The Lakers want Anthony Davis and they want him now.
That’s apparent by their latest reported offer for the Pelicans superstar.
According to reports that surfaced today, the Lakers are willing to give up most of their young talent, draft picks and some cap space in order to pair up Davis with LeBron James. They’re willing to package Kyle Kuzma, Brandon Ingram, Lonzo Ball, Rajon Rondo, Michael Beasley and two first-round picks for Davis and Solomon Hill.
Kuzma is the Lakers’ second-leading scorer and Ingram, the second overall pick in the 2016 draft, is a close third. Ball, currently injured, was the second overall pick in the 2017 draft. Rondo and Beasley have expiring contracts, while Hill is owed over $12MM next season, so the Lakers would be sacrificing some cap space. And draft picks have become increasingly valued assets, so that’s quite a package the Lakers are willing to surrender.
Still, New Orleans doesn’t have to pull the trigger. The Pelicans could simply hold onto Davis and wait for the Celtics to enter the bidding. Boston can’t acquire Davis at this time because it already has a player, Kyrie Irving, who signed a designated player extension. Davis did the same with the Pelicans and no team can have two such players on the roster.
That prohibition ends when Irving becomes a free agent this offseason and the Celtics have long coveted AD. They could put together a package featuring Jayson Tatum and other quality players, plus a boatload of draft picks for Davis’ services.
The Pelicans could also hold out for offers from other teams with a collection of young talent and draft picks. They reportedly want an All-NBA caliber player as part of a deal for Davis and there’s no certainty that any of the players the Lakers offered fit that description.
That leads us to our question of the day: Should the Pelicans accept the latest Lakers offer for Anthony Davis or should they wait until the offseason to deal him?
Please take to the comments section to weigh in on this topic. We look forward to your input.
As a fan I would like to see AD with LeBron to take on the Warriors. If I were the Pelicans though I would stick it to the Lakers and wait for the Celtics, and I would be asking for Tatum, Brown, and at least a 1st rounder. I could see the Pelicans getting more (another 1st round pick or another NBA starter) if Davis were to at least give the Celtics a shot at resigning him.
The Lakers package is way better than your Boston package because Jaylen Brown has really slipped. Jayson Tatum is a nice player but he’s a 6-8 small forward. Yes a very good one but there’s a lot of good small forwards out there.
I have to point out that Brandon Ingram is technically a 6-7 SF, except he’s not as good as Tatum. Soooo…Is the Lakers package really much better than the hypothetical Boston one?
Ingram is 6’10 not 6’7 lol
Yes because the Laker package has about nine guys on it and they’re talking two first round picks.
Boston’s package might be only Tatum, Brown, some third guy and two first-round picks.
But the 3 veterans are on expiring contracts and the first round picks wouldn’t be as good as what the Celtics can offer. Brown has been playing a lot better coming off the bench. The Celtics have won 6 straight again and are only 3 1/2 games behind Toronto now. Nobody really knows what the Celtics offer is. Amico Hoops has a poll asking if we think the Lakers can overtake the Warriors or if the Lakers should hold onto the kids with LeBron aging. So far it’s keep the kids.
Ingram is 6’9″ so dont let facts get in the way. Ingram and Tatum are both immensely talented and young so I find it funny how everyone follows the narrative that Tatum is so much better. I mean have you seen Ingram play night to night? I have. I hope you are watching Tatum play everynight to make the comment you did. Point is there is no way to know which one of these guys end up in the HOF and which one ends up playing in China. I have no idea where Davis will land but one thing is certain. The Pels front office is a joke. They have wasted 7 years of Davis and now they are fumbling over what to do. What I can guarantee is that Nola will come out with far less then they could have
New Orleans has had some of the worst injury luck in the league over the course of his time there, including injuries to himself
Tatum>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ingram not close
Pels havent had a first round pick in 7 years. Those picks get injured? Interested to hear what your assessment of Ingram is. I assume you get to see him play every night?
I have league pass, so ya, but that isnt a revelation
True, they’ve made bad trades. I’m just saying that their injuries to most of their roster over the years were really significant, and it’s not really fair to judge them for that part of it, considering it wouldnt have mattered
still havent told me what you dont like about Ingrams game?
