Weekly Mailbag

Hoops Rumors Weekly Mailbag 1/3/16-1/10/16

In addition to our weekly chat, which Chuck Myron facilitates every Wednesday, we have a second opportunity for you to hit us up with your questions in this, our weekly mailbag feature. Have a question regarding player movement, the salary cap, or the NBA draft? Drop us a line at HoopsRumorsMailbag@Gmail.com. Here are this week’s inquiries:

What do you make of the Bucks right now? They’re clearly a lottery team, but seemingly with a lot of individual talent. What’s your sense for how they’ll approach the trade deadline? — Daren

HR: The Bucks are one of the most interesting teams in the league. Note: That’s not necessarily a good thing. The team is built to compete now, but Milwaukee is 15-23. Before getting into the trade deadline, it’s worth pointing out that the Bucks have reportedly met twice with free agent Carlos Boozer. The Bucks are without much roster flexibility, since they have 15 fully guaranteed contracts, though they have a $1.664MM sliver of the mid-level exception left over if Boozer, a 13-year veteran, demands more than the minimum salary, which for him would be $1,499,187, as our own Chuck Myron pointed out. With or without Boozer, the Bucks would still have issues. As you pointed out, they have individual talent, but rank as a poor defensive team that needs to score more. Meeting with Boozer signals that the Bucks will likely not be sellers at the deadline. After signing Greg Monroe to a lucrative deal over the summer, I’d look for them to make a minor deal or two with an eye toward next season.

Would the Mavs consider going after Joakim Noah from the Bulls or go get combo guards like Ricky Rubio and Kevin Martin from the Wolves. Which is most likely to happen? — Daniel

HR: Actually, I think the position to keep an eye on regarding the Mavs heading into the trade deadline frenzy is small forward. Chandler Parsons is still rounding into form and there is not much, if any, depth behind him at the position. I could see the Mavs landing Noah because Mark Cuban has reeled in veterans as complementary pieces in the past and it usually has worked. Noah would add some defense and depth in the middle. With four point guards on the roster, I’d be surprised if the Mavs didn’t move at least one of them, even if that is Deron Williams.

Hoops Rumors Weekly Mailbag 12/27/15-1/3/16

In addition to our weekly chat, which Chuck Myron facilitates every Wednesday, we have a second opportunity for you to hit us up with your questions in this, our weekly mailbag feature. Have a question regarding player movement, the salary cap, or the NBA draft? Drop us a line at HoopsRumorsMailbag@Gmail.com. Here are this week’s inquiries:

Are the Cavs looking to make a trade this season to enhance their championship run? — Thea

HR: Barring an injury, I really don’t think acquiring more new players would help the Cavs. In fact, I think that would be counter-productive. For the first time all season, the Cavs are actually healthy. With a roster already dotted with talent, the depth chart will likely soon be in a state of flux with coach David Blatt mixing and matching until he finds something that he thinks works. We haven’t heard or read from anywhere else that the Cavs are intent on making a move. What’s more, now at full strength, there really is not an area of weakness that needs to be addressed. Making a trade at this point would delay what’s most important for the Cavs heading into what projects to be a deep playoff run: time to gel.

Since it seems the Bucks will stay put and they looked to be the most likely to relocate, who are the logical candidates now or is it as simple as the league just stalling until they decide to expand? — Joe

HR: This is just my speculation (based on conversations from reporters and lower-level executives in the league last season), but I think there is a stronger chance of the league expanding than there is of a team relocating, like you hint at. I think you’re right about the Bucks. They seemed to be on thin ice for a while, but it looks like they’ve sorted things out. To digress momentarily, I would not have been surprised to see the Pelicans relocate had it not been for Anthony Davis. To get back to your question: Commissioner Adam Silver said in April that relocation or expansion is unlikely for at least the next two years. Again, this is solely my opinion, but one would have to think that Seattle would be in line as a city that can generate the revenue needed once the league does decide to expand again.

Why won’t the Knicks just add Jimmer Fredette? — Allie

HR: Well, you can’t really blame any team for not jumping to add Fredette based on the minimal success he has experienced so far in the league. Sorry; I know he is a fan favorite for many. For whatever the reason, though, his game has not translated well to the NBA. Fredette is currently playing for the Knicks’ D-League affiliate in Westchester. But if you’re a Knicks fan, shouldn’t you be wanting more? They’ve checked in on Brandon Jennings, according to Ian Begley of ESPN.com and are reportedly interested in Tony Wroten. Both would be better options for a team with backcourt issues.

