Coming off their third consecutive appearance in the NBA Finals, the Cavaliers are in a very unusual spot. Cleveland went 12-1 against Eastern Conference foes in the playoffs, asserting its dominance in the conference once again, but there’s still a sense that the team has to shake things up and make major moves this offseason in order to be able to truly compete with the Warriors.
For a team led by LeBron James, who has appeared in seven consecutive Finals, anything short of a championship has become a letdown. With LeBron once again just a year from potential free agency, there will be tremendous pressure on the Cavaliers’ front office this summer to make tangible upgrades to a roster that’s already extremely talented — not to mention capped out.
Here are five key questions facing the Cavs this offseason:
The lucrative contracts received by the likes of Tristan Thompson and J.R. Smith in recent years make it easy to joke that LeBron is the general manager in Cleveland. But the Cavs were actually fairly adept at adding talent in creative ways under David Griffin, generating and making use of trade exceptions, and finessing the cap despite being well over the tax line. Griffin and the front office deserve credit for that.
Heading into the 2017 free agent period though, Griffin is no longer making the team’s basketball decisions, having been unable to reach a new deal with owner Dan Gilbert. Senior VP Trent Redden is out as well, leaving assistant GM Koby Altman and perhaps Gilbert himself as the ones reportedly burning up the phone lines in search of a blockbuster trade.
Not every one of Griffin’s decisions as GM was optimal, and the Cavs are in a tough spot with the salary cap heading into 2017/18. But he’s a smart guy who was intimately familiar with the Cavs’ roster and knew what sort of moves were possible. It’s not clear yet if the same can be said for Chauncey Billups, who is reportedly the frontrunner to become the club’s new president of basketball operations.
Billups has no front office experience, and would likely need to be paired with an experienced executive who could step into the GM role. It’s possible that could work in the long-term, but the fact that it remains up in the air at this point in the summer – Billups is reportedly still considering an offer from Cleveland – isn’t a great sign.
2. How can the Cavaliers add an impact player in a trade?
The Cavs’ ideal scenario would be to add a fourth impact player to their core of James, Kevin Love, and Kyrie Irving, using complementary pieces in a trade. That’s a nice thought, but probably an unrealistic one.
Beyond their three stars, the Cavs’ top contracts include Thompson ($16.4MM in 2017/18), Smith ($13.76MM), Iman Shumpert ($10.34MM), and Channing Frye ($7.42MM). Outside of Frye’s deal, those contracts all have multiple years left on them, and they’re not exactly bargains. Thompson, Smith, and Shumpert are all effective players when they’re playing well, but they’ve has consistency issues. And at those prices, teams might be better off just signing a free agent instead.
The Cavs will still look to include those guys – particularly Shumpert and Frye – in potential trades, but if they want to make a major move, their most logical trade candidate is Love. The former Timberwolf looked more at home in Cleveland in 2016/17 than he had during his first couple years with the team, but he’s the most expendable piece of the Cavs’ “big three,” especially if he could be turned into a top-tier, two-way player like Paul George.
There have been no indications that the rebuilding Pacers want to acquire a pricey veteran like Love, which is why we heard so many rumors last week about the Cavs exploring a potential three-way deal. In such a scenario, Love would be sent to that third team, which in turn would send young players and/or picks to Indiana. It’s an interesting idea, and I believe George would make the Cavs a more versatile and more dangerous team. At this point though, it doesn’t seem like there’s a ton of traction on that front.
3. If the Cavs trade one of their big three, will it definitely be Love and not Irving?
It certainly looks that way. Sam Amico of Amico Hoops reported on Thursday that the Pacers and Bulls tried to insist on Irving rather than Love in a possible deal for George or Jimmy Butler, at which point the Cavs “quickly lost interest.” It’s hard to blame them for that.
All indications are that the Cavs view Irving as a cornerstone piece who can become the team’s franchise player as LeBron enters the tail end of his career. For Cleveland to consider moving its standout point guard, it would have to be a deal for a star who meets that same criteria, and there simply aren’t that many possible franchise players out there. Ones who are as young as Irving (25) and on favorable long-term contracts are even rarer.
4. Will the Cavs be able to use free agency to add any useful pieces?
One advantage of being a perennial title contender is that the Cavs may have a chance to sign solid free agents at a reduced rate. While that has been more common for teams like the Spurs and Warriors in the last couple years (we see you, David West), there may be productive free agents willing to sign on with the Cavs for the minimum to pursue a potential title.
