Despite a pair of weekend reports suggesting that Wizards guard Bradley Beal is contemplating his future with the franchise, he has not yet requested a trade, according to multiple reports.
Adrian Wojnarowski of ESPN (video link) said on the Woj & Lowe special on ESPN on Sunday that Beal hasn’t asked the Wizards to be dealt; Fred Katz of The Athletic says there hasn’t been a demand, a request, or even a “timid suggestion” for a trade; and Chase Hughes of NBC Sports Washington writes that the All-NBA guard has remained in contact with the Wizards’ front office and has given the team no signs that he’s unhappy.
Previous reports from Bleacher Report and The Athletic suggested that Beal might make a decision on whether he wants to remain in D.C. before Thursday’s draft. A trade would be easier to put together before that draft, since it would allow potential suitors to offer 2021 picks and give the Wizards the opportunity to select the players they want with those picks.
However, Hughes cites one source who pushed back on the idea that Washington needs to decide its course within the next four days, pointing out that Beal is under contract next season and not every trade offer would center around 2021 draft picks.
One team whose offer would be heavy on 2021 picks is Golden State, and Wojnarowski (video link) views Beal as the primary target for the Warriors, who don’t seem inclined to get too involved in the Ben Simmons sweepstakes. If Beal isn’t made available via trade, Wojnarowski expects the Warriors to use their picks at No. 7 and No. 14 this Thursday.
Of course, even if Beal is available, there will be other teams in the mix besides Golden State, as ESPN’s Zach Lowe observes (video link). Lowe believes the Wizards would seek more than Andrew Wiggins, James Wiseman, and the Nos. 7 and 14 picks from Golden State in any Beal deal, suggesting that Washington would likely also ask for the Warriors’ 2026 first-rounder and a pick swap or two.
Here’s more on Beal:
- Beal has always looked for reasons to stay in D.C. rather than to leave, according to Wojnarowski. “He loves that organization,” Woj said. “He loves that city.”
- While the Wizards said Beal would have a say in the team’s head coaching search this offseason, the star guard was a little frustrated that his top pick for the job – Sixers assistant Sam Cassell – didn’t get a second interview, sources tell Katz. It’s unclear, however, if that will be a major factor in Beal’s decision on his future.
- If Beal does request a trade, the Sixers, Heat, and Hawks are among the teams that could join the Warriors in the bidding, sources tell Katz. Hughes, meanwhile, suggests that the Warriors, Heat, Celtics, Trail Blazers, Lakers, and Mavericks are some of the clubs that would likely intrigue Beal.
- The Thunder have made it known around the NBA that they’d be interested in participating in a Beal trade as a third team, according to Hughes.
- The Wizards haven’t received any indication that their other star guard – Russell Westbrook – wants out of Washington, a team source tells Hughes.
I prob am wrong but I’m never thought of Bradley Beal being that good. I see him as Kris Middleton, not bad, but not worth that kind of haul
The teams around him have always been terrible. I mean he literally found a way to co-exist with Russell Westbrook last year, no one deserves to have to do that.
If Wiggins can turn into a good defender playing with Draymond/Kerr, Beal’s defense will absolutely get better playing with them.
I think GSW is offering WSN all the picks including this years, futures and swaps, and Wiggins, mayb Poole, maybe Oubre sign and trade too, but not Wiseman.
Yeah, no one deserves to play with greatest pg since Oscar Robinson
I think playing with Magic Johnson would’ve been fun.
Did you mean Oscar Robertson? How can he the greatest if you can’t spell his name? Trolling because you know Im going to say Curry better, because Curry is the #1 PG all-time, then Magic, then ROBERSTON, Russ is barely in the top 10 and doesnt even really deserve to be.
Also both ROBERTSON and Curry are not ringless ballhogs – Russ is. Russ’s game will never ever win a title in the NBA, it would have already if it actually worked, but its not a 1-1 game, its a team game. Russ’s “me do everything” flies in the face of it being a team sport, his stats are all fraudulent because they came in losses.
Curry the GOAT at point?! That’s bold. Wrong, but still bold.
I’d go Magic as the GOAT, and it’s not close. Isaiah Thomas second, then Oscar followed by Steph
I think it is unfortunate when people try to compare generations. Oscar Robertson could play in any generation, and be great. His career totals are much less as are other stars from that era because they played many fewer games during the regular season and only a couple of rounds of playoffs. There were only a dozen teams then, no 3 point line, much less one on one play, more emphasis on all around play.
