The Lakers are exploring a number of avenues on the trade market with the Hawks’ Dejounte Murray arguably the biggest name on the wish list, ESPN’s Dave McMenamin reports.
Murray would give the club some much-needed playmaking and speed out of the backcourt. The fact that Murray is making $18.2MM this season before his four-year, $114MM extension kicks in could provide an additional bonus. The Lakers could engineer a two-for-one swap and shave some money off their luxury tax bill in the process.
However, the Lakers continue to resist including Austin Reaves in a potential deal. The Hawks recently inquired about Reaves, according to McMenamin’s sources, who speculates that the Lakers would have to give up some combination of Rui Hachimura, a future first-round pick, Reaves or other young players to land Murray.
The Lakers don’t plan to pivot to the Bulls’ Zach LaVine, per McMenamin, due to his hefty contract, injury issues and declining production. They could aim lower and pick up some bench pieces instead.
They’d like to add a quality backup guard with Gabe Vincent sidelined by a knee injury. The Jazz’s Collin Sexton and Wizards’ Tyus Jones have been discussed internally as potential targets. They also have the Raptors’ Dennis Schröder and Bruce Brown on their radar.
Schröder, who started 50 games for the Lakers last season, has seen his role diminish with the acquisition of Immanuel Quickley and RJ Barrett. Brown, a defensive ace who was instrumental in Denver’s championship run, was acquired by Toronto in the Pascal Siakam deal.
Brown was the Lakers’ top target with their mid-level exception last summer, according to McMenamin, but Indiana blew them out of the water with a two-year, $45MM offer.
The Nets’ Dorian Finney-Smith and Bulls’ Andre Drummond are two other players the Lakers are considering to fill key postseason roles. Finney-Smith could guard elite wings, while Drummond would give them more size to combat an opponent such as Denver. They’re not particularly interested in the Hornets’ Miles Bridges, a potential alternative to Finney-Smith, because they wouldn’t hold his Bird Rights and Bridges would likely sign a more lucrative contract elsewhere in the summer.
If the Lakers choose not to make a trade or do only minor tinkering before the deadline, they could have more flexibility to acquire another star in the offseason such as the Cavaliers’ Donovan Mitchell or Hawks’ Trae Young, McMenamin writes.
On the day of the draft, the Lakers pool of available first-rounders would grow to their picks in 2029, 2031 and either this year or 2025, depending on whether New Orleans chooses to use the pick L.A. owes it this June or the following summer.
The Lakers have discussed internally the possibility of packaging those three picks, along with players they already have on their books, to pursue that type of blockbuster, says McMenamin.
Lakers lack a lot of assets to pick up players. Going to be hard to get Murray when they are competing against teams with better assets.
They could probably add quality depth for the 29 FRP. Brown + Schroeder
The market isn’t as flush w assets as you think w motivated buyers
If the nominal teams with actual assets ( GSW Utah Brooklyn New Orleans ) of the worlds stand pat lakers will have more buying power the next 2 weeks on the market than you presume
I’d like to still stand pat but the market will be there and I’m afraid they will nose Dive right into it with little regard for the future
Knicks have more assets and are very motivated.
Just because 4 teams might not be in buying mode there is Celtics, Knicks, OKC, Nuggets, Clippers, Kings, Bucks, 76ers, Cavs, T-wolves, and Mavs. That is a lot of competition for Murray.
Celts nuggs clips bucks cavs Minnie mavs have less assets and Matching capabilities
*wasnt nesasarily talking just Murray moreso the whole market
They have draft picks which the Lakers don’t have many of. Lakers other assets in players is not that strong.
Which of those teams have draft picks
Celts yes but where’s there tradable salaries
Mavs worse salaries to trade … can you give me an example from above ?
What assets does that Lakers have?
Why do you keep dodging his questions ARC? No answers? Lmao
Look online features changed profiles again. Now that is lame. Mavs have still more assets hardy, Curry, Prosper, Powell, Williams, Hardaway, and Green. so how is Lakers going to compete against OKC who has 3 1st round picks in this year’s draft? Can you explain how the Lakers can beat that offer?
I’ve said not many that are too spicy but more than those teams above and that’s due to all the frps those teams have sent out over the last few years
I’m not pro lakering this this thing here, I’ve stated many times my affinity for not making a deal – but you seem to be a tad lost on what other teams have to offer which thus creates the marketplace
I stated above a Team like Utah enters the market they blow lakers outta the water , even your warriors … but both might sit idle ( and many more ) thus making the market more accessible to Lal …, so what teams Above have better assets ?
Yep yep, not even close. Laker media think otherwise.
Warriors are not trading because like the Lakers they are not 1 player away from being a top 4 team. I stated many times the Warriors should not trade for anyone because this is not their year. The problem is the media hypes up the lakers making trade when they should just hang on to what they have.
3 LAL picks isn’t moving the needle for DM, Trae, or any other Top-25 guy.
Trae a top 25 guy? I don’t think so. Hawks would jump at 3 1st for him. His trade value is about the same as Lavines, salary dump.