That’s a totally different thing than we’ve been talking about. I’m not saying anything about his potential moving forward if he significantly develops. I’m talking about what he has shown to this point in comparison to others, while also factoring in upside…Ingram needs to improve his defense, which has gotten worse, as I said. His jumpshot has also been a lot worse. Decision making needs to be better, and he needs to be more efficient offensively, and not turn the ball over so often, for his usage. Also cant be a ball stopper. That goes into he decision making. Have to make quicker decisions on fewer dribbles. He is still young. I didnt say he wont develop. I’m saying he needs to improve a lot to be conducive to winning games, which he hasnt been
I dont see Boston giving up tatum for a rental. And I dont see anyone else giving up, or having to give up, as much as the lakers have. Im hoping they say no which after receiving phone calls from Pop and Ainge is what I am sure they will say. In the end the Pels will screw themselves
But we are not talking Ingram or Tatum for Davis. There are many more parts. what would you think a better offer from Boston would be and more important what do you think the best Boston would do, cause thats all that really matters
I think Boston has several iterations of trades they can offer that are better, but I also dont think it gets done for New Orleans without Tatum, so regardless, he would have to be in the deal if they want him…I think it will take a significant amount, as I alluded to. Anthony Davis is a different scenario than other recent situations. He is a super elite player being traded in his prime, which absolutely does not happen, and he has more than only 1 year on his deal. If they trade him now, they’ll get a really significant amount, like I said, but if they wait, the offers would be reduced, although they would still be higher than what we’ve seen for other guys with similar time remaining on their deal
Tatum is better than Ingram. It’s not even close. Not sure what you been watching.
what have you been watching? ESPN? NBA Network? Watch every game? of both players? That how you are sure its not even close?
Jayson Tatum is a stud, and way better than anything the Lakers are offering.
From the Pelicans standpoint..yes they definitely take the trade.
From the Lakers standpoint..I don’t like it. Yea you’re getting AD but I feel like they should include Zubac and KCP and they should keep Rondo and Lance. Leaving yourself with no PG is an off move.
Ya I agree. Much rather have rondo and lance than Pope. And then moving Pope for Jabari and probably signing melo would put 2 Bulky in between forwards with No 3s and no D.. least valuable of any player type in the modern nba next to them
Come playoff time, LeBron plays point forward a bunch anyway. And I would bet on the Lakers picking up a point guard who has been bought out as well.
Is James going to want to cover opposing PGs? Then he’s not really a PG. He just wants to bring the ball up, set tempo & keep control. Sometimes. LA will need a PG. Why not Rondo?
I can only think that Demps asked for him, even though they had him and did not offer.
N.O. Should wait till the summer. Let AD sit the rest of the season and tank and see what the draft order will be. They could potentially get 2 top 5 picks.
I think they have the Lakers desperate attention now.
Depending on what the Suns or a third team would want for Lonzo, I, as NOLA, might not be too interested since he’s expressed his displeasure with the idea of playing in New Orleans.
Hart, Ingram, Kuzma, Zubac, 2 firsts, and eating Beasley/Stephenson/Rondo/some combo thereof is what the Pelicans should be asking for, if not Lonzo too
If they don’t wait then that is criminal. What is the rush? He is under contract still for another season. Celts have 4 1st rounders coming up including Memphis 1st and Sacramento 1st.
I don’t think it really makes sense for the Celtics to trade for him if he won’t re-sign there, especially now that it’s rumoured Kyrie might be leaving.
Rockets?
these rumors have become paid advertisement from lbj’s media/marketing dept
I just don’t see the Pelicans getting a player who is currently All NBA talent or on the cusp from anybody who doesn’t feel they can resign him. I think their best bet is to take the Lakers deal because that’s three more than quality players on their rookie scale deals. If anything else, they hold out for Tatum and Brown if they feel those two are closer to All NBA. Worst case scenario is they make a trade similar to the Leonard/DeRozan deal and lose whoever they get in return for Davis anyway.
Take the youngsters on rookie deals you like best (from either Boston or LA) and see which one gets to All NBA. Then lock them into a 5 year max. extension.
And don’t take a bunch of first rounders for Davis unless they’re redirected from another team. Getting picks from the team you trade Davis to will only net you late first rounders.
If they can get Tatum and the Celtics picks, then him and the picks are much better than the mediocrity of the Lakers offer
Well…
1. This assumes that the Lakers have the best/only offer out there. Ingram and Ball haven’t exactly lived up to the hype, and those picks probably aren’t going to be great.