It’s unlikely Washington wants Oubre. Any Beal trade involves Wiggins.
Beal was the 2nd leading scorer this past season. Beal trade will recoup the Wizards a BOATLOAD!!
To be fair opinions on Middleton vary a lot too. So I’m sure the people high on Middleton probably see him as Beal-esque as well.
I think you likely are wrong, but I also will say that shouldn’t be worth a James Harden type haul either.
I think he is a Booker type player..depends on who his PG is .. He is an absolutely elite scorer and a very good player without the ball .. put him next to Luka and he will fly … of course the defense, it would be another issue
I don’t necessarily disagree. I don’t think Middleton is as prolific a scorer as Beal, but I don’t view Beal as a 1a type guy either. I think both Middleton and Beal are very good 2nd options.
I feel you’re wrong. Beal is a phenomenal player.
lol beal is a scoring champ threat while middleton is streaky as hell. Beal is better player. idk how u can compare them when Middleton has had better teams
I mean technically Beal can request a trade any time up until draft day, GSW has traded picks on the day before and they can do it again.
Lowe and Woj are usually pretty plugged in. It sounds like Golden State is aware this is their best chance to obtain a third (or fourth, depending on how you look at it) star and catapult themselves back into front-runner status while Curry is still in his prime.
Wiseman, 7, 14, and future picks is a lot for Beal – it’s almost definitely an overpay. But to people who say they shouldn’t – what’s the alternative?
Do you really think the team they had last year – with Curry near 2015 levels – is a contender just with the addition of Klay?
I guess it’s possible, but I’d lean hard towards probably not. So I think they have to overpay now to make one last run. Especially if they’re not high on Simmons (which with Morey running things would almost certainly require an overpay as well, and probably a 3rd team too).
All of that and Wiggins is not only an overpay, but the the dubs are hurting for height. Of course there are a few bigs out there for the vet min
Very steep price to pay. Does Beal mesh with Curry and Thompson? Seems like they may be short a few basketballs.
Remember when they had this guy named Kevin Durant and they won 2 titles? Curry would do what he did then, step back a bit. He is perfectly fine with doing it.
No way Beal equals KD.
@Buckman, this is true. Beal has never gone searching for 3 other superstars to help him win a title. Not saying KD isn’t good, but he’s not everything some make him out to be.
That’s not even close to the point I’m making but I’ll remember to keep it simpler in the future for you, Buck.
He didn’t say that Beal was equal to KD. Read again from the top. @paindonthurt was questioning how Curry would fit with another player (Beal) who needs the ball a lot and @philliesfan215 was just reminding him that Curry did just fine with Durant.
It is pure fantasy … but I think Houston should intervene in this trade ..
Houston In: Wiseman / # 7 / # 14
You get a super rebuild package ..
Wiseman Wood # 7Kuminga? KPJ # 14 (Giddey?)
Wizards
In: # 2 / Wiggins / # 23
He gets Green who could be as good as Beal, in the future.
Warriors
In: House / A. Bradley / Beal
You get a star superstar and some decent RPGs.
As a Rockets fan, I would 100% not do this trade.
I’m not against this trade as a GSW fan.
As a Warriors fan, I don’t think the Rockets are stupid enough to make this trade.
Curry was way past 2015 in 2021, I can see your point. I think they are super high on Wiseman but will trade almost anyone else being mentioned.
Hawks could be scary good if they get Beal. The salary matchup could be tricky, might have to sign and trade Collins. But giving up Reddish, Huerter, Collins and some 1’s would be worth it. A lineup of Trae, Beal, Hunter, Bogie, and Capela? Figure out the bench later.
We’re scary good without Brad Beal. He’s definitely 1 of the best guards/scorers on the planet & very much in his prime but I still wouldn’t give up Dre, Cam or John for him. If DC is intrigued by an offer like (Bogdan or Huerter) plus Gallo, Okongwu & a couple of 1st rd picks then I could agree to that. If not we’ll be better off with our current squad
Dre and Okongwu are off limits for me. I think they both have star wrote all over them if they can stay healthy. But JC has had four years to turn into a dominant player, and he hasn’t done it yet. He’s a really good player but he’s not a difference maker. Cam could be but I doubt DC makes a deal without him. If you think the Hawks can run it back and win it all you’re crazy. They barely got past the 76ers and they’re going to improve. Brooklyn will be healthy and the Bucks beat us without their best player. Not to mention, if you do make it through the East you gotta deal with the Lakers, Suns, Warriors, Nuggets, and Jazz. If they do run it back, I expect a top 4 seed but no ECF.