I think Trae has more value in the mind of the Hawks. But who knows. If the Lakers offered 3 unprotected firsts, Reaves and matching salary, I would probably do it if I was the Hawks.
Just do it already…
I don’t know much about the Lakers but even with Murray I don’t think they are a championship contender.
If the hawks gm trades him for anything the Lakers are offering he should be fired. Lakers don’t have enough value to trade.
Stop acting like he’s D.Lillard LOL Russell and a 1st or just wait until you know what labron is going to do
Lol attaching a first is the cost to even trade Russell. Russell=negative value and the pick cancels that out. So Atlanta hangs up immediately. Think they’d prefer to get their picks back from the spurs
DLo isn’t negative value at his price point, lol. And certainly not negative enough for an unprotected post LeBron first to be required to make him neutral. He’s not Evan Fournier from two years ago. Do you think he’s still making 30 mil? With his shooting numbers a bit of playmaking, he’s still got some value. Not a lot, but some. Rui and Reaves are obviously better (Atlanta could do way worse than Rui).
He has negative value, otherwise the lakers wouldn’t want to deal him. They made a mistake resigning him, not a winning player.
By that logic, Murray is negative value, lmao.
You’re severely overrating D.Russell and underrating D.Murray.
Murray has easily more value than Russell + a 1st Round pick multiple years away.
D.Russ isn’t a scrub by any means, but the two just aren’t nowhere close, and much further apart than a single 1st Round pick
Murray is a solid 2-way, versatile play-maker that’s capable of getting you 20+ every night with excellent perimeter defense. He’s a borderline All-Star in his prime.
He’s in a bad situation in Atlanta with a poorly constructed roster, and he’s constantly forced to try and make up for Trae Young’s inability to play defense and pounding the ball into the ground searching for either random contested threes or trying to rack up and cherrypick assists to boost his stats.
I’m not underrating Murray at all, I said justkidding’s logic was faulty.
As far as Russel goes, I also didn’t say he was worth Murray, just that he wasn’t a net negative, in response to benjavin’s comment that he was so worthless that an unprotected first was needed to make him worth a zero. And that Reaves and Rui were obviously more desirable.
So hang up hawks not gonna win anything anytime soon better off selling the team lol
Pelinka shows up, I’ll give him that. But it’s hard to figure he’ll end up in the winner’s circle in the Murray trade battle. I don’t like him for the NYK, but there are plenty of teams that could use a starting PG, and I’d think most of them could beat the LAL trade package.
I thought that DS played well for LAL last season, and I was surprised they seemed to prefer Vincent over him. But, with Vincent is locked in, do they really want both on the payroll, along with DLO, next year?
I felt it was odd as well
It was reported that Vincent was Tors first choice as well over Ds even after Ds played so well for Germany –
Vincent obviously impressed alot of people. Riley prioritized him too (over Strus) for a return to MIA. But I’m a believer in continuity, unless the change is clear upgrade.
Apparently, Schröder wanted to be a starter, and his inconsistency from 3 really bothered the Lakers. Signing for the full middy probably put him out of LA’s price range as well.
Say what you will about DLo, but he can definitely shoot.
As far as the Knicks go, any third star basically has to be very good off-ball, since Brunson and Randle both take up a lot of touches. Or a Center, but who is even available as a Center?
I’d focus on getting a decent second option to play at Center for when Hartenstein comes back and a legit sixth man to make up for the loss of IQ.
Lakers had the full middy to offer but yea I hear your 3 pt concerns and they are/were valid
* Eon – Have no clue why they took down our Bauer Convo , thought everything was completely above board from everyone involved- Shame , Hr has been pretty good about letting rational convos move forward ,
Dont want them. Moving towards the Mlbtr parameters
Yeah, but for Schröder? Not the best use of a team’s middy in my opinion.
Drummond would fit well on the Knicks with his excellent rebounding and ability to score in the low post.
Plus, Drummond has become a completely different teammate now and has matured significantly from his previous days as a Piston.
He’s been humbled, and it has helped him become a better all around player. He isn’t the same athlete he once was, but his basketball IQ has gone to significantly.
Murray is overrated!
Lakers have limited assets to begin with, so to balk at adding Reaves in a deal to get a player like Murray is ludicrous. They severely overvalue Reaves. He’s not a difference maker, not even sort of. WITH Reaves they are Mid at best.
The future is NOW. Bron and AD ain’t getting any younger. Trade anyone and everyone (except those 2) and get a legit 3rd star.
Reeves and Vincent also a 1st, Lakers should keep Dlo.Best outcome be patient don’t overreact when you watch the Lakers they look lazy and bored waiting for playoffs hope it doesn’t bite them in the ass losing games period
Bron is ball dominant. Murray is a bad fit. Murray also needs the ball to excel. His best numbers are when Trae is either injured or resting on the bench. A guy like Lavine or Beal(before PHX got him) is a better fit.