Unfortunately for Cleveland, the club won’t have much more than the minimum to use on free agents this summer. Assuming they don’t shed salary to get out of tax territory, which would be a long shot, the Cavs will lose their full mid-level exception and their bi-annual exception, as well as their ability to acquire a free agent via sign-and-trade, leaving them with the taxpayer mid-level exception. That MLE will be worth $5.192MM and can be used to sign contracts up to three years.
That’s a useful little piece, and should be enough to add a solid rotation player, but there’s no guarantee that team ownership is prepared to use it. With the Cavaliers poised to face repeater tax penalties in 2017/18, a $5.192MM contract would cost the club exponentially more in taxes — the exact amount depends on how far over the tax the Cavs are, but repeater penalties start at $2.50 per dollar spent over the tax, and only increase from there. If the Cavs intend to use that MLE, they’ll have to be very confident that the player they’re signing is worth it, because he’ll be extremely expensive.
5. Is it time to start worrying about LeBron’s long-term future in Cleveland?
In the wake of the Cavs’ Finals loss, rumblings about James possibly bolting Cleveland again in 2018 have grown louder. And it’s not just idle speculation from pundits — reliable reporters like Adrian Wojnarowski of The Vertical have said the Cavs aren’t just assuming LeBron will remain in Cleveland beyond his current deal, and that a move to an L.A. team is “very much in play.”
It may be time for the Cavs to start worrying, but it’s not time for them to start panicking. Forcing win-now moves to appease LeBron could backfire, as they did during his first stint in Cleveland. By the time James left the Cavs in 2010, the team’s roster was stocked with overpaid, underperforming veterans, leaving little flexibility to acquire real help.
While it may seem like the Cavs are nearing that territory this time around too, Irving and Love are far more effective than any player on the 2009/10 roster was, and none of the team’s current contracts is nearly as bad as Shaquille O’Neal‘s (a 38-year-old Shaq earned $20MM in ’09/10, when the cap was $57.7MM).
Still, it won’t be easy for the Cavs to strike the right balance this offseason — their goal is to add immediate help to give LeBron a chance to knock off the Warriors next summer, without taking on the sort of long-term commitments that will compromise their ability to be flexible in two or three years. And, oh yeah, Gilbert probably wouldn’t mind reducing his tax bill a little going forward.
Good luck to the next Cavs’ next head of basketball operations, who figures to have one of the toughest jobs in the NBA.
Here’s where things currently stand for the Cavaliers financially:
Guaranteed Salary
- LeBron James ($33,285,709)
- Kevin Love ($22,642,350)
- Kyrie Irving ($18,868,626)
- Tristan Thompson ($16,400,000)
- J.R. Smith ($13,760,000)
- Iman Shumpert ($10,337,079)
- Channing Frye ($7,420,912)
- Richard Jefferson ($2,500,000)
- Kay Felder ($456,529) — Partial guarantee. Non-guaranteed portion noted below.1
- Total: $125,671,205
Player Options
- None
Team Options
- None
Non-Guaranteed Salary
- Edy Tavares ($1,471,382)
- Kay Felder ($856,082) — Partial guarantee. Guaranteed portion noted above.1
- Total: $2,327,464
Restricted Free Agents
- None
Cap Holds
- Kyle Korver ($9,954,930)
- Dahntay Jones ($1,471,382)
- James Jones ($1,471,382)
- Deron Williams ($1,471,382)
- Derrick Williams ($1,471,382)
- Total: $15,840,458
Trade Exceptions
- Mike Dunleavy TPE ($4,837,500) — Expires 1/17/18
- Mo Williams TPE ($2,194,500) — Expires 1/7/18
- Sasha Kaun TPE ($1,333,420) — Expires 7/15/17
- Chris Andersen TPE ($980,431) — Expires 2/13/18
Projected Salary Cap: $99,000,000
Maximum Cap Room: –$29,933,665
- The Cavaliers’ eight guaranteed contracts, plus four cap charges for empty roster spots, bring the total team salary to $128,933,665. Considering the luxury tax line is currently projected to be around $119MM, the Cavs have virtually no way to get below the cap this summer unless they gut their roster, and will likely end up well into the tax again.
Footnotes:
- Felder’s salary won’t become fully guaranteed until January 10.