Hoops Rumors Weekly Mailbag 12/20/15-12/27/15

In addition to our weekly chat, which Chuck Myron facilitates every Wednesday, we have a second opportunity for you to hit us up with your questions in this, our weekly mailbag feature. Have a question regarding player movement, the salary cap, or the NBA draft? Drop us a line at HoopsRumorsMailbag@Gmail.com. Here are this week’s inquiries:

Is Danny Granger giving up on getting back to sufficient health and likely to be announcing his retirement, or, instead, is he biding his time, intending to be a mid-season or late-season spark plug for some contender with an open roster slot? — Stewart

HR: It’s been a while since we’ve heard Granger’s name floated around. The Pistons waived Granger in late October and he hasn’t been relevant since. It sounds obvious, but only Granger knows for sure how healthy he is, and that will likely dictate whether he still has anything left to give. In my opinion, it would be surprising on multiple fronts to see Granger back on the court. One reason is that he was dealing with plantar fasciitis before Detroit cut him. As many of us know, that is a nagging injury that oftentimes does not go away. Granger also has a history of knee problems. At 32, there is really no reason for a team to offer him a spot. Granger has not had a productive season since the 2011/12 campaign, which was the last time he appeared in more than 30 games over the course of a single season.

What are some possible moves or signings for the Mavs? — Rob

HR: Well, for better or worse, Mavericks owner Mark Cuban recently said he likes the current roster. Cuban also added that the media and public are never really in the know when Dallas is about to make a move, so take that for what it’s worth. Prior to that, Mavs coach Rick Carlisle made comments about making changes to the roster only to backtrack from them afterward. Recent history tells us that the Mavs are not exactly timid when it comes to making deals involving big names. If he can be obtained without giving up much, I’d speculate that the Mavs could trade for Joakim Noah. Dallas will likely give up less, given Zaza Pachulia‘s production. Our own Chuck Myron recently viewed Noah as a trade candidate. Speaking of the Bulls, Taj Gibson looked like a good fit for the Mavs prior to the season. I strongly believe the Mavs will pick up some bench options, but with the team enjoying a solid season so far with a bunch of new parts, I wouldn’t expect significant changes to alter chemistry even more.

Which potential trade candidate do you think is the most underrated? — John

HR: David Lee strikes me as the perfect player as an answer to this question. The Celtics are making Lee available to teams that would like to trade for him, according to TNT’s David Aldridge. As someone who grew up a Knicks fan, I still have fond memories of Lee. At 32, Lee’s best years are behind him, but as his statistics per 36 minutes (16.9 points) indicate, he still more than a serviceable option. Lee, who is on an expiring contract, is an underrated player right now because he is seeing the fewest minutes per game of his career. That has more to do with the success of  Jared Sullinger, Amir Johnson and Kelly Olynyk than any shortcomings Lee might have, in my opinion.

Hoops Rumors Weekly Mailbag 12/13/15-12/20/15

In addition to our weekly chat, which Chuck Myron facilitates every Wednesday, we have a second opportunity for you to hit us up with your questions in this, our weekly mailbag feature. Have a question regarding player movement, the salary cap, or the NBA draft? Drop us a line at HoopsRumorsMailbag@Gmail.com. Here are this week’s inquiries:

“ESPN has mentioned Joe Harris is being shopped. What say you folks?” — Eric

HR: Actually, it was Jason Lloyd of the Akron Beacon Journal who wrote that the Cavs would like to obtain a second-round pick in exchange for Harris. As a result, Harris has been showcased in the D-League this month, moving up and down a handful of times. The Cavs are looking to move Harris because of the surprising play of Jared Cunningham and the team’s looming luxury tax bill, according to Lloyd. Harris has not played much in the league since being drafted in 2014 and, while this is just my speculation, it seems likely the Cavs will shed his fully guaranteed $845,059 salary as soon as possible since he is now looking more expendable than ever.

Do you think the Lakers will consider trading players such as Roy Hibbert and Lou Williams for picks? What kind of value do you think they hold? — Aaron

HR: Hibbert, in my opinion, has a better chance of being dealt because he is set to be a free agent after the season. Williams, on the other hand, signed a three-year, $21MM deal with the Lakers in the summer after he scored 15.5 points per game on 40.4% shooting last season in Toronto. I really think that the Lakers are committed to Williams, who could help lure more talent into the fold next season. Hibbert has helped the Lakers has a veteran mentor on a young team. While he is not the player he was a couple of years ago, Hibbert has re-established himself as a serviceable starting option in the league and there is a decent chance he could help the Lakers land a future second-round pick of sorts, in my estimation.

Can the Lakers get a first-round pick from a team for Hibbert? — Aaron

HR: I highly doubt it. Hibbert just turned 29, has experienced down seasons already and is likely past his prime. I credit him for having a decent comeback season now, but it’s just not enough to warrant exchanging a first-round pick for. That is unless, perhaps, he is part of a larger package, of course.

Do you think DeMar DeRozan and Hassan Whiteside are realistic options for the Lakers? — Isaac
HR: Not really, but maybe. I know that is an ambiguous answer, but until the Lakers show they should be taken seriously, it will have to do. DeRozan, who is eligible to opt out of his current deal with the Raptors and become an unrestricted free agent next summer, grew up in California and played college ball at USC so there might be an attraction there. Plus, he might want to play with former Raptors teammate Lou Williams. Whiteside, who is set to be a free agent this summer, seems more like a wild dream because I would imagine the Heat will do everything possible to re-sign him.

