9:33am: The NBA has been “aggressively” lobbying team owners on the merits of the lottery reform proposal in recent days, according to Chris Mannix of The Vertical (Twitter links). Mannix adds that there’s “cautious optimism” on the proposal being approved, but it’s not a lock.
Meanwhile, following up on his previous tweet (noted below) about the other issue on the table, Wojnarowski says the Competition Committee’s proposal on DNP-Rest would give commissioner Adam Silver the latitude to fine teams for resting healthy players in nationally televised games, or for resting multiple healthy players in a single game.
8:50am: The NBA’s Competition Committee has formally recommended the league’s proposal on draft lottery reform, and a vote on the issue will take place at the NBA’s Board of Governors meeting later this month, according to ESPN’s Adrian Wojnarowski.
As we’ve detailed in previous stories, the highlights of the NBA’s proposal are as follows:
- The new system would take effect for the 2019 NBA draft.
- Rather than having odds of 25%, 19.9%, and 15.6%, respectively, for the No. 1 overall pick, the top three lottery picks would each have a 14% chance.
- The odds for the remaining lottery teams would increase by 1-2% apiece, and would decline smoothly.
- The top four spots in the draft would be determined by the lottery, meaning a team could fall up to four spots instead of three. For instance, the No. 1 lottery seed could end up with the No. 5 pick.
According to Wojnarowski, the vote on the NBA’s lottery reform proposal is scheduled to take place on September 28, when the league’s team owners meet. A three-quarters majority is required, so at least 23 out of 30 team owners will need to approve the proposal for it to officially take effect.
The Board of Governors is also set to vote on the Competition Committee’s recommendation for rules that will curb DNP-Rest games during the regular season, per Wojnarowski. The NBA has altered its schedule to reduce back-to-backs and eliminate stretches of four games in five days, but as we heard last month, new rules regarding resting players are expected to be implemented as well.
Not sure how this will go, I think most ownership/managment teams realize that tearing down and tanking are the quicker ways to become competitive
And in an age where teams that don’t rebuild (Bulls,Knicks) get stuck in mediocre and scrutinized for doing so it’s tough to fully back this change
I agree with Hen1CHC above. Furthermore, which excites the fanbase more, going 24-58 for two seasons and having a #1 overall pick or for the sake of a 36-46 record signing 2 or 3 low key contributors? Also, in today’s NBA, you are either a title contender building super team or in rebuild mode. The middle grown is more fuzzy than ever.