Salary information from Basketball Insiders and The Vertical was used in the creation of this post. Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.
Unfortunately the best move for the Cavs is to trade Kyrie. No one wants Love. Trade Kyrie for picks to obtain another player such as George or trade Kyrie, along with some combination of Shump, Frye, Thompson. Sign Hayward or Paul depending what you trade Kyrie for.
Basically your cashing Kyrie in for two stars trade him for a young star ideally if not picks to get a star get salary relief from the contacts you don’t want. And then sign Paul preferably unless you get a pg back in the deal with Kyrie in that case sign Hayward. You get salary relief and you have a Big 4. Preferably Paul, Love, Lebron, George. Then they can get some vets. Wade and/or melo will probably come after buy outs.
Team won’t miss a beat swapping Kyrie and Paul.
If Cleveland gets Paul GS is losing, Paul would get Love and the rest of the team involved. And Lebron would just go stupid on offense.
I hope Dan Gilbert sees or comments.
Kyrie is not a true point. And Paul is a free agent.
I’ll trade Kyrie for Anthony Davis-he is also a cornerstone player. The two-big system in NO will not work. It’s not the NBA of today.
I’m okay keeping Love, but if we can get Porzingis from NY for him or by involving a 3rd team, by all means go for it. KP can switch to KD on pick n rolls and is a rim protector. Same role on offense.
For me, if only we have DeAngelo Russell, I think NY will part with Porzingis. Phil loves Russell’s game.
Dude the Knicks will never ever get rid of Porzingis, just get that out of your mind as soon as possible. And to get Davis you’ll need more then just Kyrie.
Let’s say the two-bigs system doesn’t work, why would the Pelicans trade Davis who’s under control for 4 more years on a reasonable contract vs letting Cousins walk or trade him instead? These trades have to make sense for both sides dude.
And Kyrie is arguably a top 3-5 point guard in the game. He’s an elite scorer who won us a championship making big shots. If you trade him then you might as well just rebuild. Keep in mind that draft pics are no guarantee either. And Irving is only 25.
There is absolutely no way that the Cavs should or will trade Kyrie, unless LBJ leaves and he demands a trade. You guys simply don’t get it. It is NOT a trade one star and bring in another. It’s try and keep as many as you can and add to it. Kyrie had a couple of bad games and everyone wants to harp on that. Ummm….so did Paul George.
Also. this idea of “no one wants Love” is idiotic. Not team that’s REBUILDING wants Love. THAT is a logical statement. Obviously, a Pacers team sanz George or Bulls team sanz Butler traded those players because they felt it was time to go in a new direction.
We play at a time where big men need to have perimeter shooting skills. To speculate that no one would want a legit PF who had 19 pts, 11 rebounds, shot 37% from the 3pt line shooting a high volume of shots at age 28 “only” making $23 mil is a joke. Do you know who else makes $23 mil a year in this new NBA economy? Love is better than Drummond, B. Lopez, Gasol, DeAndre, Howard, etc. He may not block as many shots or protect the rim but he is a legit stretch 4 and that’s the movement now-a-days. I bet you, in an open FA market, Love would get a max contract from at least 8 teams in the NBA. He’s still an elite rebounder and is #2 among all active players in rebounds per game. That’s a better yearly average than everyone except Dwight Howard. Stop underestimating the value of Love and use context. He is the 3rd option of a team with 2 dominant ball-handlers. It’s amazing that he can still post 19 a game.
No one wants to trade for love because no one is beating the cavs or warriors so why would anyone want to trade assets for love. Kyrie is the only asset and it’s not trade Kyrie for another star it’s 2 for 1 with Kyrie. You trade Kyrie and unload Shump, Frye, or Thompson with him freeing up cap space and you trade Kyrie for the assets to get George or for George in general as long as they take on contracts then with the freed up cap space you sign Chris Paul.
Sorry joe, there’s no way any team in any century would trade Kyrie. There’s a reason why James came back to Cleveland and at the top of that list was Uncle Drew.
