Hoops Rumors Originals

Community Shootaround: NBA’s 2023/24 Hierarchy

August 1st, 2023 at 12:37pm CST by Tristan Tucker

With free agency winding down, we have a clearer idea of what teams are going to look like for the 2023/24 season. Of course, there is still plenty of time between now and the start of training camps in late September, but many teams seem to be nearly regular-season-ready.

A clearer idea of what next season’s rosters will look like means a consensus should start to emerge on where teams stand in the NBA’s pecking order. However, it appears as though most teams in the league are trending toward building for the playoffs. Only a handful of clubs look like they’re planning on prioritizing youth development over a 2024 playoff appearance.

The Wizards sent off former franchise mainstay Bradley Beal this summer in the first of what became a series of deals that look to have Washington resetting its roster. Players like re-signed forward Kyle Kuzma and new additions Jordan Poole and Tyus Jones could keep Washington competitive, but the franchise lacks an All-Star to build around.

Teams like Detroit, San Antonio, Charlotte and Orlando are built around young cores, but there’s a sense that all four franchises will improve on their previous seasons.

Of course, the elephants in the room are the potential Damian Lillard and James Harden deals that would shake up the league’s hierarchy.

If Portland sends out Lillard, it likely means the franchise is planning for an all-out rebuild. However, the Trail Blazers were a competitive team for much of last season and, if they convince Lillard to stay, they could talk themselves into being a playoff contender. On the other hand, if Lillard ended up in Miami, his preferred destination, it would likely place the Heat among the top two or three teams in the Eastern Conference. The Heat are fresh off an NBA Finals appearance but lost veteran starters Gabe Vincent and Max Strus to free agency.

As for a potential Harden trade, the Clippers are the reported frontrunner for Harden is he’s dealt. Adding Harden likely moves the Clippers into the upper echelon of the Western Conference, though they’re a probable playoff team as is. Same goes for the Sixers. With or without Harden, Philadelphia likely sees itself in the playoffs.

The implementation of the Play-In Tournament means teams are more incentivized than ever to be competitive, especially after a play-in team in Miami made the Finals last year. Teams like Utah, Minnesota, Oklahoma City, Houston, Dallas, New Orleans, Indiana, Atlanta, Chicago, Toronto and Brooklyn seem like they could go either way. For example, the Rockets committed significant money to win-now pieces like Fred VanVleet and Dillon Brooks in free agency but still have several young players to develop.

Then there are the teams at the top. The Suns added Beal to a star-studded core but turned over a huge chunk of their roster and may lack continuity. The Nuggets are in good position to win the conference again but lost Bruce Brown in free agency. The Celtics added Kristaps Porzingis but shipped out Marcus Smart. The Bucks re-signed Khris Middleton and Brook Lopez but lost in the first round last year.

Beyond the obvious names, the Knicks and Cavaliers appear to have made on-paper improvements while the Lakers, Grizzlies, Kings and Warriors could pop out in the West.

Despite knowing what rosters will look like for the most part, there seems to be plenty of variability between every team in each conference.

That leads us to our Community Shootaround discussion topic of the day: Which teams in each conference do you consider the best bets to make the postseason? Which surprise teams will make the playoffs? Who do you think will come out of each conference on top?

Let us know what you think by taking to the comments of this post.

Community Shootaround: Knicks’ Offseason

July 30th, 2023 at 7:51pm CST by Dana Gauruder

The Knicks, buoyed by the free agent acquisition of Jalen Brunson, had one of their best seasons in the last two decades. They won 47 regular season games, defeated Cleveland in the first round of the playoffs and lost to eventual Eastern Conference champion Miami in the Eastern Conference semifinals.

Now, the plan is to keep the momentum going into next season. Compared to last summer, the Knicks have had a relatively quiet offseason.

Perhaps the biggest offseason development was Josh Hart picking up his player option of $12.9MM, a somewhat surprising move that kept the valuable contributor off the market. He could eventually sign a lucrative extension.

The biggest offseason acquisition was guard Donte DiVincenzo, another all-around stat stuffer who was signed to a four-year deal via the mid-level exception.

New York also resolved the Obi Toppin dilemma by dealing him to Indiana. The former lottery pick could get more playing time with the Pacers after getting stuck behind Julius Randle in the Knicks’ pecking order.