2. It also assumes that better offers will be available in the summer. You would think that Boston will be reluctant to offer a huge package with Davis seeming to have no interest in staying there. After Boston, the next best package would have been Porzingis and the #1 pick… except the Knicks already traded KP and don’t yet have that pick, nor are they likely to. It’s hard to picture a better offer materializing in July.
3. Between the drain of constant tension, risk of injury, and potential improvement of their lottery odds, there is plenty to promote the idea of trading now versus waiting until the summer. I would definitely take the best offer now (assuming it’s acceptable)
I’m a Celtics and Pels fan. I’d love to see AD with the Celtics. But, if I’m the Pels. You have to take this offer. You’re not going to get a better offer from the Celtics. I would squeeze the Lakers for an additional 1st plus maybe Hart. Then, flip Ball to the Suns for Jackson and a 1st. Might even be able to squeeze more than that out of the Suns. That would end up being Ingram, Hart, Kuzma, Jackson, and 4 1sts plus getting rid of Hill’s contract. The Pels would have a nice bunch. Would be funny to see that team outplay the Lakers next year. It won’t happen, but would be some hella karma. Maybe the Peks could win the lottery and get Zion.
The Pels should target Tatum and the Celts picks. He’s going to be great
I don’t see the Celtics including Tatum in a trade for potentially only one year of Davis, especially when it’s rumoured that he won’t sign an extension there.
It’s obvious Boston isn’t on his list. If Boston is willing to lose their absolute best player to rent Davis knowing their only star may be leaving is crazy. They could be essentially blowing up the entire advantage the Nets handed them and end up restarting.
you lost all credibilty when you called tatum their “absolute best” player
That’s the question if Tatum is in the deal. If he is then Celtics have the best package. Davis would be turning down a lot of money not to resign with the team he’s with too. Also, it’s not like he’s a picture of health, so he should want the largest longest deal he can get
Tatum has to get way better to be allNBA, which is the standard stated by NO. Being better than Ingram is not enough to have the quality offer. Lakers have the quantity offer and Kuzma > Tatum > Ingram > Brown anyway.
Tatum vs Ingram? Try Tatum vs Kuzma.
If I’m the Pelicans, I take this trade in a heartbeat. We all know how smart Danny Ainge is, and we know he’s not giving up Tatum for a year of Davis. the Lakers are offering a full big 3 of young stars, alongside two FRP’s. This could total to 5 above average players and maybe even a superstar in Kuzma. This is worth more than Tatum in my opinion. It would benefit both the Celtics and the Pelicans to end talks with each other.
Lakers are willing to give up their entire four year rebuild worth of young talent. If Boston matches that they are headed down a bad road after the rental.
Let’s see Davis walk and take a shorter contract worth less money. I bet he wouldn’t. That guy is a huge gimp and gets hurt constantly. He awesome, but extremely injury prone. He can’t be picky and take a shorter less cash offer with his health
Only a true Laker homer/gomer would insist on a quick draw trade to Lakers for their junk & late first rounders. Any NBA GM worth his salt would wait to see the deals/opportunities coming up this summer. Are the Lakers going away? They will still want AD this summer and maybe will be more candid instead of playing ”Lets make a deal” with the Pels. It’s like they wanted to rub some mud in the Pels face along with stealing their franchise player. Poor management skills on display so far, Magic has like 60 hours to get it done for Lebron/Paul the guys who put this chance together.
This offer isn’t garbage it’s a really good deal…if the can get some players from the suns for Lonzo like Josh Jackson plus a future first why not?
For real suns wanted lonzo in the draft and settled for jackson. They arent the brightest franchise so i could see them adding in another 1st. He could very well be the next jason kidd or steve nash for suns.
Lmao and celtics homer say “wE hAvE tAtUm” you obviously dont know your franchise, your gm is a snake and only makes deals in which he wins, adding ad for 1 year for your entire trove of youth and picks would be death. Throw in that kyrie wont even resign because celtics thought about trading him at the deadline last year no one wants to play there. Sorry man
Says true Boston fan lol
I don’t see the Celtics topping the Lakers offer if the report is true that Davis won’t sign long term there. I’d take the lakers offer if they’re actually willing to trade all the young guys, picks and take on Hills contract.