What the Cavs need to do is so simple but of course Lue is the coach so the adjustment won’t be made. Re-sign Deron and play him at the point and put Kyrie at the 2 already and STOP trying to make him a playmaker, he is a shooting guard and that is all. Don’t tinker with the roster or make any crazy moves, if the Spurs could put GS down 26 with just Kawhi in the playoffs, why can’t the Cavs do it? Lue is just not utiliIizing this team the way it should be, let Kyrie control the offense and let Deron get shots for Love,JR, and Lebron so Lebron won’t have to expend so much energy doing the playmaking Kyrie can’t do consistently. The Cavs stagnant offense is due to the Cavs making Kyrie make plays, he is a shooting guard.
We will suck on defense with Deron and Kyrie both on the same floor though :(
True lol but their offense would he a ton better. I really don’t know what the Cavs should do.
I wouldn’t count on Deron to play a full NBA season but I do think having Deron on the floor with Irving is a good idea and they did do that a few times last year. I think a better idea would be to try and work out something for Rubio since the T-Wolves seem intent on moving him and more for salary relief vs as specific need. Rubio can’t shoot to save his life but he is a great distributor and play maker, won’t really have to shoot from the perimeter much on the Cavs team, is an excellent defender and athletic enough to help against Curry and/or Klay on defense. I would still like to bring Deron back as a 6th or 7th guy off the bench and have a rotation of Irving, Rubio, Deron and one of Smith/Shumpert as a the guard rotation.
Btw, Curry averaged 6.6 assists to Irving’s 5.7. Effectively, the Warriors play position-less basketball and with play-makers like LBJ, Durant and Draymond there’s no need for Curry nor Irving to be traditional play-makers.
Cavs! Your time has passed suck it up
And move on! Golden St. Will be around
For a while. Plus LBJ is LA bound 2018-19
Yea I don’t see GS’s reign lasting long man. There is a reason Minnesota got Butler because they know you need multiple guys you can throw at Durant on defense, not to mention KAT will have a historical season this season coming up and possible be in running for MVP. Not saying they could beat them in a series but Cleveland,SA, and Boston are not far off(if they get Hayward and George).
Cavs in ’18 easy peasy
Lebron isn’t going to LA. Trade Kyrie, but throw in some of the bad contracts preferably Shump and Frye see if you get can first round picks needed for George as long as he will agree to 3 year extension rumored with Celtics. Tristan still as value. If you can package Tristan and Frye or Shump for first round pick and get salary relief for something also if it helps get George. Sign CP lineup is Love, Lebron, George, Paul. We can find a big somewhere Tristan is good but let’s face it big men are a dime a dozen.
Melo and Wade will be wanting to be bought out. No one is trading for Melo and Wade because no one can compete with GS or Cleveland. Wade and Melo can come of the bench so we will see much less fall off then last year with 2nd unit.
That’ll be a pipe dream for any GM to
Pull off. Especially if you’re going to get a
Rookie (billups) who has no experience?
Billups wouldn’t be the GM. They would bring in a vet GM to work with him however.
Stop playing 2k bro.
That’s why youre not a GM.
Kyrie to the Knicks for Melo and Courtney Lee. Thompson to the Lakers for Brook Lopez (expiring contract). JR to the Rockets for a pick/expiring contract. Sign Paul and once DWade gets bought out u can get him cheap. And LeBron is happy again.
I just vomit in my mouth. Kyrie for Melo? Really? And Porzingus right? And then Thompson for Lopez? Uggg.
I often wonder what’s in the head of those that make such claims. Kyrie for Melo. Melo will come to the Cavs in a buy out anyway by the trade deadline this coming season to play off the bench. There’s not a better ball handler in the NBA/world as good as Kyrie.
Then there’s the TT/Lopez. The first thing that should pop in anyone’s head is TT stands for ironman. Missed on game in his entire NBA career. Read that last sentence again. Then there’s Lopez that seems to find the banana peel someone threw on the floors and slips on it and is on the DL for ?? days per season.
What makes anyone think the cavs have any room to add salary or any talent to ad a crucial piece? Lebron throws a temper tantrum, they blow money on what is available and still lose. He needs to take his controlling cry baby ass to LA
No one understands trading Kyrie is to get salary relief so you add two stars. You obviously don’t want to but to get rid of JR, Shump, or TT bad contRacts you have to. You trade Kyrie for the assets the Pacers want for George. Then you sign Chris Paul with the newly freed up cap space. So now you have a starting lineup of Paul, George, Lebron, Love and some big man depending if TT is traded along with Kyrie. Kyrie is the only thing of value. Cavs are win now and Kyrie already saying he will ask to be traded if Lebron leaves.