Community Shootaround: Early Eastern Conference Impressions

Coming into the 2025/26 season, the general consensus among NBA fans and experts alike was that the Western Conference would be deeper and much more competitive than the Eastern Conference, where multiple All-Stars – including Celtics forward Jayson Tatum and Pacers guard Tyrese Haliburton – would be sidelined while recovering from major injuries.

The sense was that at least seven or eight teams in the West looked like solid playoff clubs, while several more – including the Mavericks, Grizzlies, Trail Blazers, Kings, Suns, and Pelicans – believed they could break into that group.

So far this fall, the teams at the very top of the West have been just as good as we expected. The Thunder are 15-1, the Nuggets and Rockets only have three losses apiece, and the Lakers, Spurs, and Timberwolves are all at least five games above .500.

But the quality depth we expected in the West hasn’t been there yet. The ninth-place team – Portland – is just 6-9, with playoff hopefuls like the Grizzlies (5-11), Clippers (4-11), Mavs (4-12), Kings (3-13), and Pelicans (2-13) all falling well short of their preseason expectations.

Eastern Conference clubs still have a losing record against the West in the early going, but that has been largely a result of the East’s very worst teams playing a lot of inter-conference games — the Hornets, Nets, Pacers, and Wizards have gone 3-19 against Western Conference opponents, while the other 11 East teams have a 30-17 record vs. the other conference.

In the West, a 5-9 record currently puts the Jazz in a play-in spot, but the 8-8 Bucks are on the outside of the top 10 in the East. Still, it’s not as if Milwaukee faces an insurmountable deficit in the standings. While the 13-2 Pistons are three games ahead of anyone else in the conference, the Nos. 2 through 11 seeds are currently separated by just 2.5 games, from the 10-5 Raptors to those 8-8 Bucks.

The Pistons and Raptors have been two of the conference’s most pleasant surprises so far. Detroit was viewed as a solid playoff team and Toronto was expected to be better than last season’s 30-win version of the team, but both clubs have far exceeded expectations. The Pistons have the NBA’s second-best defense after barely cracking the top 10 in that category last season; the Raptors, meanwhile, are up from 26th in the NBA in offense to eighth this fall.

The Knicks and Cavaliers, who were expected to be good, are third and fourth in the East, closely followed by the 9-6 Heat and Sixers. Miami’s new uptempo offensive system has the Heat playing at the fastest pace in the NBA and has helped rejuvenate a team playing without All-Star guard Tyler Herro. In Philadelphia, Tyrese Maxey appears to be taking a leap to a new level of stardom, whether or not Joel Embiid and Paul George are available — Maxey is the NBA’s second-leading scorer behind Luka Doncic.

The Bulls, Hawks, Magic, and Celtics hold the play-in spots in the East for the time being. Orlando and Atlanta, widely projected to be playoff teams, are still finding their footing as they incorporate offseason additions and deal with injuries affecting star players (Paolo Banchero and Trae Young), but Chicago and Boston have been better than expected.

The Bulls are getting contributions up and down their roster, with seven players averaging at least 13.3 points per game; the Celtics are showing they’re still a dangerous team without Tatum on the court, as Jaylen Brown has admirably taken on the No. 1 role on offense by averaging career highs in points per game (27.5) and field goal percentage (50.3%).

Finally, while the Bucks are sitting at .500 now, three of their recent losses have come in games that Giannis Antetokounmpo missed or exited early. As long as their superstar forward is available for most of the season, they look like a solid playoff contender.

We want to get your early impressions on the Eastern Conference. Which of the early-season surprises – including the Pistons, Raptors, Heat, Sixers, and Bulls – do you believe are for real? Which of the 11 current .500-and-above teams in the East do you expect to finish outside of the top 10? Which teams will be in the top six? Do you believe the East has a deeper group of top-10 teams than the West?

Head to the comment section below to weigh in with your thoughts!

NBA Stars Affected By Player Participation Policy In 2025/26

As we outline in a Hoops Rumors glossary entry, the NBA’s player participation policy – instituted in 2023 – is designed to reduce instances of teams resting healthy players during the regular season.

The player participation policy is focused almost exclusively on players considered “stars” and includes rules prohibiting those stars from sitting out NBA Cup games or nationally televised games without an approved reason (including a legitimate injury).