Yea don’t know why lakers are so against lavine. He actually fits rly well and gives them what they need. Only problem is bulls will want reaves which I’m not sure lakers will do (altho I would if I were them)
Because A) Lavine’s defense is worse than DLo’s, somehow, B) he’s injured a lot, C) his contract sucks, D) he’s having a down year across the board, and E) his playmaking ability is negative af, meaning he’s not as good on offense as his raw PPG would indicate. One of the most overrated players in the NBA.
Knicks Knicks Knicks …….
Knickerbockers …….
Let me guess, couple of 2nd round picks and salary fillers get that done, SMH. I Wouldn’t want Reeves anyways. Imagine D-lo with Trae. Only inheriting the trade D-lo headache for a guy you gave up much more for. GM may as well hand in his resignation. Like I said before, Jazz and even the pacers have far far better packages. Utah Wouldn’t even miss their picks, still have plenty.
I rivalize Trae as a Knicks fan, AND thought he was undersized to thrive; even not being the biggest Fan, he does have the aura, the game AND the personality to succeed in LAL. Doesn’t crumble under pressure. Can definitely handle the LA bright lights.
What are the lakers giving Atlanta for Trae? Tomorrow Lakers will trading a drink bottle and a mascot for Donovan Mitchell.
Derozan + Caruso
Typical Lakers, I don’t want to trade anyone that is good in return for good players! If you want Murray then you’re going to have to pay! I thought the Hawks asks were reasonable or is the league going to take care of Labron again!
Veto Veto LOL
If I am the Lakers I would much rather trade Reaves than Hachimura. Trading the former frees up more salary to make more upgrades.
The Lakers assembled what looked like a quality roster in the off-season, and looked like they had enough to compete, but they just cannot stay healthy enough to reap the full benefits.
C.Wood has been completely mishandled and underutilized. Vincent has been hurt. Russell has been as expected. Rui has been a big disappointment. Hayes hasn’t contributed hardly anything, and then they have a bunch of decent role players that have been replacement level at best like Vanderbilt, Reddish, Christie, and Prince.
They desperately need more wing depth, 3-pt shooting, a backup Center, and D.Ham isn’t doing this team any favors with his constant tinkering and seemingly lack of a schematic identity.
If I’m Pelinka, I’m going after Andre Drummond, Caruso, and Bogdanovic from the Hawks.
Lakers Get:
Drummond
Caruso
Bulls Get:
Wood
Prince
Future 1st
Trade 2
Lakers Get:
Bogdan Bogdanovic
Wes Matthews
Hawks Get:
Rui Hachimura
Jalen Hood-Schifino
Max Christie
New Rotation:
A.Reaves
B.Bogdanovic
A.Caruso
LeBron
AD
Bench
D.Russell
W.Matthews/ eventually G.Vincent
C.Reddish
Vanderbilt
Drummond/J.Hayes
I think these moves will add more balance and shooting to their roster, but it should also help the Lakers with their perimeter defense, versatility, play-making, and their rebounding.
Overall, it would definitely be a big boost to their level of talent, but I think most importantly, it would clear things up for Darvin Ham and it would help him better identify everyone’s roles and expectations on the team.
It’s just my two cents, but I think a route similar to this is the Lakers best way to go. I highly doubt they’re firing Ham before the season ends, so Pelinka needs to make these moves to help Ham out.
I can definitely understand why Knicks would want Murray. I think Thibs can make it work. To be honest Murray playing PG is the best place for him. Lakers is a great place for him. Cause that is what they lack, a True PG. Plus this works even after Bron is gone. Murray and AD is a formidable combination.
I just don’t see how they pull it off. Another has to be up for Russell. And I’ve just lost all faith in him. A bench player to me.
Murray best as a PG …..
DeM DeR is best as a SG …..
Knicks best addition is a SG …….
I said Dennis S and Drummond would be good on the Lakers and people are now copying
Dennis has come a long way. Playing with Bron would be a big thing. He definitely fits there. And wouldn’t have to give up much.
Lakers have literally nothing to offer the Hawks for Murray. Nothing that will make the Hawks better now or in the future. That being said… the Hawks will probably do something stupid and just trade him for a crappy player with a high, matching salary.
Lakers are frantic they have an expiring team. Their 2 best players are unlikely to still be playing in 3 years. Even if they are it won’t be at the same level. This is probably the last rodeo for this team. Within 2 years they will likely blow it up and start a rebuilding job. They may offer more for Murray than is reasonable so LeBron can get that 5th ring. Hachimura would be a good place to start. The kid is overrated. Reaves is the one piece they have worth keeping. As far as a backup point guard for the team they could just keep Russell and have him back Murray. That said they will need to offer more than just Hachimura to get Murray. Last the Lakers need another quality big man. Anthony Davis is good but there is only 1 of him. Drummond from Chicago would make sense. In fact it would be tempting to deal for Drummond and LaVine together. They won’t because the gamble on LaVine is too large.I am glad I don’t have the responsibility of being the Laker’s GM. Though I would enjoy the salary. So if they are looking I’m available.