During an appearance on Friday’s episode of Keyshawn, J-Will and Zubin on ESPN Radio (video link), NBA commissioner Adam Silver made it clear that his preference would be for the play-in tournament to be a mainstay for years to come, as long as the teams and players are on board.
“I haven’t made any secret that I want it to be (around long-term),” Silver said, per ESPN’s Tim Bontemps.
The Lakers/Warriors play-in game on Wednesday was a major ratings success, becoming ESPN’s most-watched NBA telecast since the 2019 Western Conference Finals, per a press release. Silver acknowledged that not all of this year’s play-in games have been on the same level as that one, but suggested that the positive effects of the play-in format go beyond this week’s TV ratings.
According to Silver, the format resulted in a higher quality of play – and stronger ratings – during the final few weeks of the regular season as teams battled for positioning in the standings.
“(It) was causing teams, who frankly otherwise may have thrown in the towel some number of weeks back, to fight for those last playoff spots,” Silver said.
Here’s more from the NBA commissioner:
- Silver confirmed today that the NBA’s plan is for the 2021/22 season to begin at its usual time in October. That would mean two consecutive shorter-than-usual offseasons in 2020 and 2021, but Silver pointed out that the break this summer wouldn’t be as brief as it was a year ago.
- Silver believes we could see sellout crowds – or close to it – for the NBA Finals in July, as Bontemps details. “I think it’s very possible that come July, when our Finals will be, you’ll see essentially full buildings,” Silver said. The commissioner, who added that “close to 80%” of the NBA’s players have received COVID-19 vaccinations, cautioned that the league will still be “fairly conservative” about filling seats on or near the court.
- Silver took exception to the idea that the NBA needs its big-market teams to play well to be successful, suggesting that superstars like Giannis Antetokounmpo can turn even small-market clubs like the Bucks into marquee franchises (video link). He also explained why the NBA fined Hawks coach Nate McMillan for suggesting the league wants to see the Knicks do well: “Nate’s a veteran coach and he knows better. He’s trying to inspire his team to try and suggest the league would somehow prefer some teams over others, and it’s just not the case. He knows it and he’s just got a young team and wants to get them going.”
So the two highest rated games since 2019 both contain GSW. Great. Sure. Keep acting like “its time to blow it all up” – projecting will get you nowhere. GSW is about to run off 5 straight finals starting either this season or next and there’s nothing Lebron can do about it other than roll around the ground pretending he’s hurt.
Five straight finals is a very bold projection. Do you say these things to agitate, or are you just being positive?
Not positive, just foolhardy. And it will be time to blow it all up.
Of course not this year, but after the 2022 season it could happen.
Lol WallyWorld calling someone foolhardy for being a homer is just too much for me
He’s not nearly as smart as he thinks he is and is infuriated about it. Also his team keeps declining.
You sound like a drunken boomer going off in a basement located in the middle of Kansas. Smh
Play-in tournament is here to stay – it’s a ratings success, it helped make the trade deadline more interesting, and it reduced the number of tanking teams compared to previous years.
Disappointed he didn’t also talk about reducing the number of games in future seasons. 82 is too many.
As for the whole “we don’t need big markets to make big money”, give me a break. When people in major media markets like NYC, Chicago, LA, Philly, Dallas, and San Fran are all tuning in to see the local team, it has a huge boost on league ratings. More than 20% of the people in the USA live in just those six markets. Toss in DC, Houston, Boston, and ATL and you’re up to 30% of all the people in the USA.
Higher ratings = higher ad revenues. Super simple.
Nice post –
I agree on the 82 as well….little has been said so far but I think that will be a big issue in the offseason- Get the season back on track to start around Halloween and use the extra time to eliminate B2b if possible around the league
Agreed, 82 games is too long……and agree get back to end of October start and early April finish
Starting around Halloween would make the season shorter, not longer. If you want to reduce or eliminate back-to-backs then the season will have to be longer. Keep the start of the season in mid-October and move the end of the season to late April/early May.
The seasons in Europe for soccer last from September to May.
More games = more revenue. The NFL just expanded to 17 games.
No way will the NBA reduce the 82-game schedule and lose money.
You’re right of course, but a guy can dream…
Unless they find more ways to expand the playoffs…
Whats wrong with the top 8 teams?
Why not just make it top 6?
Just going to throw this out there but…I don’t think maths is your strong suit.
yup, you’re right math is not my strong suit…
here’s my point… this NBA season is 72 games… where teams tries to win as much as they could to be in the top 8…
my question… did the warriors made it top 8 in the west and the lakers top 7? why do they need to battle it out facing the no. 9 & 10?
another example… a student in high school maintains his grade at 85% and he’s in the top 10, suddenly, the principal decided, he’s gonna need to take one examination (to prove he belongs in the top 10), with the students being in the 9th, 11th & 12th…
They decided it at the beginning of the school year so he should have known to study harder
82 games are ok, I actually think if they cut the offseason to 2 weeks of total rest, 2 weeks of ramp up work & 2 weeks of friendlies… that gives you 10 & half months of season, 2 for the playoffs, 8 & half months for the RS.
What does this mean is that now teams play 82 games in 6 months, or 13/14 per month… but if you increase the RS to 86 or 87 games (every team facing the conference teams 4 times & other conference 2 times, or teams facing each other regardless conference 3 times) then you would be playing over the 8 & half months only 10 games per month, with much more rest & time to practice during the season you could achieve a lot of the development you do in the off-season.
Anyway I always thought they should increase the length of the season & the total number of games, while giving more time to rest for the players, to me it seems is a win win for the league, fans, teams & players, right?