A team can also run afoul of the policy if it rests more than one star in the same game, repeatedly rests a star in road games instead of home games, or shuts down a star for an extended period of time. The Cavaliers were hit with a fine on Tuesday for violating the policy on November 12, when they rested two stars – Donovan Mitchell and Evan Mobley – in the same game.

For the purposes of the policy, the league defines a “star” as a player who has been named to an All-Star or All-NBA team at least once during the prior three seasons, which is why both Mitchell and Mobley qualified.

A player who earned an All-Star or All-NBA berth in 2023, 2024, and/or 2025 would be considered a “star” during the 2025/26 season and would be subject to the restrictions of the player participation policy.

Here’s the full list of the players who meet that criteria:

  1. Trae Young (Hawks)
  2. Jaylen Brown (Celtics)
  3. Jayson Tatum (Celtics)
  4. Darius Garland (Cavaliers)
  5. Donovan Mitchell (Cavaliers)
  6. Evan Mobley (Cavaliers)
  7. Anthony Davis (Mavericks)
  8. Kyrie Irving (Mavericks)
  9. Nikola Jokic (Nuggets)
  10. Cade Cunningham (Pistons)
  11. Jimmy Butler (Warriors) *
  12. Stephen Curry (Warriors) *
  13. Kevin Durant (Rockets) *
  14. Alperen Sengun (Rockets)
  15. Tyrese Haliburton (Pacers)
  16. Pascal Siakam (Pacers)
  17. James Harden (Clippers) *
  18. Kawhi Leonard (Clippers)
  19. Luka Doncic (Lakers)
  20. LeBron James (Lakers) *
  21. Jaren Jackson Jr. (Grizzlies)
  22. Ja Morant (Grizzlies)
  23. Bam Adebayo (Heat)
  24. Tyler Herro (Heat)
  25. Giannis Antetokounmpo (Bucks)
  26. Anthony Edwards (Timberwolves)
  27. Julius Randle (Timberwolves)
  28. Zion Williamson (Pelicans)
  29. Jalen Brunson (Knicks)
  30. Karl-Anthony Towns (Knicks)
  31. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (Thunder)
  32. Jalen Williams (Thunder)
  33. Paolo Banchero (Magic)
  34. Joel Embiid (Sixers)
  35. Paul George (Sixers) *
  36. Tyrese Maxey (Sixers)
  37. Devin Booker (Suns)
  38. Jrue Holiday (Trail Blazers) *
  39. Damian Lillard (Trail Blazers) *
  40. DeMar DeRozan (Kings) *
  41. Domantas Sabonis (Kings)
  42. De’Aaron Fox (Spurs)
  43. Victor Wembanyama (Spurs)
  44. Scottie Barnes (Raptors)
  45. Lauri Markkanen (Jazz)

Note: The players marked with an asterisk (*) were either 35 years old on opening night or have accumulated 34,000+ career regular minutes or 1,000 career regular season and playoff games, making them eligible for pre-approved rest nights during back-to-back sets.

A total of 17 teams have multiple players considered “stars” for the purposes of the player participation policy in 2025/26, while just four clubs (the Nets, Hornets, Bulls, and Wizards) don’t have a single player affected.

This group of players could grow following the 2026 All-Star Game. A player who isn’t one of 45 currently listed above would have his name added if he’s selected as an All-Star this season. He would be subject to player participation policy restrictions for games played after All-Star weekend.

Active Game Limits For Two-Way Players In 2025/26

When a player signs a two-way contract before the regular season begins, he’s eligible to be active for a maximum of 50 NBA games that season. In order to exceed 50 active games, that player must be promoted from his two-way contract to a spot on the standard roster.

While that 50-game limit applies to a player who is under contract for an entire season, the limit looks a little different for a player who signs a two-way deal after the season begins. That player is eligible to be active for a prorated portion of the maximum 50 games, depending on how many days are left in the regular season.

Let’s consider the case of Jahmai Mashack, who signed a two-way deal with the Grizzlies on Sunday. November 16 is the 27th day of the 174-day regular season, which means the contract will cover 148 days. In order to determine Mashack’s active game limit, we would divide 148 by 174, then multiple that result by 50. That comes to about 42.53, which is rounded to the nearest whole number. So Mashack could be active for up to 43 regular season games.

Rather than doing that math every time a player signs a two-way contract during the 2025/26 season, we’re providing this reference chart. It can be used for the rest of the season to determine how many active games a two-way player will have available, based on when exactly he signs.