Hoops Rumors Weekly Mailbag 12/6/15-12/13/15

In addition to our weekly chat, which Chuck Myron facilitates every Wednesday, we have a second opportunity for you to hit us up with your questions in this, our weekly mailbag feature. Have a question regarding player movement, the salary cap, or the NBA draft? Drop us a line at HoopsRumorsMailbag@Gmail.com. Here are this week’s inquiries:

“With the Washington Wizards’ expectations this year and their lack of success do you see them making a trade? Would they ever trade Bradley Beal seeing as how he did not sign an extension and he would be able to fetch a lot on the trade market? Would the Nuggets be a possibility? Denver has young assets and draft picks.” — Domanic

HR: It’s been a disappointing start to the season for the Wizards, but they are near .500 and still very much in striking distance of a playoff spot. With their talent, it is conceivable for them to hold on to their assets and still make a run. As for Beal, he has had an interesting record when it comes to health. J. Michael of CSNMidAtlantic.com recently referred to it as “long and complex.” The Wizards made it clear in the past that they envisioned inking him to a new deal even though they could not come to an agreement on an extension. Despite that now seemingly up in the air because Beal will be out a few games with an injury, I don’t see him getting traded. His injury, however, is something I really think will decrease his value this summer because, as we know, this is not the first occurrence of Beal missing action.

Can you see the Knicks signing Joakim Noah through free agency in the offseason? What are some other realistic possible signings for New York this summer? — Rodney

HR: The short answer: No, I really can’t. I mean, Noah may be had a discount because of the down season he is experiencing coming off the bench for the Bulls, but there is not much to suggest he would be in for a bounce-back campaign. I do not think adding an aging star would help the Knicks. New York will obviously target Kevin Durant this summer, but it would behoove the Knicks to make a run at Brandon Jennings, a point guard coming off injury troubles who might outplay is next contract. Ryan Anderson and Al Horford are two other well-known names that come to mind.

What are the chances the Lakers have now in gaining a star powered free agent, now that Kobe Bryant announced his retirement? — Leroy

HR: Contrary to the popular belief, I don’t think Kobe Bryant mattered much in whether or not the Lakers’ chances were strong next summer for landing a star free agent. They are likely a couple of seasons away from being relevant to the playoff picture, which is not very attractive for many free agents. The lure of L.A. is not what it once was. The Lakers will have the money to offer, but I just don’t see how the team can attract the stars of the upcoming free agent class.

I’m reading that several teams are interested in Shabazz Muhammad? Do you see the Timberwolves pulling the trigger on a trade even after reports are saying they don’t intend on trading him? Secondly if they do decide to trade him, where would he go? — I’llBeDat44
HR: Like you said, there are several teams interested in acquiring Muhammad. The Nets, Lakers and Clippers have been identified as just a few. Muhammad is in year three of his rookie scale deal and eligible for an extension in the offseason. Muhammad, 23, is a talented young player and could very well be a piece the Clippers need to turn things around. Yet what attracts so many teams to Muhammad is the very reason why the Wolves say they won’t deal him. I believe them, too. The Wolves are building a young team with a few potential stars. Minnesota needs Muhammad more than anything it would receive in return for him.

Hoops Rumors Weekly Mailbag 11/29/15-12/5/15

In addition to our weekly chat, which Chuck Myron facilitates every Wednesday, we have a second opportunity for you to hit us up with your questions in this, our weekly mailbag feature. Have a question regarding player movement, the salary cap, or the NBA draft? Drop me a line at HoopsRumorsMailbag@Gmail.com or @EddieScarito on Twitter. This week, in a continued effort to change things up a bit, I’ve once again invited some of the other staff members to join in on the fun. Now for this week’s inquiries:

Any news on the Cavs $12 million trade exception? I heard they’re looking for a backup SG/SF or PF, a couple rumored names have been Markieff Morris and Rudy Gay, any chance those are true and will Ray Allen return?” — Dan

