The NBA has said it will allow teams to reopen their practice facilities as early as May 8, one week from today. However, as Sam Amick and Joe Vardon of The Athletic detail, at least half of the league’s 30 teams are located in areas that have stay-at-home orders in place beyond that date, and some teams without those mandates in place are still weighing whether or not to actually reopen their facilities next Friday.
Amick and Vardon note that the NBA has said it will attempt to make “alternative arrangements” for teams in areas that won’t be open for business by next Friday. The Lakers, Clippers, Warriors, and Kings are lobbying California Governor Gavin Newsom to include them in the second phase of the state’s reopening plan in the hopes of returning to their facilities by the third week of May, sources tell The Athletic.
Within their report, The Athletic’s duo also digs into the extensive safety measures the league has put in place for teams as they reopen facilities and explores the competitive imbalance concerns that could arise if certain teams are back at their facilities while others are still locked out.
“The thing I keep hearing is the whole competitive advantage idea,” a player on a team that could resume individual workouts next week told The Athletic. “If we open up half the teams’ facilities when it’s safe, what’s a team like Brooklyn going to do? That’s a question because I certainly have no idea what that looks like.”
Here’s more on the issues the NBA is working through as it considers how and when to resume play:
- If the NBA attempts to resume the season in a “bubble” location, what would that look like? Tim Bontemps and Brian Windhorst of ESPN break it down, examining how many people would need to be in the bubble, what role COVID-19 testing would play, and how long it would take to finish the season. Interestingly, sources tell Bontemps and Windhorst that the league has rejected the idea of quarantining players without their family members.
- The ESPN duo also estimates that if the NBA is intent on playing the rest of the regular season, it would take 33 days to do so, with no more than 55 days required for a full postseason. The league could cut back on that 88-day total by reducing or eliminating the rest of the regular season and/or by tweaking its playoff format.
- While Las Vegas was initially viewed as the most likely location if the NBA were to move forward with a “bubble” plan, recent comments made by Mayor Carolyn Goodman didn’t make a good impression on the league’s power brokers, writes Chris Mannix of SI.com. Goodman suggested in a CNN interview that she was willing to offer up the city’s citizens as a control group to assess what happens when all coronavirus-related restrictions are lifted.
- ESPN’s Adrian Wojnarowski reported on Thursday that the idea of starting the 2020/21 NBA season in December and having it run through July or August is gaining some momentum. With that in mind, ESPN’s Bobby Marks (Insider link) goes into detail on what a new calendar might look like. The highlights include free agency opening on August 30, the trade deadline falling on April 8, and the Finals starting on August 1. Marks also suggests moving the draft to September 8, delaying it until after the first week of free agency.
I’d think the biggest hurdle here is the competitive imbalance. If everybody can’t do something, how can you allow some to proceed?
The NBA could have all the players in the league gather at a large facility somewhere where they would all be purposely infected with the virus and then quarantined. Once they had all tested negative they would be ready to start the season without fear of infecting others or getting infected themselves. Of course roughly a dozen or so players could be expected to die but , you know, the show must go on.
No one would!
The Vegas mayor is all about business and a resumption effort there would be pulled in all directions. TV hosts have made light about her comments, right or wrong.
For the “bubble” (or “compound”) games, staff & AC head counts should be more restricted to allow some to save face when not showing up due to quarantining concerns. Given the use of tablets, not everyone needs to go through the Q. process, so Not everyone should be compelled by normality or careerist expectations or HC badgering.
Perfect simulation of normality is not the goal. One AC, one exec, a couple managers, and the HC is enough, per team; everyone else can use tablets from remote locations. No point in the whole project getting a bad name because of infection by non-crucial personnel.