DiVincenzo is a nice rotation pickup but not the star that some fans are hoping the front office will add. While the Knicks have been linked to some big names in recent months — Zach LaVine, Karl-Anthony Towns, Donovan Mitchell, among others — it appears the Knicks are content to run it back with a couple of tweaks.

Still, it’s tough to think the Knicks are done, if only because Evan Fournier is still on the roster. He’s essentially on an expiring contract, considering his $19MM salary for 2024/25 includes a club option. Fournier has no future in New York and expects to be off the roster before opening night.

The leads us to today’s topic: What do you think of the Knicks’ offseason thus far? Are they good enough to contend for the Eastern Conference title or should they make a big move to improve their chances?

Take to the comments section to weigh in on this topic. We look forward to your input.

How 2024 Cap Increase Will Determine Value Of Brown’s Record-Setting Contract

July 29th, 2023 at 3:31pm CST by Luke Adams

When Jaylen Brown agreed to a five-year, super-max extension with the Celtics, it was widely reported to be a $304MM deal. That number is subject to change though, since the value of the contract will depend on the value of the NBA’s 2024/25 salary cap, which won’t be officially determined until next June.

Brown’s contract will start at 35% of the ’24/25 cap and will feature 8% annual raises after that.

The $304MM estimate for Brown’s super-max deal is based on a projected salary cap increase of 10%. The NBA and NBPA have agreed not to increase the cap by more than 10% per year in order to avoid a repeat of the 2016 offseason, when a 34.5% bump helped create a Warriors super-team and resulted in a number of regrettable contracts for other teams around the league.

With that ceiling in mind, a 10% cap increase next summer would represent a best-case scenario for Brown. But it’s also a realistic outcome — the cap has risen by 10% in each of the past two offseasons, so it’s forecasting it to happen again is certainly within reason.

If the cap were to increase 10% for 2024/25, Brown’s contract would look like this:

Year	Salary
2024/25	$52,368,050
2025/26	$56,557,494
2026/27	$60,746,938
2027/28	$64,936,382
2028/29	$69,125,826
Total	$303,734,690

Of course, the NBA hasn’t actually formally projected a 10% cap increase for 2024/25, so it’s a little early to lock in those figures for Brown.

If the cap were to instead increase by a more modest 5%, his deal would instead look like this:

Year	Salary
2024/25	$49,987,700
2025/26	$53,986,716
2026/27	$57,985,732
2027/28	$61,984,748
2028/29	$65,983,764
Total	$289,928,660

In either case, Brown’s contract would become the richest deal in NBA history, comfortably surpassing Nikola Jokic‘s five-year, $276,122,630 deal that begins in 2023/24. The only scenario in which Brown’s extension wouldn’t exceed Jokic’s is if the salary cap doesn’t increase at all in a year — then Brown’s deal would look exactly the same as Jokic’s.

A lot could happen in the next 11 months, but it would require very unusual circumstances for the cap not to rise at all. Since 2010, that has only happened amidst shortened seasons (due to a lockout and the COVID-19 pandemic). So we can confidently project Brown’s contract to be worth more than Jokic’s.

For what it’s worth, Brown won’t be the only player earning 35% of the cap in 2024/25. Devin Booker and Karl-Anthony Towns also signed super-max contracts that will go into effect a year from now, and their deals will look exactly the same as Brown’s from 2024-28. The only reason those aren’t considered record-setting contracts in their own right is because they’ll cover four years instead of five, since Booker and Towns signed extensions with two years left on their respective contracts rather than just one.

Of course, even Brown’s record is unlikely to stand for long. With an in-season tournament being introduced later this year and a new media rights deal around the corner, the NBA’s revenue and salary cap will likely only continue to grow in the coming years.

Brown’s Celtics teammate Jayson Tatum, who met the super-max performance criteria this spring and will meet the service time criteria in 2024, is the best bet to be the next recipient of the richest contract in league history. If the cap increases by 10% next year and another 10% in 2025, this is what a super-max deal for Tatum could look like:

Year	Salary
2025/26	$57,604,750
2026/27	$62,213,130
2027/28	$66,821,510
2028/29	$71,429,890
2029/30	$76,038,270
Total	$334,107,550

Hoops Rumors Glossary: Mid-Level Exception

July 29th, 2023 at 2:29pm CST by Luke Adams

The mid-level exception is the most common way for over-the-cap NBA teams to sign free agents from other clubs for more than the minimum salary. It helps ensure that virtually every team heads into the offseason with a little spending flexibility.