Chuck Myron: I haven’t come across anything about that exception in a while, and with the Cavs sitting atop the Eastern Conference, I don’t think they’re in any hurry to use it. Also, I should point out, the exception is only worth $10,522,500. They have another worth $2,854,940, and while they’re free to use them both, they can’t combine them to acquire a $12MM or $13MM player. The Cavs are in line to pay more than $170MM in payroll and taxes, the second highest total of all-time. They could break the record if they used their exceptions. I think they’d be willing to do that if they became convinced they can’t win the title, but if you have a team that’s good enough to win as it is, why pay an extra $70MM or so, which is what it could run, just to trade for a couple of backups? It doesn’t make sense. You could argue that the Warriors are just that much better than anybody, but the Cavs, of all people, should know what injuries in the playoffs can do to a team. The exceptions don’t expire until the end of July 2016, and it makes a lot more sense for the Cavs to use them then, when the tax threshold will be much higher, thanks to the rising salary cap. And, I wouldn’t count on Ray Allen returning. If he does, I’m not sure what he could really give anybody, having been away from the game for so long.
“What sort of market do you see for Harrison Barnes this offseason? If he doesn’t return to Golden State, then what teams look like realistic fits?” — Kurt
Will Sammon: It’s interesting that Warriors players have recently been so outspoken about “helping” Barnes on the court because he is set to be a restricted free agent. The market suggests he will receive an offer between $15-20MM per year. I really think Golden State will match it, especially if they do not land a different big-name free agent. The only way I see Barnes playing elsewhere is if he is involved in a sign-and-trade with the Thunder. I think that is a long shot, too.
With Rajon Rondo playing so well is there any chance the Kings trade Darren Collison? What team(s) could be potential trading partners?” — Silvio
Charlie Adams: There’s no doubt that Rondo has been playing well, but it’s tough to move Collison when Sacramento is so thin at the point. It sure doesn’t look like the team is going to contend this year, but moving one of the best reserve floor generals in the league for a likely less-than-stellar return just doesn’t seem like a move Vlade Divac would make, given the Kings’ resistance to traditional rebuilding. Of course, it’s tough to predict the Sacramento’s next move, and there would almost certainly be a number of teams interested in taking on Collison, who has a team-friendly deal, but for now it seems like he’s staying put in the purple-and-black.

Will the league ever get around to doing anything to discourage teams like the Sixers from tanking and putting D-League teams on the court for NBA games?” — Chris

Eddie Scarito: That’s a tough one to predict. Adam Silver’s proposal to even the lottery odds was voted down by the owners,  so it would appear that there isn’t much impetus to actually enact a change at this time. The fact that tanking hasn’t proven to be an effective means to win a title, or in Philly’s case, to put a respectable product on the floor nightly, doesn’t help the cause of those who desire some sort of reform. I think the issue will come up during the next collective bargaining negotiations, though even then I don’t think much will change. But I do see there being a conflict regarding the salary floor for teams. With the cap set to jump, the negotiations could get contentious regarding certain issues, and I think the NBPA will place an emphasis on upping the minimum payroll that teams are required to have. With the cap potentially jumping to $95MM next season, an adjustment will certainly be in order, though how much of a bump will occur will be a hot button issue I believe.
One solution I can throw out there regarding the salary floor is to change the date when payroll numbers are calculated. Zach Lowe of ESPN.com mentioned this idea in a story Friday. Currently the league looks at a franchise’s payroll at the end of the season, which gives teams like the Sixers far more leeway to tank for the bulk of the campaign before potentially taking on a number of expiring contracts just to get themselves above that minimum, or at least somewhere close to it. I say it would be a wise move to change the cutoff date to coincide with the February trade deadline. Setting it prior to that date could potentially impact the robustness of the trade market, which no one wants to have happen. Lining up the two dates would not only force teams to buff up their payroll earlier in the season, which would please the NBPA, it could also serve to make the final hours leading up to the deadline even more dramatic since teams would be scrambling to comply with the rules. I’d also impose harsher penalties on offending teams. Perhaps the loss of a second round pick would be sufficient motivation to beef up payrolls.
“Which players will be on the move as Dec 15 rapidly approaching?” — Solomon
Will Sammon: December 15th is the first day that most of the players who signed new contracts over the summer can be traded. It’s when the unofficial trade season begins. O.J. Mayo, who is making $8MM in the final year of his contract, is a name to keep an eye on if the Bucks continue to surprisingly plummet further in the Eastern Conference. The same could be said about Jerryd Bayless. Both could be rental-type veteran pieces for contending teams. Brandon Bass signed a two-year deal with the Lakers in July, but since the Lakers are already out of the playoff picture (plus Kobe Bryant announced he will retire after the season), it would make sense to cut ties with the veteran and ship him for a younger player. Sooner or later, the expectation is that the Clippers will make a splashy move.

Hoops Rumors Weekly Mailbag 11/15/15-11/21/15

In addition to our weekly chat, which Chuck Myron facilitates every Wednesday, we have a second opportunity for you to hit us up with your questions in this, our weekly mailbag feature. Have a question regarding player movement, the salary cap, or the NBA draft? Drop me a line at HoopsRumorsMailbag@Gmail.com or @EddieScarito on Twitter. This week, in a continued effort to change things up a bit, I’ve once again invited some of the other staff members to join in on the fun. Now for this week’s inquiries:

Which player’s deal this year is looking the best value for his team? Why?” — Silas

Chuck Myron: Bargains always emerge. You could say Sixers point guard T.J. McConnell, making the rookie minimum and among the league leaders in assists, is the best value, and you could say much the same about Ish Smith, who’s only costing the Pelicans the two-year veteran’s minimum. Plenty of others make a lot more but are still well worth the money. If you’re just talking about guys who signed this summer, I’d nominate Brandon Knight, who took more than $24MM less than the max on his five-year, $70MM deal with the Suns and is playing lights-out ball so far this season. If you’re talking about guys on existing deals, Hassan Whiteside is the clear choice in the minimum-salary category. Stephen Curry‘s $11.37MM salary is nowhere close to the minimum, but it’s also nowhere close to his market value.

