6. Danny Ainge (Celtics) — 1
7. David Griffin (Cavaliers)
8(tie). Stan Van Gundy (Pistons)
8(tie). Pat Riley (Heat)
10(tie). Sam Presti (Thunder) — 1
10(tie). Sam Hinkie (Sixers)
12(tie). Wes Wilcox (Hawks)
12(tie). John Hammond (Bucks)
12(tie). Dennis Lindsey (Jazz)

Today’s topic is a straightforward one: Who deserved to win the NBA’s Executive of the Year award for 2015/16?

Did the executives around the league get it right with their selection of Buford? Or is there another candidate whom you strongly believe should have gotten the nod, and if so, why? Take to the comments section to share with us your thoughts and opinions on the subject. We look forward to what you have to say.

Submit Your Questions For Hoops Rumors Mailbag

In addition to our regular weekly chat, which we host every Wednesday, we have a second opportunity for you to hit us up with your questions in our weekly mailbag feature, which is posted on Sunday.

Have a question regarding player movement, free agent rumors, the salary cap, the NBA draft, or the top storylines of the week? You can e-mail them here: hoopsrumorsmailbag@gmail.com. Feel free to send emails throughout the week, but please be mindful that we may receive a sizable number of questions and might not get to all of them.

2015/16 D-League Usage Report: Clippers

The NBA’s relationship with the D-League continues to grow, and this season a total of 19 NBA teams have one-to-one affiliations with D-League clubs. Those NBA organizations without their own affiliates were required to assign players to D-League clubs associated with other NBA franchises. D-League teams could volunteer to take on the assigned players, and if no volunteers emerged, the players were assigned at random.

This significant change from the 2014/15 season came about after the Pacers purchased the Fort Wayne Mad Ants and turned them into their one-to-one partner for the 2015/16 campaign. Other NBA teams have interest in following suit in the years ahead, and the NBA’s ultimate goal for the D-League is for all 30 NBA franchises to have their own D-League squads. You can view the complete list of D-League affiliates here.

We at Hoops Rumors will be recapping the D-League-related activity for the 2015/16 campaign for each team and we’ll continue with the Los Angeles Clippers, one of the 11 NBA franchises without their own D-League affiliate:


The Clippers made eight assignments for the 2015/16 season, sending two players to the D-League for a total of 165 days. Listed below are all the assignments and recalls made by Los Angeles for the 2015/16 campaign:


Here is how the Clippers’ players performed while on assignment to the D-League this season:

  • Branden Dawson: In 29 games, Dawson averaged 10.3 points, 4.9 rebounds and 1.0 assist in 21.1 minutes per outing. His shooting line was .518/.444/.576.
  • C.J. Wilcox: In 21 appearances, Wilcox averaged 18.6 points, 3.9 rebounds and 2.8 assists in 32.7 minutes per night. His shooting line was .458/.417/.836.

Hoops Rumors Chat Transcript

4:02pm: Click here to read the chat transcript.

3:00pm: Two more coaching jobs opened in the NBA within the past week, but the broadest coaching search came to a sudden end. Dave Joerger was unemployed for barely 48 hours, bouncing from his Grizzlies firing into the Kings vacancy. Frank Vogel hasn’t rebounded from his Pacers dismissal quite so quickly, but he appears to be the front-runner to replace Joerger in Memphis. Meanwhile, the Rockets and Knicks are taking divergent approaches to filling their openings, with Houston conducting a wide-ranging search while New York keeps its list short. We can talk about all of this plus free agency, the draft and the playoffs in today’s chat.

Offseason Outlook: Indiana Pacers

Hoops Rumors is looking ahead to offseason moves for all 30 teams. We’ll examine free agency, the draft, trades and other key storylines for each franchise as the summer approaches.

Brian Spurlock / USA TODAY Sports Images

Brian Spurlock / USA TODAY Sports Images

Coaching Search

It’ll be interesting to see whether president of basketball operations Larry Bird holds himself accountable in the same fashion by which he held Frank Vogel to a dauntingly high standard. If so, he’ll have to nail the search for Vogel’s replacement. Among the legitimate candidates, Nate McMillan and Brian Shaw have Pacers ties, but their track records don’t favor the go-go style Bird seems to want. Count Mike Woodson squarely in the stagnant-offense group, too. Jim Boylen was to help speed up the Bulls offense as an assistant this year, but that experiment flopped. Mike D’Antoni helped forge the NBA’s small-ball revolution, but it’s fair to question whether Bird wants to deal with a strong personality like his. The same goes for Mark Jackson, though he and Bird had a successful working relationship as player and coach.