Teams are eligible to use specific types of mid-level exceptions depending on their proximity to the salary cap. The most lucrative form of mid-level is available to teams that are over the cap but below the first tax apron. Clubs above the first apron, and even those operating under the cap, have access to lesser versions of the MLE.

Here’s a breakdown of how the various forms of the exception are structured:

For teams over the cap and below the first tax apron:

Commonly called either the full mid-level exception or the non-taxpayer mid-level exception.
Contract can cover up to four seasons.
First-year salary is worth $12,405,000 in 2023/24; maximum four-year value is $53,341,500.
Once used, the team cannot surpass the first tax apron (approximately $7MM above the tax line in 2023/24) for the remainder of the season.
Beginning in 2024/25, this form of mid-level exception can be used to acquire a non-free-agent via trade or waiver claim, as long as his contract fits into the exception (in terms of years and dollars). Only the player’s current-year salary must fit into the MLE.

For teams operating under the cap:

Commonly called the room exception.
Contract can cover no more than three seasons.
First-year salary is worth $7,723,000 in 2023/24; maximum three-year value is $24,327,450.
Beginning in 2024/25, this form of mid-level exception can be used to acquire a non-free-agent via trade or waiver claim, as long as his contract fits into the exception (in terms of years and dollars). Only the player’s current-year salary must fit into the room exception.

For teams over the cap and the first tax apron, but below the second apron:

Commonly called the taxpayer mid-level exception.
Contract can cover up to two seasons.
First-year salary is worth $5,000,000 in 2023/24; maximum two-year value is $10,250,000.
Once used, the team cannot surpass the second tax apron ($17.5MM above the tax line in 2023/24) for the remainder of the season.

For teams over the cap and both tax aprons:

No mid-level exception is available.

Each form of the mid-level allows for annual raises of up to 5% of the value of the first season’s salary.

Teams can use their entire mid-level exception to sign one player. However, only one club has taken this route so far in 2023/24, with the Raptors signing Dennis Schröder to a multiyear contract that’s worth $12,405,000 in year one.

Teams are also allowed to split the mid-level among multiple players, and that has become an increasingly common course of action. For instance, the Mavericks have used their MLE to sign Seth Curry ($4MM) and Dante Exum ($3MM) so far in ’23/24 and still have more than $5MM remaining.

In the past, players drafted in the second round often signed contracts using a portion of the mid-level because the exception allows teams to offer more years and more money than the minimum salary exception provides. However, the new second-round pick exception has all but eliminated the need for teams to use the MLE on second-round picks.

Still, if a team wants to sign an undrafted free agent to a longer-term contract or convert a two-way player to a multiyear deal, the mid-level can come in handy. The Pelicans used their MLE this summer to move E.J. Liddell from his two-way deal to a three-year contract that begins at the minimum ($1,801,769).

Some front offices prefer to leave all or part of their mid-level exception unused in the offseason so it’s still available during the second half of the regular season. At that point, a contender could dangle its MLE in an effort to outbid rivals for top players on the buyout market. A non-contending club, on the other hand, could use its MLE to lock up an intriguing developmental player to a long-term contract.

Unlike the bi-annual exception, the mid-level exception can be used every season. So whether or not a team uses any of its mid-level in 2023/24, each club below the second tax apron in ’24/25 will have the opportunity to use some form of the MLE.

The amount of each form of mid-level exception increases – or decreases – at the same rate as the salary cap, ensuring that its value relative to cap room remains about the same from year to year. So if the salary cap rises by 10%, the mid-level values would rise by the same amount.