I love O but I highly doubt he ever becomes a star. It’s harder to be a star at the 5 than any other position & he’s not the type of guy that’s gonna score 25-30/gm like Embiid/Jokic. I do think he can be a very good NBA 5 for yrs tho. And ik for a fact that DC would love to have him. He honestly has more value to them than he does to us bc he won’t be starting anytime soon in ATL but he’d probably be starting next yr in DC. They wanted him badly in the draft & would definitely want him in any Beal trade with us. Having Capela makes O expendable if the return is a guy like Beal… John been a dominant player for yrs now lol. He was a 20/10 guy for the last 2 seasons before we added guys like Gallo & Bogi who took alot of his shots/touches. John is not only extremely productive, he’s extremely efficient & extremely versatile as a scorer & all around player. John been dominant since his 2nd yr in the league fr. Also we have no replacement for him. We’d be losing 1 of the best 4s in the league with no starting level 4s left on the team or available in free agency… I feel u if u think DC may not wanna do a deal that doesn’t involve Cam. My thing is they can have Kev but if they insist on Cam that’s a no deal. Cam (as well as Dre) has much more potential than Okongwu as far as becoming an all-star type player. Both those guys way more dangerous offensively… Lol dude if you DON’T think the Hawks can run it back & win a title next yr, YOU’RE crazy. We “barely” got by Philly with 2 starters out & Bogdan was a shell of himself, playing hurt from the start of game 4 to the rest of the series. Beat them 3 times on their home court including a gm7. Brooklyn might be healthier next season & they very well might not but ATL will definitely be healthier next season. We had multiple starters out the entire season & the bench was injured even more than the starters. The Hawks are clearly the team in the East that’s gonna improve the most bw this season & next. Young talented guys that just got valuable playoff experience, getting a full season & training camp with 1 of the best coaches in the league, finally getting healthy after a injury riddled season. Keep sleeping on the Hawks lol we see how that went for u this season
sweet mother mary, please no more essays like this – its in the rules of the site, thanks
You make some really big “I know for a fact” statements and there is NO WAY this is “FACT” (unless you are ” IN FACT” the GM. I love your enthusiam but I too only read half your post and found the flaws.
I know this for a FACT. If you’re not John Collins’ burner account, then you’re by far the biggest homer on this website.
I’m not suggesting you stop posting your opinions in public. But if you chose to stop I would support that decision.
Thank you…I thought I was the only one who noticed
There’s a reason a championship club like GSW is willing to unload to get Beal. He’s a difference maker. Outside of Trae the Hawks don’t have a real difference maker. And Beal would probably be the Hawks best player immediately.
I just don’t think Hunter and Capela can guard five guys by themselves.
As a person who thinks Beal is somewhat underrated defensively, I still don’t think you can survive with him as clearly your third best defensive starter. He needs to be #4 or 5. That’s one of the reasons the Warriors work. Assuming Klay is Klay, Beal would be their worst defensive starter.
Brad Beal is a much much better defender than Steph Curry. Steph will always be their worst defender… As far as the Hawks, John Collins is a pretty good defender rn. He’s a lil smaller than most of the best 4s but he’s extremely athletic & his instincts are getting better. He was probably the biggest reason that Randle & Simmons struggled so much in their series vs ATL. And Cam Reddish is on his way to making multiple All-Defense teams. If we replace Bogdan & Kev with Brad Beal our defense improves if anything
Beal will make like 2.5M more than Wiggins next season. It’s a steal of a trade to get guaranteed firepower and have the ability to sign him long term. the ability to upgrade there is worth Wisemann and those lottery picks. They won with Zaza Pachulia and Javale. They don’t need a center, they need someone who can score like KD
Finally someone gets it. Wiggins was NOT the sole reason why they were a top 5 defense last year – its literally Kerr’s specialty, he can turn anyone into a plus defender. Losing him and replacing him with Beal is not going to be fatal like so many are “feeling bad about”. Beal’s defense will go through the roof under Kerr+Draymond. Beal has played on terrible teams his whole career, now he gets 3 HOFers, its insane to think that means bad things are on the way.