Dates Game limit
Oct. 21-22 50
Oct. 23-26 49
Oct. 27-29 48
Oct. 30 – Nov. 2 47
Nov. 3-5 46
Nov. 6-9 45
Nov. 10-12 44
Nov. 13-16 43
Nov. 17-19 42
Nov. 20-23 41
Nov. 24-26 40
Nov. 27-30 39
Dec. 1-3 38
Dec. 4-6 37
Dec. 7-10 36
Dec. 11-13 35
Dec. 14-17 34
Dec. 18-20 33
Dec. 21-24 32
Dec. 25-27 31
Dec. 28-31 30
Jan. 1-3 29
Jan. 4-7 28
Jan. 8-10 27
Jan. 11-14 26
Jan. 15-17 25
Jan. 18-21 24
Jan. 22-24 23
Jan. 25-28 22
Jan. 29-31 21
Feb. 1-4 20
Feb. 5-7 19
Feb. 8-11 18
Feb. 12-14 17
Feb. 15-18 16
Feb. 19-21 15
Feb. 22-25 14
Feb. 26-28 13
Mar. 1-3 12
Mar. 4 11

March 4 is the deadline for teams to sign a player to a two-way contract.

It’s worth noting that while each two-way player has his own individual active game limit, a team that is carrying fewer than 15 players on its standard roster doesn’t have the ability to take advantage of that full limit for each of its two-way players. A team in that situation is restricted to 90 total active games for its two-way players until it adds a 15th man.

You can learn more about active game limits and all the other rules related to two-way contracts in our glossary.

Community Shootaround: Pistons’ Hot Start

Are the Pistons for real?

They were two seasons ago – really, really bad. Historically bad, in fact, in terms of franchise history.

They made a stunning turnaround last season under a new regime headed by president of basketball operations Trajan Langdon and head coach J.B. Bickerstaff. They qualified for the playoffs without having to go through the play-in round, then gave the Knicks a tough battle before falling the first round.

During the preseason, the Cavaliers and Knicks were considered the top two teams in the Eastern Conference. Through the first four weeks of the season, the Pistons have a better record than both of those teams, though one of their two defeats came at the hands of the Cavaliers.

The Pistons possess plenty of good young talent with a sprinkling of veterans to help them along. Cade Cunningham reached All-Star status last season and has entered the early conversation for the league’s Most Valuable Player award.

Not only has Cunningham posted big numbers, but he has usually saved his best for last. Cunningham is among the league leaders in fourth-quarter output.

Center Jalen Duren, a restricted free agent next summer, has stepped up his production at both ends of the floor.

Ausar Thompson’s offensive game still needs work but he’s a stat stuffer and defensive stopper who has served as the team’s secondary ball-handler this season. Second-year player Ron Holland remains a steady contributor off the bench. Backup big man Isaiah Stewart is one of the league’s elite rim protectors and interior defenders.

Tobias Harris and offseason additions Duncan Robinson and Caris LeVert provide shooting, poise and leadership.

Even the end of the bench guys have played big roles. With the entire starting lineup in street clothes on Wednesday, the Pistons defeated the Bulls behind veteran big man Paul Reed and two-way player Daniss Jenkins. Under-the-radar free agent addition Javonte Green and Jenkins led them to an NBA Cup win over the Sixers on Friday, the team’s ninth consecutive victory.

The Pistons should get Cunningham’s projected backcourt partner – Jaden Ivey – back from a knee injury sometime next month. He’ll provide another element to the team’s offense with his quickness and play-making.

The Pistons are a middle-of-the-road shooting team but they make up for it by ranking high in many defensive statistical categories, including field-goal percentage, turnovers forced, and blocks.

That brings us to today’s topic: What is the Pistons’ ceiling this season? Are they at the level of the Cavaliers and Knicks, who are considered the co-favorites in the Eastern Conference? If not, what type of player should Detroit acquire to reach that level?

Please take to the comments section to weigh in on this topic. We look forward to your input.

Nine Players Affected By Poison Pill Provision In 2025/26

The term “poison pill” doesn’t actually show up in the NBA’s Collective Bargaining Agreement, but it’s used colloquially to refer to a provision in the CBA that affects players who recently signed rookie scale contract extensions.