Here are a few more notes related to the mid-level exception:

A contract signed using a mid-level exception can include bonuses as long as the player’s maximum potential compensation doesn’t exceed the maximum value of the exception. For example, in 2023/24, a team can’t sign a player to a contract using the non-taxpayer mid-level exception that has a base salary of $12,405,000 and another $1MM in incentives. But a contract with a base salary of $11,405,000 and $1MM in incentives is permitted.
A team is only allowed to use one form of mid-level exception in a given season. For instance, an over-the-cap club that uses a portion of its non-taxpayer mid-level exception before shedding salary and dipping below the cap would not then be permitted to use the room exception.
On the day after the trade deadline, the value of a team’s unused mid-level exception begins to prorate downward. The exact amount of proration depends on how much of the MLE was unused as of January 10 and how many total days there are in the regular season. For example, if a team had $3MM of its mid-level left on January 10 and there are 174 days in that season, the MLE would decrease in value by $17,241 per day (1/174th of $3MM).

Note: This is a Hoops Rumors Glossary entry. Our glossary posts will explain specific rules relating to trades, free agency, or other aspects of the NBA’s Collective Bargaining Agreement. Larry Coon’s Salary Cap FAQ was used in the creation of this post.

Earlier versions of this post were published in previous years.

Community Shootaround: Most Underrated Available Free Agent

July 29th, 2023 at 12:01pm CST by Tristan Tucker

Nearly a full month into free agency, the number of impact free agents is dwindling by the day. Veterans like P.J. Washington, Christian Wood and Kelly Oubre are among the most notable players still on the market — they would be fits for most contenders and have each been linked to numerous teams. However, beyond the big names, there are several free agents who made positive impacts on their respective clubs and likely wouldn’t cost much.

Some available free agents include players who began the offseason on teams but were cut, either for financial or fit reasons, including Edmond Sumner, Trendon Watford and Lamar Stevens. Sumner and Stevens are the players with the most NBA experience out of this group, holding 161 and 165 games of experience respectively. Sumner averaged 7.1 points for the Nets last year after missing the 2021/22 season with an Achilles injury while Stevens went undrafted in 2020 but evolved into a key rotation player for the Cavaliers, averaging 5.3 points in three seasons there and making 38 starts.

Watford, on the other hand, has appeared in 110 NBA games after going undrafted in 2021. While he flew under the radar as a member of retooling Trail Blazers squads, he showed quite a bit of promise in two seasons in Portland, so it was somewhat surprising to see him go. Watford averaged 7.5 points and 4.0 rebounds in two seasons in Portland.

Then there are other free agents who have outright gone unsigned to this point. As we wrote yesterday, Derrick Jones Jr. is the only player who is still available after turning down an option for 2023/24. Jones is a high-flying forward who is still just 26 years old despite holding seven years of NBA experience.

Javonte Green is another Bulls free agent who could appeal to teams. Green has 186 games of NBA experience and started in 45 of his 65 appearances in ’21/22 for the Bulls. Meanwhile, Hamidou Diallo is another high-flying athlete who remains available after averaging 8.6 points across 263 career appearances in Oklahoma City and Detroit. He will be just 25 when the season begins.

Other available relatively young players who have proven themselves in past NBA seasons include Kendrick Nunn, who averaged 15.0 points in two seasons with Miami, Jaylen Nowell, who has reportedly drawn interest from the Mavericks, and Terence Davis, who averaged 10.4 points for Sacramento in ’21/22.

Regardless of what teams are looking for, there remain a plethora of options. If clubs are looking to fill out their rosters with veterans, players like George Hill, Will Barton, Danny Green, Ish Smith, JaMychal Green, Terrence Ross and T.J. Warren are available. If teams are looking for high-upside options, guys like Frank Ntilikina, Kevin Knox, Justise Winslow and Romeo Langford are available as former lottery picks who are all 27 or younger. Other guys who flew under the radar last season but impressed in brief stints include Lindy Waters, Jeenathan Williams and Skylar Mays.

Lastly, teams aren’t limited to guys who finished last season on NBA teams. Players like Lance Stephenson and Glenn Robinson III are reportedly seeking NBA comebacks. Ben McLemore, Dion Waiters and Stanley Johnson are some of the other players who fit this bill as guys who either worked out for teams or could hold some appeal as options to fill the bench.

That brings us to our Community Shootaround question(s) of the day: Who do you think is the most overlooked player who is still available in free agency? What teams do you think should sign these players? Is there anyone we missed?