How much stock do you place in the rumors that Dion Waiters wants to play for the Sixers?” — Damon

Eddie Scarito: I think there is definitely some legitimacy to the chatter, though Waiters did take to his Twitter account to deny the rumors. But I think that’s just a case of him being diplomatic and not rankling the folks signing his paychecks. Waiters didn’t get a contract extension prior to this season’s deadline, so there is the possibility that he feels a bit slighted by OKC, and the team may also not be sure about Waiters’ long-term future with the franchise as well. That leaves the door open for many different scenarios.

I’d be shocked if Philly offered Waiters a boatload of cash and he declined it. There are quite a few players in the league who grew up dreaming of playing for their hometown squads, and Waiters is likely no different. Plus, with the Sixers bereft of talent, the numbers he would have the opportunity to put up in Philly would certainly be a draw for him. He’d also be one of the team’s focal points, a role he hasn’t had the opportunity to have with either Cleveland or Oklahoma City. So to answer your question…yes, I do think that there is an excellent chance Waiters could be a Sixer at some point…voluntarily. An important distinction to make given the team’s penchant for taking on bad contracts in exchange for draft picks.

What is the current trade market for Ricky Rubio? Is Minnesota better with him or without him in the long run?” — Zeve

Charlie Adams: I have a hard time believing there’s a team interested in giving up any valuable assets in exchange for a point guard who has yet to prove he can stay healthy for an extended period of time. I think the Wolves would be foolish to sell low on someone with the potential that Ricky has, and their decision to sign him to $55MM extension speaks to their commitment of keeping him long term. The numbers speak for themselves; Minnesota is a much better team on both sides of the ball when Rubio is on the floor, so I think it’s fair to say the greatest value he provides the team is as their starting point guard and not as a trade chip. He has the ability to facilitate for the young pieces Minnesota has, and he can contribute without taking 20 shots from the floor each night. If he can stay healthy, he’s the ideal fit for a young team with the sort of potential that the Wolves have.

With the way Mario Chalmers is lighting it up in New Orleans, how big of a contract is he setting himself up for this summer? Where do you think he may end up playing next season?” — Kyle

Chris Crouse: Chalmers looks like he found himself a good fit and he could very well return to the Grizzlies next season. If he continues playing this way, he’ll certainly see a raise on his current $4.3MM salary. Memphis will probably want him back, as starter Mike Conley will be a free agent and Chalmers would serve as a decent plan B. As far as his next contract, I can envision him getting a deal in the four-year, $40MM territory, but that’s on the high end of the scale.

What has gone wrong with the Rockets this season? Were they simply overrated? Or is it something deeper? The curse of Ty Lawson perhaps?” — Chris

Will Sammon: We hear this a lot — so much so that it sounds annoying — but it’s fitting at this time of the year: It’s a long season. There’s a lot of talent in Houston so there’s reason to think the Rockets can turn it around despite defensive woes. That said, acquiring Ty Lawson was a questionable move. It was an interesting gamble that looks like it has backfired. It’s unlikely that it will cost them, though.

That’s going to do it for this week’s edition. Thanks to all those who sent in their inquiries. We’ll see you back here next Saturday with more responses.

Hoops Rumors Weekly Mailbag 11/8/15-11/14/15

In addition to our weekly chat, which Chuck Myron facilitates every Wednesday, we have a second opportunity for you to hit us up with your questions in this, our weekly mailbag feature. Have a question regarding player movement, the salary cap, or the NBA draft? Drop me a line at HoopsRumorsMailbag@Gmail.com or @EddieScarito on Twitter. This week, in a continued effort to change things up a bit, I’ve once again invited some of the other staff members to join in on the fun. Now for this week’s inquiries:

How much will the Heat miss Mario Chalmers, especially if Gerald Green were to miss more time this season? Do you really thing Tyler Johnson is the answer at backup point guard?” — Vinnie

Chris Crouse: The Heat will miss Chalmers. He was playing pretty well this season and with his departure, the door has opened for Tyler Johnson to receive more touches. However, the team seems to be going with Beno Udrih as the backup point guard. That role doesn’t come with the burden of a traditional point guard because of how coach Erik Spoelstra staggers the minutes of Goran Dragic and Dwyane Wade and how much they both handle the rock. Both players should dominate the ball even more as a result of this trade. It’ll really hurt the Heat in games that Wade doesn’t play. Those should be the games where we see Johnson running the offense and probably taking too many shots for a player of his caliber.

Now that this season’s extension deadline has passed, which player who didn’t agree to an extension will make his team regret it the most? Why?” — Sam

Will Sammon: A handful of guys, notably Andre Drummond and Bradley Beal, are expected to ink deals with their current clubs after not agreeing to an extension. By the end of the season, Evan Fournier could very well make the Magic regret not being able to extend him before the deadline. Fournier is an excellent perimeter defender and is now consistently attacking the rim on offense. He’s an important player right now for the Magic and it will be interesting how Orlando’s offseason shapes up if Fournier ends up not returning.