Jeff Hornacek is much more understated and did masterful work with a two-headed point guard look his first year in Phoenix. Randy Wittman ratcheted up the Wizards offense to the fifth-highest pace in the league this season, according to NBA.com, and the Indiana native would help win over a fanbase skeptical of the Vogel firing. Hornacek and Wittman are the best fits in the running thus far.

What Happened To Ty Lawson?

Transitioning to a quicker attack is about more than finding the right coach. The Pacers lost two starting-caliber big men from their 2014/15 team but replaced Roy Hibbert and David West with only one proven starting option on the perimeter in Monta Ellis, so Bird needs to use the ample cap flexibility at his disposal to make at least one major addition. An outside chance exists that the upgrade is one the team already made when it signed Lawson in March. A foot injury he suffered five minutes into his first game with the Pacers knocked him out for two weeks, and he never became a major contributor, essentially falling out of the rotation late in Indiana’s first-round series against Toronto.

Perhaps Lawson failed to deliver because Vogel didn’t give him enough of a chance, or maybe the blame rests with Lawson, who didn’t succeed with the Rockets, either. Regardless, the speedy point guard is only 28 and just a year removed from averaging 15.2 points and 9.6 assists per game for the Nuggets. He may well prove one of the few value plays on the free agent market this summer if he takes the right approach and has the right voices in his ear. If so, and the Pacers re-sign him, he’d be the missing piece in the starting lineup, with everyone else sliding down a position. Of course, that assumes Paul George would be more receptive to guarding power forwards than he was at the beginning of this past season, but maybe the right coach can either convince him or devise lineup combinations that would limit his time at the four.

Free Agent Targets

The Pacers are set to open plenty of cap room, and just how much flexibility they’ll have will come down to whether they’re willing to keep Ian Mahinmi and give him the significant raise it would take for them to do so. Bird is duly impressed with Myles Turner, and a decent chance exists that the rookie’s strong performance this season was enough to convince the Pacers to let Mahinmi walk and turn the starting center position over to the 20-year-old from Texas. Such a move would free money for the Pacers to go hard after the perimeter player of their choice.

Indianapolis native Mike Conley would be an obvious candidate, though one for whom the Pacers would have fervent competition. Harrison Barnes would appear to be a strong fit, no stranger to a modern, souped-up offense, and he’s just the sort of perimeter player who could guard power forwards and let George play the three. Still, his free agency is restricted, and it may well take the max, or close to it, to convince the Warriors not to match. Nicolas Batum‘s free agency will be unrestricted, but it seems like he’ll be tough to pry from Charlotte. Plugging Luol Deng into the same small-ball power forward role in which he’s thrived with Miami would represent a cheaper and more feasible alternative, and the Pacers could always attempt to crack the riddle that is Jeff Green.

Potential Trades

Another way to use cap space is to absorb players into it via trade, and the Pacers could revisit their reported discussion with the Hawks about Jeff Teague. Still, plenty of teams figure to call Atlanta about either Teague or Dennis Schröder, driving up the price. Bird and company could see what it would take to trade for Derrick Rose if they’re willing to overpay him for a season before his contract runs out. Ricky Rubio‘s name comes up frequently in trade rumors, though newly minted Wolves executive Tom Thibodeau is a wild card. The Pacers have all their future draft picks to offer up, but they’d probably have a tough time finding a taker for anyone on the roster who isn’t part of their core.

Draft Outlook

  • First-round picks: 20th
  • Second-round picks: 50th

The Pacers have four players taken in the last two drafts plus undrafted developmental player Shayne Whittington, but only Turner sees meaningful minutes. The Pacers probably trade this pick if Bird doesn’t identify someone at No. 20 who’d motivate him to move on from Whittington, Joe Young or Glenn Robinson III. Perhaps Baylor small forward Taurean Prince, who played four years of college ball, would contribute immediately for Indiana if he were the pick here. Indiana’s second-rounder is in a prime spot for the always cost-conscious Pacers to trade it for cash.