Let us know what you think by sharing your thoughts in the comments section. We look forward to hearing what you think.

20 NBA Teams Still Have Open Two-Way Contract Slots

July 29th, 2023 at 8:08am CST by Luke Adams

Prior to this offseason, NBA teams were limited to carrying two players apiece on two-way contracts, meaning there could never be more than 60 players on two-way deals across the NBA.

Currently, there are 65 players on two-way contracts, but 25 slots remain available. That’s because the new Collective Bargaining Agreement increased the two-way limit from two players to three, raising the league-wide maximum from 60 to 90.

A few teams have still moved fairly quickly to fill all three of their two-way contract slots, but others are taking their time, leaving a spot or two open even after the conclusion of Summer League as they continue to weigh their options. Those clubs may be more inclined to invite a small group of players to training camp on Exhibit 10 contracts and then convert the standout(s) to a two-way deal.

With the help of our two-way contract tracker, here are the details on which teams still have two-way slots available:

Two two-way slots available:

Golden State Warriors
Los Angeles Clippers
New Orleans Pelicans
Oklahoma City Thunder
Phoenix Suns

Every team in the NBA has signed at least one player to a two-way contract – or carried one over from last season – but these five clubs still have a pair of two-way slots open.

For what it’s worth, the Suns won’t have a G League affiliate for the 2023/24 season, so of these five teams, they’re the best bet not to fill all three of their two-way spots.

One two-way slot available:

Atlanta Hawks *
Boston Celtics
Brooklyn Nets
Dallas Mavericks
Detroit Pistons
Houston Rockets
Memphis Grizzlies
Miami Heat *
Milwaukee Bucks
Minnesota Timberwolves *
Orlando Magic
Portland Trail Blazers
Sacramento Kings
San Antonio Spurs
Washington Wizards

The teams marked with an asterisk (*) still have a two-way qualifying offer on the table for a restricted free agent and would have three full two-way slots if those QOs are accepted. Those RFAs are Trent Forrest (Hawks), Jamal Cain (Heat), and Matt Ryan (Timberwolves).

The other 12 of these 15 clubs simply have a pair of players on two-way contracts and one open slot.

All two-way slots filled:

Charlotte Hornets *
Chicago Bulls *
Cleveland Cavaliers
Denver Nuggets
Indiana Pacers
Los Angeles Lakers
New York Knicks
Philadelphia 76ers
Toronto Raptors
Utah Jazz

Because two-way contracts don’t count against the cap and feature such modest guarantees (no more than $75K until the start of the regular season), there’s still plenty of flexibility for these 10 teams that have filled all three of their two-way slots. If they decide there’s another player they want to bring in on a two-way deal, they’d simply waive one of their current guys.

That may be especially necessary for the Hornets and Bulls, who still have two-way qualifying offers on the table for Theo Maledon and Terry Taylor, respectively. If Maledon and Terry accept their QOs, Charlotte and Chicago would have to waive a two-way player, since they wouldn’t be permitted to carry four at a time.

Categories:
Hoops Rumors Originals

Just One Player Who Declined 2023/24 Option Remains Unsigned

July 28th, 2023 at 12:51pm CST by Luke Adams

Leading up to last month’s June 29 deadline, nine of the veterans who held player options for the 2023/24 season decided to turn down those options, forgoing guaranteed money in favor of the open market.

For the vast majority of those nine players, opting out was the right call.

[RELATED: 2023 NBA Free Agent Tracker]

Fred VanVleet, Draymond Green, Khris Middleton, and Kyle Kuzma landed some of the biggest free agent contracts of 2023. While Green and Middleton technically would’ve earned higher salaries in 2023/24 if they’d opted in, they both locked in multiyear contracts that extend well beyond next season, securing overall guarantees worth $100MM and $95MM, respectively.

Donte DiVincenzo and Jevon Carter got big raises for next season and gained long-term security by opting out. DiVincenzo landed a four-year, $47MM deal after declining a $4.7MM option, while Carter passed on a minimum-salary option in favor of a three-year, $19.5MM contract.

Bruce Brown will earn $22MM in 2023/24 instead of the $6.8MM he would have earned if he had picked up his player option with Denver. Although Brown didn’t receive guaranteed money beyond ’23/24, that’s still a huge win for a player whose career earnings prior to this offseason totaled about $15MM.