Give me your three most under-the-radar free agents for next summer who will make the GMs who sign them look like geniuses. I’ll hold you to these by the way….” — Isaac

Chuck Myron: No pressure, huh? Well, a lot depends on how much you sign a guy for. The genius signing for $5MM is the foolish signing for $15MM. Anyway, Courtney Lee, though he’s off to a slow start this year, has always fit in well for the right team at the right price, so if someone can get him for the mid-level exception next summer, that’ll be a bargain. Alan Anderson, who seems to have exceeded expectations wherever he’s gone, could be available on the cheap if he doesn’t bounce back quickly from his injury. Miles Plumlee, who started for the 48-win Suns team that barely missed the playoffs in 2013/14, is buried on the bench in Milwaukee and is set for restricted free agency. I think he’ll succeed if given minutes somewhere.

Which rookie(s) have impressed you the most so far this season?” — Billy

Eddie Scarito: I’ve been pleasantly surprised by a number of this year’s crop of rookies, and I’m beginning to believe that the 2015 draft may end up being looked back upon as one of the deeper ones in recent years. I’m glad you allowed me to choose more than one player, since there are a few who have caught my eye. Here are some rookies who I think have stood out from the rest of the pack thus far:

  1. Karl-Anthony Towns: Sure, he’s the No. 1 overall pick, and that honor always comes with a set of lofty expectations based on talent level. But after playing just one season at Kentucky, and playing limited minutes while there thanks to the team’s depth, Towns is looking like the real deal for Minnesota. When I say real deal, I mean he appears to have the capability of being a top five player in the league in just a few seasons.
  2. Rondae Hollis-Jefferson: Brooklyn did rather well for itself on draft night by nabbing Hollis-Jefferson. Sure, he’s still as raw as freshly butchered steak, but there is no denying that the Nets are a better, more exciting team when he’s on the court. Defensively, he’s already a stud, and Hollis-Jefferson is a highlight reel waiting to happen when running the break. If he can ever develop a passable jump shot, GM Billy King should be lauded for maximizing the No. 23 overall pick he acquired from Portland in exchange for Mason Plumlee.
  3. Myles Turner: Turner is another would-be project who has surpassed initial expectations and snagged himself a rotation slot early in his rookie campaign. His fractured left thumb will keep him out of action for roughly a month, which is unfortunate. But the Pacers have to be happy with what the big man has shown them thus far. He looks like he has the makings of a solid stretch-four, and if he can improve his defense, the franchise landed itself a starting-caliber player in this year’s draft.
  4. Kristaps Porzingis: Porzingis’ selection was met with quite a bit of skepticism (myself included), but he’s making Phil Jackson look very wise for snagging him at No. 4 overall. I have been very impressed with his rebounding and defense thus far, and the Latvian has shown flashes of greatness on the offensive end at times. After Towns, Porzingis could end up being the second best player in the entire draft. The Knicks finally catch a break and land a player the franchise can build around. What a world.
  5. T.J. McConnell: McConnell is the only undrafted player on this list, but he’s held his own thus far, and is averaging a stellar 7.7 assists per game for the Sixers. I’m not sure that he can sustain his production over the course of a full season (probably not), and his playing time will likely take a hit once Tony Wroten and Kendall Marshall return to the lineup. But for now, he’s a great early season storyline, and for Sixers fans struggling to cope with yet another awful start, he’s one of the few reasons to cheer on a nightly basis.
With the Warriors not missing a beat in his absence, should we look at Steve Kerr’s rookie season differently?” — Kurt
Charlie Adams: I don’t think it’s fair to take away from Steve Kerr‘s rookie campaign as a coach just because the Warriors have gotten off to such a hot start this season. The biggest reason that Golden State found success last year was the team’s core group of players, which has remained intact. Luke Walton has done a fantastic job making sure the team is maintaining Kerr’s fast-paced, floor-spacing philosophy, and as long as the team is healthy, the Warriors have as good a shot as anybody to win the title this year.

Well, that’s all the space we have for this week. Thanks again to all those who sent in their inquiries. Keep them coming, and we’ll be back next Saturday with more responses.

Hoops Rumors Weekly Mailbag 11/1/15-11/7/15

In addition to our weekly chat, which Chuck Myron facilitates every Wednesday, we have a second opportunity for you to hit us up with your questions in this, our weekly mailbag feature. Have a question regarding player movement, the salary cap, or the NBA draft? Drop me a line at HoopsRumorsMailbag@Gmail.com or @EddieScarito on Twitter. This week, in a continued effort to change things up a bit, I’ve once again invited some of the other staff members to join in on the fun. Now for this week’s inquiries:

Who will be starting point guard for the Sixers by the end of this season? Is the team more likely to fill the spot long-term via the draft, trade, or free agency?” — Billy

Will Sammon: T.J. McConnell — a point guard who went undrafted, by the way — is making it really hard to remove him from the starting role once Kendall Marshall and Tony Wroten are healthy. Would I bet he’s the long-term answer for the Sixers? Probably not. Then again, though, I wouldn’t bet on anything when it comes to the Sixers. GM Sam Hinkie hasn’t done anything to make a free agent want to come to the Sixers. The team will likely have another lottery pick next year and it would make sense to draft a viable point guard.