As we explain in our glossary entry, the so-called poison pill provision applies when a player who signed a rookie scale extension is traded before the extension takes effect.

In that scenario, the player’s incoming value for the receiving team for matching purposes is determined by averaging his current-year salary and the salaries in each year of his new extension (including any option years). His current team, on the other hand, simply treats his current-year salary as the outgoing figure for matching purposes.

For instance, Kings forward Keegan Murray is earning a $11,144,093 salary in 2025/26, but signed a five-year, $140MM extension that will begin in ’26/27.

Therefore, if Sacramento wanted to trade Murray this season, his outgoing value for salary-matching purposes would be $11,144,093 (this year’s salary), while his incoming value for the team acquiring him would be $25,190,682 (this year’s salary, plus the $140MM extension, divided by six years).

If a player has signed a maximum-salary rookie scale extension, his future salaries are calculated based on the assumption that the following season’s salary cap will increase by 4.5% and that he won’t achieve the performance criteria for any Rose Rule language included in his deal.

[RELATED: 2025 NBA Rookie Scale Extension Recap]

Most of the players who signed rookie scale extensions aren’t realistic candidates to be traded anytime soon. But even in the event that a team does want to look into trading one of these recently extended players, the gap between the player’s incoming trade value and outgoing trade value could make it a real challenge to find a deal that works for both sides — especially if a team is operating in or near tax apron territory.

The “poison pill” provision applies to nine players who signed rookie scale extensions in 2025. Here are those players, along with their outgoing salaries and incoming salaries for trade purposes:

Player Team Outgoing trade value Incoming trade value
Paolo Banchero ORL $15,334,769 $41,610,606
Chet Holmgren OKC $13,731,368 $41,343,373
Jabari Smith Jr. HOU $12,350,392 $22,391,732
Keegan Murray SAC $11,144,093 $25,190,682
Shaedon Sharpe POR $8,399,983 $19,679,997
Dyson Daniels ATL $7,707,709 $21,541,542
Jalen Williams OKC $6,580,997 $40,151,644
Christian Braun DEN $4,921,797 $21,653,633
Nikola Jovic MIA $4,445,417 $13,369,083

Once the 2026/27 league year begins next July, the poison pill provision will no longer apply to these players. At that time, the player’s ’26/27 salary would represent both his outgoing and incoming value.

Until then, the gap between those outgoing and incoming figures will make it tricky for several of these players to be moved, though it affects some more significantly than others.

The difference of over $33MM between Williams’ incoming and outgoing trade figures, for instance, means there’s essentially no chance he could be dealt to an over-the-cap team in 2025/26 — given that the Thunder have no desire to move Williams, that’ll be a moot point, but it’s still worth noting.

On the other hand, the smaller divide between Jovic’s incoming and outgoing salaries would make a trade involving him a more viable possibility. However, it’s still a significant enough difference to complicate any deal for a Heat team operating right up against the luxury tax line.

NBA G League Affiliate Players For 2025/26

Throughout the offseason and preseason, NBA teams are permitted to carry 21 players, but that number must be reduced to 15 (plus three two-way players) in advance of opening night. However, up to five players waived by teams prior to the season can be designated as “affiliate players” and assigned to their G League squads.

As we explain in more detail in our glossary entry on the subject, if a player’s NBA team has designated him as an affiliate player and he signs a G League contract, he is automatically assigned to that team’s NBAGL roster.

Of the G League’s 31 teams, 30 are directly affiliated with an NBA club. Only the Mexico City Capitanes are unaffiliated and are ineligible to have affiliate players.

Here are the affiliate players for the other 30 squads to open the 2025/26 season, which tipped off last week:


Austin Spurs (Spurs)

Birmingham Squadron (Pelicans)

Capital City Go-Go (Wizards)

Cleveland Charge (Cavaliers)

College Park Skyhawks (Hawks)

Delaware Blue Coats (Sixers)

Grand Rapids Gold (Nuggets)

Greensboro Swarm (Hornets)

Iowa Wolves (Timberwolves)

Long Island Nets (Nets)

Maine Celtics (Celtics)

Memphis Hustle (Grizzlies)

Motor City Cruise (Pistons)

Noblesville Boom (Pacers)

Oklahoma City Blue (Thunder)

Osceola Magic (Magic)

Raptors 905 (Raptors)

Rio Grande Valley Vipers (Rockets)

Rip City Remix (Trail Blazers)

Salt Lake City Stars (Jazz)

San Diego Clippers (Clippers)

Santa Cruz Warriors (Warriors)

Sioux Falls Skyforce (Heat)

South Bay Lakers (Lakers)

Stockton Kings (Kings)

Texas Legends (Mavericks)

Valley Suns (Suns)

Westchester Knicks (Knicks)

  • None

Windy City Bulls (Bulls)

Wisconsin Herd (Bucks)

  • None

Note: While some G League teams officially listed their affiliate players when announcing their rosters, many of these lists are based on our own research.