Even Montrezl Harrell, who signed a new minimum-salary contract with the Sixers earlier this month, is coming out ahead, since he’ll make more on his new deal ($2,891,467) than he would have if he had exercised his option ($2,760,026).

That leaves just one unsigned player out of the nine who declined player options in June: Derrick Jones Jr.

Jones’ decision was a bit of a surprise, since he said in an April interview that he intended to pick up his $3.36MM player option in order to return to the Bulls. Two months later, word broke that the veteran wing had actually decided to turn it down and would be entering free agency.

Jones has been the subject of a few rumors this month, including being linked to the Mavericks a couple weeks ago. But the fact that he doesn’t yet have a deal in place doesn’t bode especially well for his chances of earning a raise. At this point in the summer, not many players are signing for more than the veteran’s minimum, though Dallas does have the ability to offer a higher starting salary.

Perhaps Jones, who played for the Heat for two-and-a-half seasons from 2017-20, might be interested in taking the Josh Richardson route and returning to his old team in Miami on a minimum-salary deal. But the Heat are in a holding pattern with free agents until they determine one way or another whether they’ll be making a deal for Damian Lillard this offseason.

There’s still a possibility that Jones could sign for more than the $3.36MM he would’ve earned if he had opted in with the Bulls. And even if he has to settle for a minimum-salary contract, it wouldn’t be the end of the world — that sort of deal would pay him $2.7MM, which isn’t far off from the $3.2MM he earned this past season. But that outcome would make him the only one of the nine players who declined options to end up with less guaranteed money than what his option called for.

2023/24 Non-Guaranteed Contracts By Team

July 27th, 2023 at 8:01am CST by Luke Adams

As the NBA regular season approaches and teams reduce their rosters from the 21-player offseason limit to the 15-man regular season max, the best way to determine which players will survive preseason cuts is to consider their contracts. Players with guaranteed salaries for 2023/24 are far more likely to earn spots on 15-man rosters than players whose contracts aren’t fully guaranteed.

Keeping that in mind, we’re using the space below to keep tabs on the players on each NBA team who don’t have fully guaranteed contracts. The players listed here have non-guaranteed salaries, partially guaranteed salaries, or Exhibit 9 or Exhibit 10 contracts, which essentially function like non-guaranteed deals.

Unless otherwise noted, these players are on minimum-salary contracts. Some players on this list have partial guarantees, which we’ve also mentioned below.

Not all of these players will be waived before the regular season begins, so we’ll maintain this list for the next several months, up until January 10, 2024. That’s the day that all players still under contract will have their salaries fully guaranteed for the rest of the 2023/24 season.

Only players who have formally signed contracts are listed below, so if a player has reportedly reached an agreement with a team on a non-guaranteed deal, we’ll add him to our list when that deal becomes official and we confirm the details.

Without further ado, here’s the full list of players without fully guaranteed salaries for 2023/24, broken down by team:

Updated 1-10-24 (5:42am CT)

Atlanta Hawks

None

Boston Celtics

None

Brooklyn Nets

None

Charlotte Hornets

None

Chicago Bulls

None

Cleveland Cavaliers

None

Dallas Mavericks

None

Denver Nuggets

None

Detroit Pistons

None

Golden State Warriors

None

Houston Rockets

None

Indiana Pacers

None

Los Angeles Clippers

None

Los Angeles Lakers

None

Memphis Grizzlies

None

Miami Heat

None

Milwaukee Bucks

None

Minnesota Timberwolves

None

New Orleans Pelicans

None

New York Knicks

None

Oklahoma City Thunder

None

Orlando Magic

None

Philadelphia 76ers

None

Phoenix Suns

None

Portland Trail Blazers

None

Sacramento Kings

None

San Antonio Spurs

None

Toronto Raptors

None

Utah Jazz

None

Washington Wizards

None

Categories:
Hoops Rumors Originals

Hoops Rumors Glossary: No-Trade Clause

July 26th, 2023 at 12:13pm CST by Luke Adams

It’s not uncommon in many major professional sports for a player to negotiate a contract that includes a no-trade clause, which prohibits him from being traded – either at all or to certain specific teams – without his consent. However, no-trade clauses are extremely rare in the NBA.