Yeah take the offer! I hate the thought of AD being shutdown…both cause he’s awesome and should be playing. ANND He’s on my fantasy team!!!!!
I suggest they make the trade and move on. He could blow his knee or Achilles out any day.
Yes. Get this over with. That’s a pretty damn good haul.
I wouldn’t even pay that if I was the Lakers, get a lesser star for less and try to sign someone this summer maybe Lenord.
This is about the best the Lakers can do, but the Celtics can offer the best package. The Celtics have better players in Brown & Tatum, as well as better draft picks. Their own picks, plus the Clippers, Kings, and Memphis 1st’s. The Lakers picks would end up in the 20s. The Memphis pick will be a high lottery pick when it conveys.
The problem for the Lakers is their young guys haven’t progressed. Sure they were high picks, and are seemingly talented, but so far outside of Kuzma they’ve been disappointing. I wouldn’t blame the Pels for taking the offer, but I think they will have more teams involved in the summer, when they will also know who has what pick in this years draft.
Do Celtics give all that to rent Davis and risk blowing every advantage they have built over these years. I wouldn’t, I wouldn’t give what the Lakers are offering and they know he will resign. Davis is hurt a lot, and it’s a great FA class and Lakers have the money.
I wouldn’t actually call Ingram disappointing. his scoring ave 9.2, 16.5 and 17.2. FG% .400, .470 and 4.87. He is immensly talented and still very young. You say Boston can offer more? Make an offer. Go ahead. You say Tatum and Brown are better and they’re draft picks are better. Lets have some fun. Make a better offer then Davis and Hill for Ball, Ingram, Kouzma and two number 1’s. Ill wait
Rofl
Again…several other teams, including teams he would likely sign with, can currently offer better deals than the reported Lakers offers. I think it’s about weighing those offers against a potentially reduced Celtics offer, with him coming with less years of control than right now
Who can CURRENTLY beat this offer on his list of teams he’d sign long term?
Off the top of my head Heat, Milwaukee, Clippers, Toronto, Knicks. A couple of those teams arent currently on his list, but either could convince him to sign, or wouldnt care either way, and would go all in regardless
HOW can they offer better trades? Milwaukee can’t they aren’t trading Giannis.
I don’t see how any of those teams has better players to offer. NY has the potential #1 pick but that’s not gonna happen now that’s a summer deal.
Any specifics? Cause I don’t buy it
I already posted a potential Heat or Milwaukee offer that beats it, but if you over value those Lakers prospects, maybe you don’t think so. Like I said, Kuzma is the best of the ones mentioned, but I’d want Josh Hart over both Ball or Ingram. None of those Lakers have done anything conducive to winning games.
Well I don’t see your potential offer you posted. I think it’s ridiculous to think they could. Please re-post so I can pick your idea apart!
Ball and Ingram are 21! I’m not saying they are great now but as a guy who isn’t a Lakers fan but an NBA fan I think they are pretty damned valuable and have great potential. Kuzma is 3rd best. Yes he’s better now but he is 24.
I’m not arguing Ingram and Ball’s future. They could still develop, but they’re going to have to improve drastically, especially Ingram
I’ll copy paste the entire thing I’ve said, but I doubt you’ll agree. I’m not suggesting the Lakers offer is total garbage. It isnt. I’m just saying multiple teams can beat it, and there are others that can at least make a comparable offer.
“I think several teams can at least make a comparable offer, and there are arguably multiple teams that can beat the Lakers offer.
I also think the Porzingis trade confirms the thought of what it would take for Davis being at least 2, possibly 3 young pieces, at least 2 1st round picks, and 1-2 potential swap picks, but you never know
Obviously Boston is locked out for now, unless they wait to trade him in the offseason, in which case he will have less team control. Heat should essentially try anything to get him, obviously. These are a couple of ideas for possible offers that I could see, although there are multiple iterations that probably work. I obviously wouldnt say they are a favorite, but I think they can put up a comparable offer to other teams.