In addition to these “affiliate players,” G League teams have the ability to fill out their rosters with the following types of players:

  • Returning rights: Players whose G League rights were already held by the team from a previous season (or were acquired in a trade from another NBAGL team).
  • G League draft rights: Players who were selected in this season’s G League draft.
  • NBA draft rights: Players who were drafted by an NBA team and signed a G League contract instead of an NBA contract.
  • Local tryout: Players who earned a shot via a local tryout.
  • G League player pool: Players who signed G League contracts and went undrafted (or signed their contracts after the draft). Newly signed players go through a waiver process and enter the league’s free agent pool if they go unclaimed.
  • Two-way contract: Players who are on a two-way contract with an NBA team and have been transferred to the G League.
  • NBA assignment: Players who are on a standard contract with an NBA team and have been assigned to the G League.

2025/26 NBA Two-Way Contract Conversions

At Hoops Rumors, we track virtually every kind of transaction, including free agent signings, trades, contract extensions, and many more. One form of roster move that has become increasingly common in recent years is the two-way conversion, involving a player either being converted from an Exhibit 10 contract to a two-way deal or from a two-way deal to his team’s standard roster.

We’re going to use the space below to track all of the two-way conversions (either to or from the standard roster) completed in 2025/26.


Exhibit 10 contracts to two-way contracts:

When a player signs a contract during the offseason that includes Exhibit 10 language, he gives his new team the ability to unilaterally convert his deal into a two-way contract. The deadline to convert such a deal is the day before the season begins — this year that was Monday, October 20.

A player who signs a training camp contract that doesn’t include Exhibit 10 language could still sign a two-way deal with his club as long as his camp contract doesn’t include a guarantee exceeding $85,300. However, he’d have to clear waivers before inking that new two-way contract.

Here are the players who had their Exhibit 10 contracts converted into two-way deals in 2025/26:

These players were invited to training camp on Exhibit 10 contracts and ultimately earned two-way slots based on their performances in camp and the preseason. Some were battling with other camp invitees for an open two-way spot, while others won a spot that wasn’t technically available, forcing their respective teams to waive players who had previously been signed to two-way contracts.

With the exception of Harper, who was promoted to the standard roster on October 16, all of these players were converted from two-ways to standard deals on Oct. 18, which was the date most teams set their rosters for the regular season.

No additional names will be added to this list for the rest of the 2025/26 season, since players can’t be converted to two-way deals after the regular season begins.


Two-way contracts to standard contracts:

A player who is on a two-way contract can have his deal unilaterally converted a one-year, minimum-salary contract by his team (or a two-year, minimum-salary contract if the player’s two-way deal covers two years, though this is rare).

Generally though, the team’s preference is to negotiate a longer-term contract with the player in order to avoid having him reach free agency at season’s end.

When converting a player from a two-way contract to the standard roster, the team can use cap room or the non-taxpayer mid-level exception to negotiate a deal of up to four years; the room exception for a deal up to three years; or the taxpayer mid-level exception, bi-annual exception, or minimum salary exception for a two-year deal.

For any contract that is worth more than the minimum or exceeds the number of years left on the player’s two-way pact, the player must agree to the terms — a team can’t complete that sort of deal unilaterally.

Here are the players who have been converted from two-way deals to standard contracts so far in 2025/26, along with the terms of their new contracts, in chronological order:

  • Keaton Wallace (Hawks): One year, minimum salary (story). Partially guaranteed ($318,217). Signed using minimum salary exception.

Players on two-way contracts can be converted to standard deals until the last day of the regular season, so this list will continue to grow until April 12.

Community Shootaround: Ja Morant

Ja Morant’s days with the Grizzlies appear to be numbered.

The controversial guard served a one-game team suspension on Sunday after he expressed frustration with the team’s coaching staff following their previous game, a loss to the Lakers in which Morant played poorly at both ends of the floor.