Yup. The advanced stats actually show that the Warriors were slightly better defensively with Wiggins off the court. I don’t think that’s actually true, but if your advanced stats say that, you’re not an elite defender.
It is pure fantasy … but I think Houston should intervene in this trade ..
Houston In: Wiseman / # 7 / # 14
You get a super rebuild package ..
Wiseman Wood # 7Kuminga? KPJ # 14 (Giddey?)
Wizards
In: # 2 / Wiggins / # 23
He gets Green who could be as good as Beal, in the future.
Warriors
In: House / A. Bradley / Beal
You get a star superstar and some decent RPGs.
Posting this twice didn’t make it a better offer.
Warriors need to get that price way down. No way he is worth that much. Seriously Wiggins and 7th, 14th is enough. Anymore and they can keep him. I rather see him stay on the Wizards let them build a team around him.
Down? Any trade involving Wiggins needs at least one 1st round pick attached to make it worth taking on that contract. Wiggins and 14 gets you out of Wiggins contract. So essentially you are sayin that the dubs should be able to get Beal for #7 straight up? Laughable
So you are saying Wiggins and #14 have no value at all? Now that is laughable. So a guy that brings only 2.5 PPG is worth 2 lottery picks? That seems like a high price for a player that only makes you a slight bit better. Prove to me that Beal is worth 4 players? You can’t.
What I am saying is Wiggins does not have positive value. So if golden state needs to include him for salary purposes then they need to sweeten the offer. I am not saying 14 have no value. I am saying that if Warriors want to include Wiggins in a deal it will have to add 14 to make it worthwhile for the acquiring club. For example, Wiggins and 14 to a team that can absorb his salary for a protected 2nd round pick. The wolves literally just had to include a 1st to unload Wiggins in the dlo trade. If you don’t include Wiggins, 7 and 14 are more appealing.
Wiggins has a net negative value right now for DC. You have to pay him $30 million to lose for next year, then in two years you get some value by trading his expiring contract. That value is almost certainly less than $30MM. So, yes, you have to pay a team like DC to take him. (After last year, there is a small chance he may have positive value to a contender with a hole to fill.) I’m not sure the 14 even makes up the difference, but if DC is looking to trade Beal, the may have to consider something like that.
So, now you’ve paid for Wiggins. Is Beal worth the #7, the 2026 pick and two pick swaps that may well be worthless? My guess is they can get a better offer.
He’s severely overpaid but I’m not sure he’s net negative for a rebuilding team like Washington. They could pay him this season and next and not lose out on much.
They’d just be waiting on their younger players’ development anyway, so the opportunity cost would be minimal – unless you think a big-time FA is looking to sign there post-Beal, which is probably unlikely.
@arc: ‘So you are saying Wiggins and #14 have no value at all?’
Yes, this is what he’s saying. Wiggins is negative value and the positive value of #14 brings it back to even.
If you disagree, think about it this way: if the Warriors offered up Wiggins for free to any team in the league, would anyone take him? The answer is probably a no. He’s not good enough to build a team around (so none of the bad teams with cap space would take him) and he’s way too expensive to fit in as a role player on any of the good teams.
There’s only two more years on that Wiggins contract and he’s 20 points a game. Plus decent defense decent assists. He’s not the scrub the internet makes him out to be. He’s serviceable 20 points a game on a non-playoff team. He’s just not a fourth quarter make the last shot kind of guy. That flat jump shot is likely to miss or a turnover or something like that. But he is perfect on the 15 to 30 ranked teams who have to spend money anyway.
He is literally a league average player by all metrics. Sorry to break dubs fan’s hearts, but Wiggins is not a positive asset. He has already proven what he does on a bad team. Why would washington want him for all that money? Several players in this league are capable of putting he ball in the hoop. No need to spend $30 million a year for league average production
I understand that Wiggins is not a $30 million player but Beal is not that much better than Wiggins when it comes to a over all player. Beal is not a 2 way player he is offense first and average defense. So why throw all you assets at one player and if he gets hurt your team is doomed. I rather see the warriors trade one of their draft picks to build up the bench. Which they can get a good player for. keep Wiseman and give him another year to be better. Giannis was not a instant all star neither was Ayton. Wiseman needs to gain some weight and learn positioning and he will be a allstar.