Other Decisions

Bird said he wouldn’t rule out re-signing Solomon Hill, but the ill-fated decision to decline his team option for next season sharply limits what the Pacers can offer him and almost certainly closes off the possibility of him remaining with Indiana. Fellow soon-to-be free agent Jordan Hill was an efficient rebounder, as usual, but Vogel went away from him during the stretch run and the playoffs, and he doesn’t seem a fit for a new coach’s faster style, either. The non-guaranteed salaries of Robinson and Whittington become fully guaranteed on August 1st, so the moves Indiana makes in the draft and free agency, rather than their training camp performances, will decide their fate.

Final Take

Bird seems impatient for the team to return to the Eastern Conference elite, and it’s tough to blame him for wanting a more unified focus than the team had this past season. Still, Vogel did a splendid job with a roster in the midst of transition. The team’s cap flexibility means it’ll probably have better players next season, but they risk offsetting the upgrade to their lineup with an inferior coach.

Guaranteed Salary

Player Options

  • None

Team Options

  • None

Non-Guaranteed Salary

Restricted Free Agents

  • None

Unrestricted Free Agents (Cap Holds)

Other Cap Holds

  • No. 20 pick ($1,301,900)

Projected Salary Cap: $92,000,000

Footnotes:

  1. The Pacers can’t re-sign Hill to a contract with a starting salary worth more than the amount listed here because they declined their team option on his rookie scale contract.

The Basketball Insiders salary pages were used in the creation of this post.

Community Shootaround: Coaches In Jeopardy

One of the most difficult aspects of being an NBA coach is that they have frighteningly very little job security. The pay is certainly good, but in a player-driven league, the first person to shoulder the blame when things head south for a team is its coach. In fact, there have been 11 franchises that have made a change since we last ranked NBA head coaches by the length of their respective tenures this past August. On Monday, Chuck Myron of Hoops Rumors ran down the list of the longest-tenured coaches in the league, which for convenience, I’ve posted below:

  1. Gregg Popovich, Spurs: December 1996
  2. Erik Spoelstra, Heat: April 2008
  3. Rick Carlisle, Mavericks: May 2008
  4. Dwane Casey, Raptors: June 2011
  5. Terry Stotts, Trail Blazers: August 2012
  6. Mike Budenholzer, Hawks: May 2013
  7. Steve Clifford, Hornets: May 2013
  8. Doc Rivers, Clippers: June 2013
  9. Brad Stevens, Celtics: July 2013
  10. Brett Brown, Sixers: August 2013
  11. Stan Van Gundy, Pistons: May 2014
  12. Steve Kerr, Warriors: May 2014
  13. Quin Snyder, Jazz: June 2014
  14. Jason Kidd, Bucks: July 2014
  15. Billy Donovan, Thunder: April 30th, 2015
  16. Scott Skiles, Magic: May 29th, 2015
  17. Alvin Gentry, Pelicans: May 31st, 2015 (remained Warriors assistant through playoffs)
  18. Fred Hoiberg, Bulls: June 2nd, 2015
  19. Michael Malone, Nuggets: June 15th, 2015
  20. Tyronn Lue, Cavaliers: January 22nd, 2016
  21. Earl Watson, Suns: February 1st, 2016
  22. Kurt Rambis, Knicks: February 8th, 2016 (interim coach)
  23. Kenny Atkinson, Nets: April 17th, 2016 (Hawks assistant through Atlanta’s playoff run)
  24. Tom Thibodeau, Timberwolves: April 20th, 2016
  25. Scott Brooks, Wizards: April 26th, 2016
  26. Luke Walton, Lakers: April 29th, 2016 (Warriors assistant until end of Golden State’s season)
  27. Dave Joerger, Kings: May 9th, 2016

Note: The Grizzlies, Pacers and Rockets head coaching posts have yet to be filled.

For today’s topic: Which current NBA coach do you believe is likeliest to be fired next?

Take to the comments section to share with us and your fellow readers which NBA coach you believe will be the next to be issued his walking papers, justified or not. We look forward to what you have to say.