LeBron James Won’t Waive No-Trade Clause

FEBRUARY 7, 7:31am: Following a Tuesday loss to Orlando that one Cavs player referred to as “a new low,” James publicly discussed his no-trade clause, confirming that he has no plans to waive it, per Dave McMenamin of ESPN.com.

“I’m here for the long haul,” James said. “I’m here for this season right now, [to] try to figure out ways we can still compete. I couldn’t give up on my teammates like that. I couldn’t do that. I just couldn’t do it. We put too much into the game every single day. We go out and prepare. Win, lose or draw, at the end of the day, we’re all brothers, and we understand that. I owe it to my teammates to finish this season out no matter how it ends up. I would never waive my no-trade clause.”

FEBRUARY 6, 11:37am: As disastrous as the situation in Cleveland has been lately, the Cavaliers remain the third-seeded team in the Eastern Conference, making it extremely unlikely that the front office would consider the idea of trading LeBron James before this week’s deadline. But even if the Cavs did entertain the thought, a deal wouldn’t be possible, according to Shams Charania of Yahoo Sports.

Sources tell Charania that teams around the NBA are doing their due diligence on James’ situation and his no-trade clause in an attempt to determine if a trade would be remotely plausible. However, LeBron is “determined” to see the season through in Cleveland, and won’t waive that no-trade clause, Charania reports.

While there are several NBA players who have the ability to block trades this season, only three – James, Dirk Nowitzki, and Carmelo Anthony – have explicit no-trade clauses included in their respective contracts. Anthony waived his no-trade clause back in the fall when the Knicks worked out a deal to send him to the Thunder, but James has no plans to follow suit.

The NBA’s Collective Bargaining Agreement allows a team to include a no-trade clause in a player’s contract if that player has spent at least eight years in the NBA and four with his current team. Those four years don’t have to be consecutive, which is why James was eligible for a no-trade clause in his most recent deal, despite having only been back in Cleveland for two years at that point.

The subject of James’ no-trade clause also came up back in July after Kyrie Irving‘s trade request surfaced and there was some speculation that the Cavs might want to launch into full-fledged rebuilding mode. As is the case now, LeBron was said at the time to be unwilling to waive his no-trade clause.

View Comments (42)