Morant wasn’t any cheerier after returning to action against the Pistons on Monday. He was held to 18 points after another subpar shooting performance, going 5-for-16 from the field. He also committed five turnovers, while counterpart Cade Cunningham took over the game in the fourth quarter, scoring 19 of his 33 points.

When asked if he had any joy playing basketball right now, Morant responded, “No.”

Morant’s career has nosedived after a very promising start. He was the second overall pick in the 2019 draft and quickly emerged as one of the league’s top point guards.

However, off the court issues stained his reputation. He was twice suspended in 2023 for conduct detrimental to the league for brandishing weapons in social media videos.

Injuries have also marred his career. After serving those suspensions, he was limited to nine games during the 2023/24 season due to a torn labrum in his right shoulder. Last season, he appeared in just 50 games, mainly due to an ankle injury. Since his rookie year, he’s never played in more than 63 regular season games.

With Morant leading the way, the franchise seemed poised to be a perennial powerhouse after the Grizzlies reached the conference semifinals in 2021/22. In the last three seasons, they’ve been knocked out in the first round, sandwiching the 27-55 campaign when Morant was limited to nine games.

It’s not a novel concept for the Grizzlies to consider dealing their floor leader, even if he doesn’t request a trade. According to NBA insider Marc Stein, the idea of the Grizzlies moving Morant is a possibility that rival teams have been monitoring since at least the summer. However, ESPN’s Marc Spears reported on Tuesday that executives he’s spoken to have no interest in dealing for Morant, citing his off the court conduct and contract issues.

“Four of the execs I talked to today say they really have no interest in trading for him. One said it was because it’s a combo of contract and off the court issues,” Spears said on NBA Today (YouTube link). “Another suggested that if Ja is traded it’ll probably be a problem star for a problem star. I asked one current NBA coach if he would like to coach Ja Morant and he said I’m not sure I’d want to.”

Salary considerations would be a big factor for any team pondering a trade for Morant. He has two more years left on his current five-year, $197.22MM contract. He’s also due a 15% trade bonus (capped at his maximum salary) if he’s dealt.

His new team would have to believe Morant would be the missing piece to a championship. That team would also have to be convinced that Morant would benefit from a change of scenery and come in with a more mature, focused approach.

That brings us to today’s topic: Do you think the Grizzlies will deal Ja Morant this season? If so, which teams would be a logical fit for him?

Please take to the comments section to weigh in on this topic. We look forward to your input.

Players Signed After Wednesday Won’t Be Trade-Eligible This Season

When a free agent signs a standard contract with an NBA team, he becomes ineligible to be traded for at least three months. Since this season’s trade deadline will land on February 5, that means a player who signs a new deal with a team anytime after Wednesday, November 5 won’t be eligible to be dealt this season.

That three-month trade restriction also applies to a player who is converted from a two-way contract to a standard deal. So if a player signs as a free agent or is promoted from a two-way deal to a standard roster spot this Thursday, his trade restriction wouldn’t lift until February 6, a day after this season’s deadline has passed.

If no new deals are completed by midnight Eastern on Wednesday, the last signee who will have trade eligibility later this season will likely be Precious Achiuwa, who is expected to sign with the Kings today or tomorrow. If Achiuwa officially signs on Tuesday and is still under contract with Sacramento three months from now, he’d become trade-eligible on February 4, the day before the deadline.

Pacers guard Mac McClung (January 28), Pelicans center DeAndre Jordan (January 23), Hawks guard Keaton Wallace (January 18), and Kings guard Russell Westbrook (January 16) are a few of the other players who would become eligible to be moved in the weeks leading up to the Feb. 5 deadline, assuming they remain under contract until then.

The three-month trade restriction doesn’t apply to players who sign two-way contracts — those players are ineligible to be dealt for just 30 days. Trades involving players on two-way deals are pretty rare, but it’s worth noting that anyone who inks a two-way contract on or before January 6 would still become trade-eligible ahead of this season’s deadline.

We previously shared lists of players who won’t become trade-eligible until December 15 or January 15 after signing new contracts in the offseason. We’ll soon publish one more list detailing which players have special, specific trade eligibility dates — that group will include Achiuwa, McClung, and the rest of the players mentioned above, plus many more, including several who signed offseason contract extensions.