Do you see Indiana trading Solomon Hill before the trade deadline? If so, what team might you see that can use him?” — Tyler

Chuck Myron: It’s certainly not uncommon for players in his position to end up in trades, with Austin Rivers a recent example. Any team that turns down a rookie scale option has usually lost faith that the player will become productive on the NBA level, and that’s particularly true when you’re talking about someone who was taken near the end of the draft like Hill was. His option was only worth $2,306,019, a pittance compared to most NBA salaries and only about $1MM more than his minimum salary. The Pacers can’t re-sign him for more than that, and that also applies to any team that trades for him. Ostensibly, that would dampen his trade value, since any team that trades for him runs the risk of getting outbid. But realistically, the chances of that aren’t so great. Unless he goes some place and lights it up in the back half of this season, it shouldn’t take more than $2.3MM to re-sign him. So, with the Pacers more or less having moved on, I can certainly envision Indiana dealing him away, perhaps to the Grizzlies, since Hill’s a decent outside shooter and relatively young, two qualities Memphis lacks. That’s just my speculation, though.

What are the chances the Timberwolves trade Nikola Pekovic this season? Any teams come to mind that would be interested in him?” — Zeke

Chris Crouse: Pekovic is still recovering from an Achilles injury, but when he does return, it’s unlikely he sees heavy minutes for the Wolves due to the presence of Gorgui Dieng and Karl-Anthony Towns. The best move for Minnesota might be to deal him, however, the team is not going to give him away. He’s owed $35.8MM over the next three seasons. Minnesota has no problem committing that much salary to him because most of its core is going to be on rookie contracts. Pekovic’s contract doesn’t match his production right now, yet, it’s not an unmovable deal, especially with the rising salary cap.

As far as suitors go, you’d have to think the Mavs would be interested in acquiring the big man. Half of the Dallas roster can’t be traded until December 15th, but at that point, I wouldn’t be surprised to hear rumblings about a deal. I could also see the Pacers making a move for Pekovic if their small ball plan doesn’t pan out.

What gives with Markieff Morris? First he wants out of Phoenix, then he’s happy to be in training camp, and now he wants out again. Where and when will this end?” — Scott

Eddie Scarito: Honestly, I don’t think all that much has changed from the offseason regarding Morris’ feelings toward still being in Phoenix. Markieff and the Suns’ prospects for a healthy long-term relationship don’t appear to be very good, and the franchise dealing away his brother, Marcus, is something I don’t think he’ll get over anytime soon. I don’t believe Markieff has been flip-flopping on his stance on Phoenix at all. Instead, I think he realized that rocking the boat wasn’t going to work for him, especially if the franchise hoped to find a suitor that would offer an acceptable return for his services. The latest chatter from Marcus is merely a case of him speaking out of turn, as well as trying to support his brother. I don’t fault him for that … but it’s not going to help matters to stir up trouble right now.

The whole situation is getting tiresome, and not just from those of us observing from outside the organization. I’ll bet the Suns’ front office would love to part ways with Markieff, but I’d wager nothing will happen until after December 15th, which is when the majority of the league becomes eligible to be dealt. I would be shocked if Morris was still a member of the Suns by the time the February trade deadline rolls around. But … I will also add that I don’t see Phoenix recouping equal value in any deal, since Morris’ antics over the summer most likely didn’t garner too many fans around the rest of the NBA’s front offices. While Morris is certainly a talented player, he’s not quite at the level that is worth the all the headaches that come with him, especially if he remains unhappy at being separated from Marcus.

What happens if Hassan Whiteside‘s play regresses this season? Could the Heat look to sell him off while he still has high value? If so, what teams could be a fit for Whiteside?” — Larry

Charlie Adams: To be fair, his play hasn’t shown any signs of regressing, and even if he went cold for the next several weeks, almost every team in the league would be interested in acquiring a guy like Whiteside. He’s making less than a million dollars and has All-Star potential, which isn’t typical in the NBA, even for players much younger than him. I’m sure Pat Riley and company have valid concerns about his character and durability, but there’s virtually no chance Whiteside plays for any team other than the Heat this season. There’s a chance he won’t be back in Miami next year, since the Heat don’t have his full Bird Rights, but I think the team will do everything in its power to retain him, even if it means sacrificing a chance at going after a big name free agent from another team. There’s a short list of big men in the league who can fill up a stat sheet the same way Whiteside does.

That’s going to do it for this week’s mailbag. Thanks to all those who sent in their questions. We’ll be back next Saturday with more responses.