Bradley Beal is an elite offensive player. He is not slightly better than Wiggins, he is leaps and bounds better. Look at more than just points/game. True shooting %, PER, VORP, win shares. I can understand not wanting to put forth a harden-esque package for Beal, but Beal is unquestionably a top 25 player in the nba. Wiggins doesn’t crack the top 100.
We have the opposite take on the players. I say Wiggins is much better than you say a player out of top 100. I say Beal is not that much better offensive player but you claim he is at the top. I am just saying he is not worth a package of all in on a player. Let another team go all in on Beal. I rather see GSW go after bench players to solidify their big weakness when Curry is not on the floor.
I don’t know what other information I can provide you. If your valuation of Wiggins is so high, be prepared to be disappointed in any potential return. I agree with your takes on team building. But your opinion of Wiggins does not make him top 100…he’s closer to top 125-150 than he is to 100 depending on the metric you use. PER is a pretty basic standard for player efficiency and Wiggins ranked 146 last season. No bias, just numbers
@arc: Beal is way, way better than Wiggins.
Beal:
PER – 22.7
WS/48 – 0.132
VORP – 2.8
Wiggins:
PER – 15.0
WS/48 – 0.080
VORP – 0.8
Wiggins is a good player, but Beal is much better. Plus, Wiggins’ contract torpedoes his value.
Bradley Beal is a 100x better than Wiggins, and I’m not even sure how it’s a debate? Beal can score with anyone when he’s ‘on’, and his defense is good enough with his offensive game. Wiggins is fine, not awful. The contract really detracts from his value though.
@Gary – I don’t agree, but if you’re right, then GSW should just make the deal without Wiggins, and combine it with a separate deal to send Wiggins into some other team’s cap space. If I’m the WIZ, I might do the deal with just picks, #7, #14, 2022 and 2026, and swaps, but the draw is I get cap space to play with while rebuilding. Honestly, if there are takers for Wiggins (without draft pick compensation), then GSW has made this thing WAY too complicated.
DXC, but now you’re talkin three-team trade and that third team taking on Wiggins and giving the Wizards the cap space will want to draft pick compensation. That means less picks going to the Wizards. I guess I don’t see that happening.
How is a serviceable wing (a fair assessment of him, I’d say) worth $30MM to a likely non-playoff team?
Why would a “non-playoff team” afford $30M?
gtown fan, it’s because any team bringing in Bradley Beal has to send out 30 million dollars to the Wizards. If you get a third team involved that may help a little and they can absorb the thirty million but how many teams have 30 million in cap space? Then they’re going to want picks to be compensated for that and thus less picks going to the Wizards !!
There’s only maybe 10 teams that have cap space and most of them are the lower half of the league. You’d love to send out Bradley Beal and not have to take back a crappy contract but I don’t think it’s possible.
The Wizards should settle for no less than that full package from GS. Washington doesn’t have to deal him, and if the rumors are true the pressure is on GS- so squeeze them. If they won’t bite, keep Beal. I would rather see him stay in Washington as well, anyway.
lol Warriors need to give up Wiseman too. why would Wizards trade Beal in his prime for a journeyman in Wiggins and two picks that will be a gamble on average players. Wiseman is the juice of the trade for Washington. if warriors had a top 4 pick id agree with you
Dr. Seuss you’re right but people are saying you have to attach a pic to Wiggins just to trade Wiggins.
That’s 100% not true, Wiggins is a fine trade piece on his own.
What do you think Wiggins will get you straight up on the trade market?
Why do you need to trade Wiggins? He is a solid player so there is no need to trade him. Only reason he would be traded is to make up for the amount of money going out in the trade. If Wiggins was making $20 million a year most teams would be offering a lot for him. His only problem is being paid $10 million over his value. So he is not some scrub you are trying to get rid of.
I am asking a very specific question to the post I commented on. Who do you think is a fair straight up trade for Wiggins since he is “a fine trade piece on his own”. You can’t just ignore the contract unfortunately. I would also disagree on his value. I wouldn’t pay him more than the MLE, but as a compromise I will say he could garner 15 on the open market even though his shooting history doesn’t justify it. He has had one season of better than league average 3pt shooting
I give no Fox you’re right. He’s not a 30 million dollar guy. What can you get for Wiggins straight up? NOTHING !! Everyone in the universe understands that. That’s not the point of this whole thing.