Josh Richardson, Bam Adebayo, Kelly Olynyk,Rodney Mcgruder, 2019, 2023 1st round picks and rights to swap 2020 1st rounder for AD? Not sure that’s enough. Maybe change the 2020 swap for a 2022 swap, with that being a more important draft
Milwaukee could make an interesting offer, although their picks are locked up a bit due to protections. They can offer Brogdon, Snell, Thon Maker, Brook Lopez, DJ Wilson 2019 1st round pick and rights to swap 2021 and 2023 1st round picks for Davis, which would be amazing lol
I also think the Clippers can make a really good offer. I arguably like their assets better than the Lakers. I feel like a couple of the Lakers assets have also lost some value this year. And I could also see Toronto making it interesting to try and add him to keep Kawhi. The Knicks are more realistic now as well, and there are some dark horse teams that could have the assets to pull it off as well. If Hill has to be in the deal, then those teams have deals to match salaries. Maybe he does end up with the Lakers, but I dont see that as being the best trade for New Orleans”
whick Laker assets have lost value this year?
Ingram
How?
Are you trolling or genuinely asking? B/c just look at his numbers, and I dont even have to explain it. He has been really bad this year on offense, and has regressed defensively, with the exception of a couple of games, and they’re better without him on the floor
Ingram has maybe lost some value but he’s been so much better without Lebron
Ingram is better when he doesnt think he is point gaurd
Im asking. If you want me to look at his numbers they say he is in his third year averaging 17 on almost 50 percent shooting. And his numbers have steadily gone up in each of his three years. Which is more then Tatum can say. But yeah, its so obvious tatum is so much better.
If all you care about is counting stats, that is your first problem
Counting stats is not all that I look at but you told me to look at his numbers. I watch the guy play every night. That counts for more than numbers. Plus half the games I watch are in person and Im able to watch far more of the court then the part the TV gives us. Ingrams biggest issue is that at times he feels he is a point gaurd. He will bring the ball down the court, dribble out the clock, then turn the ball over while forcing up a shot. When he plays within himself and doesnt try to force the issue he is a very productive player and Id veture to say one of the better 21 year olds in the league. I dont get to see Tatums games so I wont judge him since all I have to go on is his numbers and it is hard to judge 20 year olds numbers
The issue we’re having is the idea that I’m suggesting these guys are bad. I’m not suggesting that. I’m saying they’re just not as good. Tatum is also a lot better than any of the other players in any of the offers I’ve mentioned. He is already better than expected on defense, allowing him to play arguably all 3 wing positions, while also being just as polished offensively as he was supposed to be, with room to grow, as well as having a better outside shot than expected. He is pretty much everything you want Ingram to be eventually, and is still younger than Ingram
Yeah I agree Ingram looked really good lately and without Lebron on the court with him.
The Miami trade is pretty good but still not as much potential – and it’s hard to see them wiping all their assets with no chance of getting other pieces before AD contract is up making him impossible to re-sign.
The Milwaukee trade is NOT better in any way. I’d rather take Ingram alone over Brogdan and DJ Wilson and Maker. And their picks are even worse than Lakers picks.
I don’t see how Clippers can beat it either. Expiring guys like Harris won’t help…Shai is good but I don’t see who they can really offer.
Only Celtics if their willing to pay enough for a potential rental. And maybe NY if they win pick 1. Toronto with Siakam and OG isn’t enough either
Ingram can be really really good as soon as next year and may even really step up if he’s traded – his fit with Pels roster is great
Well, I entirely disagree, but it’s your opinion, and I do think they’re at least all comparable offers, as well as dark horse teams that could potentially be in as well. Brogdon is better than anyone being offered by the Lakers by himself, by the way…but ya, I’m not going to suggest there is no way New Orleans takes the Lakers offer. I just dont think it’s their best offer first of all, and secondly, I feel like its not the best offer for New Orleans
Gotta be their best offer, its everything. But unless one of the teams on his list step up in the off season or he changes his list of teams no one is going to give up that much for a one year rental. I think the Pels are torn because they feel James has created this situation and dont want to give in. NBA players have more control then players in any other sport.
Their best offer includes Hart and Zubac and KCP.