Hoops Rumors Weekly Mailbag 10/25/15-10/31/15

In addition to our weekly chat, which Chuck Myron facilitates every Wednesday, we have a second opportunity for you to hit us up with your questions in this, our weekly mailbag feature. Have a question regarding player movement, the salary cap, or the NBA draft? Drop me a line at HoopsRumorsMailbag@Gmail.com or @EddieScarito on Twitter. This week, in a continued effort to change things up a bit, I’ve once again invited some of the other staff members to join in on the fun. Now for this week’s inquiries:

With Harrison Barnes and the Warriors not likely to work out an extension, what kind of cap issues will this cause for the team next offseason?” Is Barnes likely to head elsewhere next summer now?” — Li

Chuck Myron: Theoretically, it gives the Warriors a chance to open some cap room for next season, especially if the cap escalates to $95MM instead of the projected $89MM, as some agents and executives around the league reportedly think it will. Still, it’s a long shot that Golden State would clear that cap room, since it would involve waiving Shaun Livingston and Jason Thompson and renouncing the rights to players like Festus Ezeli, who might just sign an extension before Monday’s deadline and close off the cap room possibility anyway. The more realistic effect of failing to sign Barnes to an extension is that the Warriors will be unable to trade him without his consent next summer if an appetizing deal, such as a sign-and-trade for Kevin Durant, were to materialize, as Tim Kawakami of the Bay Area News Group has written on multiple occasions. Granted, I wouldn’t bet on Durant playing with the Warriors next season regardless of what happened with Barnes, but this makes that possibility slightly more remote.

Ultimately, I think Barnes is likely to remain with Golden State, since the Warriors have the ability to match competing bids for him next summer. The question is just how much Barnes is going to cost. That depends heavily on how he performs this season. If he falls flat and another team offers him the max, or close to it, I think that would be the only scenario in which the Warriors decide against matching an offer sheet for him.
The Raptors look like they’re missing Lou Williams‘ offense already. Will the team take a step back this season despite improving its defense? Is there a trade the team should consider making?” — Jacob
Will Sammon: Hi, Jacob. First, relax. It’s kind of early. Actually, it’s really early. There’s no doubt, the Raptors at times will miss Lou Williams‘ offensive ability, but they’re better off in the long run with the roster they assembled. Think of this way, too: Without Williams, other players — like Jonas Valanciunas — will get more touches and the expectation is for them to make the most of it. Cory Joseph is a guy worth keeping an eye on in terms of the Raptors’ scoring. A trade at this point would scream panic and you don’t want that. Trust in the defense — there’s plenty of it.
Which training camp cut did you find the most surprising, and why?” — Michael
Eddie Scarito: That’s an easy one as far as I’m concerned the Celtics cutting Perry Jones III loose. Jones is still a young player (24 years old), he possessed a fully guaranteed deal ($2,038,206 for 2015/16), and Boston is a young team in need of scorers, which Jones has the ability to become if given the opportunity. I get that Jones was waived mainly because of a numbers crunch in Boston, where Jones owned one of the 16 fully guaranteed salaries the Celtics carried into training camp, but I still think the team would have been better served to see if Jones could have contributed over the course of the season rather than eating his contract. Don’t get me wrong here. It’s not like Boston cut Anthony Davis or another player of that caliber, but I still think Jones has the potential to be a useful rotation player in the league if given some regular minutes off the pine.
Which rookies will be the biggest surprises this season (both good and bad)?” — Carl
Charlie Adams: I think Myles Turner will have a chance to make a real impact with the Pacers this season. Indiana has a surplus of bigs, but none of them have exceptional talent, so it’s possible that Turner could end up seeing some major minutes if he’s able to produce when he’s given time on the court. Of course, at just 19 years old, Turner is still rough around the edges, but it’s a short list of players in this year’s draft who have a higher upside than him. As for a rookie that might produce below expectations, I’m going to say Stanley Johnson. While I think he’ll end up having a solid year, I’ve seen multiple publications list him as their pick to win Rookie of the Year. With the amount of rookie talent in the league, it’s hard for me to see him bringing home that title since he’ll be battling for minutes in Detroit.
How high do you think Hassan Whiteside‘s ceiling is? Do you think he’s worth max contract, and if so, will the Heat offer him that amount?” — Doug
Chris Crouse: I envision him having a solid career, but I don’t believe he becomes the dominant force that we saw flashes of last season. Marcin Gortat or Robin Lopez would be fair comparisons as far as career arcs go. Both have had solid careers and both have been important parts of playoff runs, yet neither are great enough to carry the team. Whiteside is in a good spot in Miami; he doesn’t have to carry the team. If he has a great season, some team may offer him the max, but I don’t believe Miami will consider that kind of deal for him. The Heat are thinking bigger. They want a big fish and they can only hand out one more big contract unless Wade takes a substantial pay cut. I don’t see Wade doing that to allow the team to pay Whiteside. The center could very well be playing in South Beach for years to come, just not on a max contact.
That’s going to put a bow on this week’s mailbag. Thanks to all those who sent in their inquiries. Please keep them coming, and we’ll see you back here next Saturday.