When the Wizards signed Bradley Beal to a new contract in 2022 that included a no-trade clause, Beal became just the 10th player in NBA history to receive that perk.

In order to qualify for a no-trade clause, a player must meet the following criteria:

He must be signing a free agent contract, not an extension.
He must have at least eight seasons of NBA experience.
He must have spent at least four seasons with the team he’s signing with.

This last point is the most malleable of the three. In order to qualify for a no-trade clause, a player doesn’t necessary need to have spent the past four consecutive seasons with his team — he just needs to have spent at least four seasons with that team at some point.

For example, if LeBron James were to become a free agent next summer and decided to sign with the Heat, he could negotiate a no-trade clause into his new contract, since he spent four years in Miami from 2010-14.

Additionally, a partial season can be counted as one of those four seasons a player needs to spend with a team in order to qualify for a no-trade clause. For instance, if Jordan Clarkson had become a free agent this offseason, he would’ve been eligible to negotiate a no-trade clause with the Jazz, who traded for him during the 2019/20 season. Clarkson has only been in Utah for three full years and part of a fourth season, but that’s enough to meet the criteria.

Still, those three requirements are enough to eliminate a no-trade clause as an option for many players. One prominent recent example is Jaylen Brown. Although Brown has spent more than four years with the Celtics, he has only been in the NBA for seven seasons and is signing an extension rather than a free agent contract, so a no-trade clause wasn’t available to him.

A player who has a no-trade clause in his contract and consents to a trade retains the right to veto a trade when he joins his new team. So Beal’s no-trade clause remains in effect now that he’s a member of the Suns.

Although explicit no-trade clauses are rare, there are a couple other scenarios in which a player can receive an implicit no-trade clause, meaning his consent is still required in order to trade him.

First, a player who re-signs with his previous team on a one-year contract, or a two-year deal with an option year, is given no-trade protection for the rest of that league year — or until his second-year option is exercised.

Heat forward Kevin Love and Suns wing Josh Okogie are among the players who will fall into this group in 2023/24.

Here are a few more notes related to these criteria:

A player who meets these criteria and still decides to consent to a trade will lose his Bird or Early Bird rights at the end of the season and will instead be deemed to have Non-Bird rights.
Although those criteria don’t apply to players on two-way contracts, they do apply to players who accept standard (ie. non two-way) one-year qualifying offers as restricted free agents. So Hornets forward Miles Bridges will have the right to veto a trade in ’23/24.
The NBA’s new Collective Bargaining Agreement allows a player who re-signs with his former team on a one-year contract (or two-year deal with an option) to waive his ability to veto a trade. A handful of players have done so this offseason, including Lakers guard D’Angelo Russell and Nuggets guard Reggie Jackson. They’re eligible to be traded without their approval in 2023/24.

Second, a player who signs an offer sheet as a restricted free agent and has that offer matched by his previous team has the ability to veto a trade for a full calendar year. That means Trail Blazers swingman Matisse Thybulle and Sixers big man Paul Reed will have de facto no-trade protection until next July.

While explicit no-trade clauses in the NBA are rare, these criteria that give players veto rights for a year at a time aren’t uncommon at all, and often end up applying to non-stars, giving them a little control over their own professional futures.

NBA Teams Facing Potential Fall Roster Crunches

July 26th, 2023 at 8:02am CST by Luke Adams

With two months to go until NBA teams report to training camps, there’s no need for a club to have its 21-man offseason roster – let alone its 15-man standard roster for the regular season – set in stone at this point.

Still, many rosters around the league are clearly taking shape, with several teams carrying 14 or 15 players on standard guaranteed contracts and seemingly unlikely to make any more major changes this offseason.

There are also a handful of teams carrying more than 15 standard contracts who will have to trade or waive at least one or two of those players before the regular season begins in order to adhere to the NBA’s regular season roster limit.

Here are some of the teams who will be facing possible roster crunches in the coming months:

Oklahoma City Thunder

(20 standard contracts)

The Thunder have been a willing trade partner for teams looking to dump unwanted contracts this offseason, and it has resulted in Oklahoma City becoming the first club to reach its full 21-man roster limit (its 21st player, Keyontae Johnson, is on a two-way contract).