Recap Of 2026/27 Rookie Scale Option Decisions

Decisions on rookie scale options for the 2026/27 season were due on Friday — any team that wanted to exercise a third- or fourth-year option on a player for next season was required to do so by October 31.

As is typically the case, a huge majority of those options were picked up. Even for top picks, who are paid higher salaries due to the NBA’s rookie scale, those third- and fourth-year options are relatively team-friendly. So unless a player has fallen well short of his team’s expectations, it generally makes sense to lock in his salary for the following season at this point.

However, not every player with a 2026/27 team option had it exercised by Friday’s deadline. A player who had his option declined will now be on track to reach unrestricted free agency during the summer of 2026, assuming he’s not waived before then. At the end of the season, his team won’t be able to offer him a starting salary that exceeds the value of his declined option.

Listed below are the players who had their options turned down, followed by the players whose options were exercised. If a player had his option picked up, his ’26/27 salary is now guaranteed and he won’t be eligible for free agency until at least 2027.


Declined options:

  • Jett Howard, Magic (fourth year, $7,337,938)
  • Kobe Bufkin, Nets (fourth year, $6,904,203)
    • Note: Bufkin’s fourth-year option was declined when he was waived by Brooklyn.
  • Dariq Whitehead, Nets (fourth year, $5,366,911)
    • Note: Whitehead’s fourth-year option was declined when he was cut by Brooklyn.
  • Olivier-Maxence Prosper, Mavericks (fourth year, $5,259,383)
    • Note: Prosper’s fourth-year option was declined when he was waived by Dallas, which used the stretch provision to spread his $3MM cap hit over three seasons.
  • Nick Smith Jr., Hornets (fourth year, $4,890,067)
    • Note: Smith’s fourth-year option was declined when he was released by Charlotte.
  • Kobe Brown, Clippers (fourth year, $4,792,058)
  • Dillon Jones, Wizards (third year, $2,884,440)
    • Note: Jones’ third-year option was declined when he was cut by Washington.

Jones was the only 2024 first-round pick (he was selected 26th overall) who did not have his third-year option picked up. In addition to the six 2023 first-rounders listed above, Jalen Hood-Schifino also had his third- and fourth-year options declined by the Lakers last year. He was subsequently traded to — and released by — the Jazz, and is now on a two-way contract with Philadelphia.

Howard (No. 11 overall in 2023) was the lone former lottery pick whose option was turned down this fall. The 22-year-old wing has yet to carve out a rotation role with Orlando, the team that selected him, and the Magic project to be a tax apron team next season even without Howard’s $7,337,938 salary on their books.

Aside from Howard, Brown is the only other player who remains with the team that declined his option. Similar to Howard, the 25-year-old forward has rarely played for the Clippers over the past two-plus seasons.

None of the declined options were too surprising this year, as the seven players have not been significant NBA contributors to this point in their careers.

The Nets’ decisions to waive Bufkin and Whitehead were motivated by a roster crunch and a desire to stay above the minimum salary floor entering the season — not reaching the floor would have caused Brooklyn to lose its luxury tax distribution, which is projected to be around $12.8MM.

The Mavs, Hornets and Wizards were all facing roster crunches as well. While Charlotte and Washington had plenty of financial wiggle room to eat guaranteed salaries, Dallas needed to use the stretch provision on Prosper to create enough room below its second-apron cap to finalize a veteran’s minimum deal with Dante Exum, who has yet to play this season due to a knee injury.

Prosper and Smith are now on two-way deals with the Grizzlies and Lakers, respectively, after having their fourth-year options declined. Bufkin, Whitehead and Jones are all unrestricted free agents.


Exercised options:

Fourth year:

Note: These players will become eligible for rookie scale extensions in July of 2026. If they’re not extended, they’ll be on track for restricted free agency in 2027.

These 23 players who had their fourth-year options exercised, along with the seven listed in the section above who had their fourth-year options declined, were drafted in the first round in 2023.

Third year:

Note: Teams will have to make fourth-year option decisions for 2026/27 on these players by November 2, 2026.

As usual, nearly every player from the 2024 draft class had his third-year option picked up, with 29 of 30 exercised. As noted above, Jones is the only player from 2024’s first round who is now a free agent.


For a team-by-team breakdown of this year’s rookie scale option decisions for the 2026/27 season, along with full stories on each decision, you can check out our tracker.

Show all