Here’s the facts. 1.Kevin Durant wanted to leave in free agency. 2. the Warriors wanted to be able to plug in another guy, another all-star-caliber Max salary guy. They decide to trade for D’Angelo Russell (who’s not worth 30 million dollars a year either.) So the Warriors traded Russell for another guy with a 30 million dollar slot. And a first-round pick. Wiggins was even a better fit than D’Angelo Russell so that was win-win.
And here’s point I’m making right here. If the Warriors don’t bring in Andrew Wiggins and 30 million dollars they can NOT make a trade for a stud with a 15 million-dollar guy going out. You’d have to include two of those and with the warriors three or four Max guys, the rest of the team is minimum salaries. Andrew Wiggins was absolutely necessary in the grand scheme of things.
Any team trading out Damian Lillard or Bradley Beal or Ben Simmons needs 30 million dollars coming back. Can’t all be draft picks and trading 1 for another, say Bradley Beal for Damian Lillard or Bradley Beal for Ben Simmons.., you’re not going to get five first-round picks either way. Enter
Andrew Wiggins!! This has to be easy-to-understand isn’t it? It’s how I see things and seems like I’m the only one that sees this big picture? I don’t think it’s homerism, I think it’s analysis of the situation with an unbiased eye. Maybe I’m Wrong.
I completely understand where Wiggins value come in, and it’s because he has a max salary for matching purposes. It has nothing to do with his skill level. No argument from me on that front. It’s the only way an over the cap team can acquire another player making the max. But, including him in a trade requires an overpay since he isn’t worth his salary
You just answered your own question. You have to trade purely for cap purposes.
Otherwise I agree, keep Wiggins and Beal – that would be ideal for both Washington, who has no need for him, and Golden State, who could use him as a plus 6th man.
But it’s impossible to pay Wiggins, Beal, Curry, Klay, and Draymond. Hence he’s going to be a part of almost any deal.
We all understand that Wiggins is paid way too much. His next contract won’t be 30 million a year. That was a mistake by the Wolves based on his potential I guess. But you can’t scoff at 20 points a game consistently for 6 years. You guys make it sound like those guys grow on trees.
The reality is the Warriors traded D’Angelo Russell for a first-round pick.. AND kept a 30 million-dollar player slot in the process. Without bringing in Andrew Wiggins, there’s no Bradley Beal trade, no Damian Lillard trade, no trade for a stud. The Warriors are WAY WAY over the cap and bringing in Andrew Wiggins was absolutely necessary if the Warriors want to improve the roster.
I would agree with all you guys in saying Wiggins contract is bad. But there’s just two years left and as I said, 20-point a game consistent guys don’t grow on trees. Plus he’s 6-6 he can guard a small forward he can guard the off guard (or at least try to LOL.)
I don’t think Wiggins AS A PLAYER holds “negative” value. You can throw him in the starting lineup and he won’t be a ball hog and he’ll get you 20 every night. That’s an asset.
Yes, that’s exactly what everyone is saying. Because of the expected return! You want to trade Wiggins for Kevin love, probably don’t need to include any picks.
I give no Fox you’re 100% correct. I’m with you on what you’re saying. I guess I just don’t think Andrew Wiggins is so called trash.
I don’t think he is trash. I just think he is a league average player…he is like a Kyle Kuzma or Harrison Barnes
I give no fox, I don’t mean to fight you but let me say this last thing LOL. Harrison Barnes can’t really create his own shot or initiate an offense. Kyle kuzma is just a bench guy I don’t think he’s a starter on a decent team.
I think Wiggins CAN create an offense for you, he can score off the dribble, he can pull up and the nail the 15 ft jumper 38% of the time. I think he’s a slight Notch above those two guys.
As I said I don’t mean to fight you or to be argumentative. Just discussing basketball back and forth. What’s more fun than that. I appreciate your posts and I think you have a lot of basketball knowledge. Always enjoy reading what you have to say.
All good Gary. I did not take your replies as being argumentative. A respectful debate is fun for all.
The Lakers are interested in everyone. I’m true fan, be even I know it would take a miracle to make it happen. He would have to pull an AD, for his agent, hire RP, and request a trade to the Lakers only, threating
Not to resign with if it’s not the Lakers. Extremely long shot.
#7+#14 & Wiseman are not attractive picks maybe Toronto #4+assets could get a deal done with OKC
Come on Draymond! Keep whispering in Beal’s ear “Demand trade to GS”