Of the Thunder’s 20 players on standard deals, at least 17 have guaranteed salaries for 2023/24. That group doesn’t include Jack White, whose full contract details have yet to be reported, or Isaiah Joe and Aaron Wiggins, both of whom are on non-guaranteed contracts after playing well in rotation roles in ’22/23.

If the Thunder intend to keep White, Joe, and Wiggins into the regular season, they’ll have to trade or waive five players on guaranteed salaries. The players recently acquired in those salary-dump deals – including Victor Oladipo, Davis Bertans, TyTy Washington, and Usman Garuba – would probably be most at risk. Of the Thunder’s returning players, Tre Mann and Jeremiah Robinson-Earl are among those whose roster spots may not be fully secure.

Memphis Grizzlies

(17 standard contracts)

Like the Thunder, the Grizzlies took on some unwanted contracts in offseason trades in order to acquire other assets.

The two players Memphis received in those deals – Josh Christopher and Isaiah Todd – are the most likely odd men out for the 15-man regular season roster, since none of Memphis’ other 15 players are obvious trade or release candidates.

San Antonio Spurs

(17 standard contracts)

The Spurs actually only have 16 players on standard contracts for the time being, but are reportedly bringing back Sandro Mamukelashvili on a one-year deal. He has yet to officially re-sign and the exact details of his contract are unclear.

Assuming San Antonio plans to have Mamukelashvili on its 15-man regular season roster, the team will need to trade or waive two other players before opening night. That number could grow if the Spurs want to sign Dominick Barlow or Sidy Cissoko to a standard contract, but they do have two-way slots available for both.

Cameron Payne, Cedi Osman, Reggie Bullock, Devonte’ Graham, and Khem Birch are a few of the veterans on expiring or pseusdo-expiring contracts who probably aren’t in the Spurs’ long-term plans. But some of those guys would be useful contributors on the court this season and might have a little trade value, so San Antonio might not be done dealing.

Washington Wizards

(16 standard contracts)

The Wizards have a new front office in place for this season, so some of the reserves on expiring contracts who were brought in by the old regime could be candidates to be traded or waived. That group includes Delon Wright, whose name has come up in trade rumors this summer, Xavier Cooks, whose multiyear deal is only guaranteed for 2023/24, and Anthony Gill.

The new regime has also acquired a few players this offseason who may have been traded for financial or salary-matching reasons more than for how they fit into the Wizards’ plans going forward. Of those players, Danilo Gallinari and Mike Muscala are on expiring contracts, while Patrick Baldwin and Landry Shamet aren’t currently owed guaranteed money beyond 2023/24 (Ryan Rollins has a $600K partial guarantee in ’24/25).

It wouldn’t shock me if the Wizards end up moving off multiple players on the current roster and making another addition or two before the regular season begins.

Others to watch

The Hawks are currently carrying 16 players on standard contracts, but only 15 are guaranteed, making Vit Krejci and his non-guaranteed salary the probable odd man out. Atlanta also reportedly remains active in trade talks, which could further shake up the roster.

The Hornets only have 12 players on guaranteed salaries, but they also have a pair (JT Thor and Kobi Simmons) on non-guaranteed deals, plus a pair of restricted free agents (P.J. Washington and Theo Maledon) and a No. 31 overall pick (James Nnaji) who remain unsigned. Charlotte can comfortably manage the 15-man limit, especially if Nnaji spends the season overseas, but may have to deal with a minor roster crunch if Washington and Maledon both return.

The Clippers, like the Hawks, have 15 players on guaranteed salaries and a 16th (Jason Preston) on a non-guaranteed deal. Los Angeles pushed back Preston’s guarantee date, which suggests the team may be open to hanging onto him if a roster spot becomes available (perhaps in multi-player James Harden trade?).

The Trail Blazers and Sixers are worth monitoring, since they would likely take back more players than they send out in any trade involving Damian Lillard or Harden. For now though, both teams have plenty of roster space — Portland has 13 players on standard contracts (12 fully guaranteed), while Philadelphia has 14 (13 fully guaranteed).

Load More Posts