KCP and Rondo are salary fillers. Magic can tell Demps to take any combination of any players he wants excluded james, two picks and we will take back Hills contract and they still wouldnt deal. The lakers biggest issue this year has been the inabilty to keep a healthy team on the court. Id like to see them not deal for Davis and play out the year. Ball is a big loss. Cant shoot worth a sh$t but plays e;lite defense and the ball moves around when he is on the court. If tatum is as good as you say he is I cant see Ainge trading him without a guarantee that AD re ups
I agree with most of this. I also dont think the Celtics need Tatum to beat the offer, but I think they would need Tatum to get a deal done with New Orleans, if that makes sense…Ball is better defensively than he was supposed to be, especially for a guard with not as much quickness, and his length being not what you would think for his size. However part of why he has been good on defense is being surrounded by other good defenders at most times, similarly to other guys around the league in that regard. I think there is more offensively, but he doesnt have a scoring mindset, which you need in today’s NBA if you’re going to be an offensive star. As ugly as the jumpshotnis, I think if he could knock down a similar percentage that he did in college, he’ll have a chance to do that, in the right environment, if he is more willing to score. That was my assessment of him in college. He reminds me of a bigger, bit lesser version of Dragic in that way, at his best. I’m not ready to call guys busts, although I didnt think he should have gone nearly as high when he did. I had him falling to the mid-lower part of the lottery, and the Lakers taking Fox or Jackson. But his value isnt as high as his potential in the right environment, if that makes sense
Brogdon is really good now but his upside is definitely not as good. He’s similar in value to Kuzma imo…maybe he’s better cause he plays D. Not a better trade asset than Ingram or Ball though. Maker is a wild card – who even knows how old he is
I’m not so sure about that. He is a little older, but I think he has a lot of value if they are able to sign him to a good deal, and he has improved every year. It would be interesting to see him with a little higher usage rate, with his versatility. DJ Wilson has also been really good this year, and he is still really young.
Dude literally sports journalists says MIL has nothing to offer LOL
You mean ESPN perception whatevers that are writing for click bait? Ya they know so much about basketball
Yes the Milwaukee offer is $hiz
LOL
Yes many other teams can offer better deals. But will they, ever?– probably not for a rental.
The question is: Take the Lakers offer? Looks like the only one so far.
Pels need to draft their own All NBA talent, and Demps isn’t up to that (unless he has the top overall pick), then he needs to step aside for someone who is. Of course, take cheap controllable rookies and 2nd year RSC players you like from the trading partner, but the prime assets you should be looking for in a rebuild are 1st round draft picks – as many, and as high, as are appropriate taking into account the players he’s getting. Who cares if the trading partner has them? If not, they have to get them. He can do the work, or let the trading partner do it. But this reactive approach is BS. You can’t let the trade partner’s trade assets determine the content of your package.
If lakers dont get ad now, they will pursue other free agents. There wont be a bidding war, if pels want lakers deal they will take it or the wont. As much as bron and brow would be crazy to watch id rather keep our youth and add fa for just dollars. I think they can say they tried to lebron so he doesnt moan about them being like clevelands owner.
I hope the lakers get screwed in this somehow.
So if they don’t trade him and they bench him, how does that fly w/the NBPA? How does this bode for ANY potential FA signing there, or anyone they draft. They’re just going to do you dirty. Gave them 6.5 years already to get it together. Hasn’t worked out. KD gave OKC 9 years. Looking at where he is now, prob wishes he got out sooner.
Not for nothing, what if he does play, and gets injured. And you end up with a much lesser package if any.
And the Lebron clearance sale is in the works! I get AD is a super star but are you going to sell your future for 2-4 years of possible contention (and a hope that the Warriors super group will break up) before Lebron leaves you in his wake like he left Cleveland? Lebron, AD and possibly Kyrie in a year would be a good team, but at what cost as your bench will surely be lacking. And if the Warriors still can keep their core together this LA superteam will still be no match.
Oh yeah… when will Lebron fire Luke Walton and install Brian Shaw as his west coat Tyron Lue??
Lakers going to end up like the Knicks about a decade ago: trade the entire roster away for one great player and be stuck underachieving… because they traded the entire roster away.
I wouldn’t let AD play again until a trade goes down. Pelicans play him he has a serious injury and they are DONE
Who cares for the Pels, as an NBA fan I wanna watch AD ball out as he has this season, the best individual season of a player for the last 40 years, Pels hasn’t got the right to take the show away from paying fans, as simple as, when AD is fit he has to play!
The best viable offer is from Brooklyn or NY. If Davis likes NY then he will probably accept Brooklyn also after time there. Thus Davis would not be a rental.
Zion and DeangeloRussell, RFA, trumps Ingram, Kuzma or Tatum. The Lakers offer is good but requires more work to condense the head count.